Cappy_Smurf wrote:aggo wrote:
People for whatever reason think the Knicks have no leverage. What? The Knicks may want DM, but they dont "need" him. DM to Knicks rumor is a consequence of Gobert to Minn. That was the extent of our pursuit of DM.
Ainge is a min/max and spreadsheet guy so he 100% understands that when he made the Gobert trade he is going full Sam Hinkie/Presti and asset collection/tank mode. There is no way Ainge wants to go into the season with DM because he wants to tank. We know Ainge wants to tank because he loves his spreadsheets, analytics, stats, and being a min/max guy.
.
As a Jazz fan who has watched the team for 40+ years, I can tell you that Mitchell won't be spoiling any tank Utah has rolling. Anytime Rudy Gobert has missed multiple games over the last few years, the team has been straight trash. Even if Utah brought back the exact same team, minus Gobert, Utah is a play-in team at best. Now, when you consider Jingles is already gone and they are likely to trade other key players, this Utah team will be a disaster, Mitchell or no Mitchell.
Even through your 40+ years of Jazz experience the numbers don't support your argument at all. Gobert has missed very little time over the past 5 years but he did miss 26 games in 17/18 and 16 games last season. The Jazz went 12-14 in 17/18 (Mitchell's rookie season) and 7-9 last season. That's an overall record of 19-23 without Gobert. While certainly not as good as the average of 50 wins with both of them in there, it does seem to suggest that Mitchell alone in there is likely going to put you out of the top 5. I assume teams like Orlando, Houston, OKC, Spurs will all struggle to win even 25 games. The Jazz with Mitchell are very likely to exceed that number.
The Knicks have much more leverage here and Rose should definitely wait it out. As it is, the Brunson/Mitchell fit is questionable at best and Mitchell is not gonna propel the Knicks into 50+ win territory. Let the Jazz make a deal with some other team. All the supposedly interested teams will fail to even put together a package that is as good as the Knicks worst package. The only team that may reasonably be able to put together a better package is OKC but they certainly won't consider trading unprotected firsts at all in midst of their tank.
The Heat? Yeah let Ainge negotiate with the Heat and get back those unprotected FRPs in the 28-30 range. That will be of tremendous help and a great haul for Mitchell. There is no team that can offer anything close to what the Knicks are offering because the Knicks unprotected FRPs will be still in a solid range (likely 16-22). All the contending teams can only offer extremely low FRPs (25-30 range) and many of them are out of additionaly tradable picks anyways.
Don't budge at all: Let the season begin as it is---if things go bad for the Knicks, we are sitting on 3 picks in a possibly generational draft. If we play well then we'll have even more leverage and less pressure to desperately trade for Mitchell. If the Jazz however start winning some games (say 10-15 to start the season) their tank will look pretty endangered and Ainge's asking price will go down automatically.
Summary: The Knicks have no real competitor for Mitchell. Teams tanking or in lottery land are not gonna trade them unprotected FRPs AT ALL and contending teams would be sending them 25-30 type picks. The Knicks are one of the few, if not the only team that in a post-Mitchell trade scenario would still be sending mid first round picks + additional picks that look mid first round likely. There is literally no other team out there that can dublicate that.
The Jazz biggest priority is a 2023 tank. Time is on the Knicks side here. The Jazz will win some games with Mitchell alone there. Don't bid against yourself. Sit it out. If some team comes along with an insane offer and snatches Mitchell---well so be it. No Knick fan should be dissapointed in not getting a questionable fit for an insane price.