BallSacBounce wrote:NYKnickerbocker wrote:Officer definitely should face serious consequences for shooting and killing him. But the guy definitely should have been arrested. Passed out drunk in the drive thru lane. Some family/person is lucky he wasn’t on the highway.
Drunk drivers have affected parts of my family multiple times. Feel bad the man was killed. Had no problem with the officers cuffing him tho
What serious consequences do you think he should face? The suspect fought the officers trying to arrest him, grabbed a taser, ran and then turned around to shoot it at the pursuing officer.
In Georgia apparently a taser is considered a deadly weapon, according to what the DA said two weeks ago and who was also the one who charged the officer. This reeks of political BS mob justice.
Hey, there could be details that turn it from being justified to unjustified but I've yet to hear them. Do you know of any?
There are a ton of things I'd like to see changed with policing. Qualified immunity, no-knock warrants, civil forfeiture and a greater emphasis on techniques recognizing that police are dealing with humans and not a something that needs to be handled.
In this case though I'm not seeing the problem legally for the officer.
The Taser had already been used twice by the officer. So it was benign and the officer knew it. Plus, they spoke to him for thirty minutes without an issue. Clearly, they were not threatened by him. He just wanted to go home to see his kid graduate the next day. He was on probation at the time and any arrest meant he was going back to jail and going to miss his daughter's graduation. The cops screwed up on this one. They should've just let him walk home, give him a ride like they would've if he was white, or waiting until someone could pick him up. If no one was available to pick him up, they could've brought him back to the precinct and held in him a cell until someone could come pick him up. This is done all of the time.