F N 11 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Apparently KP became a better player while not playing.
Fascinating
Meanwhile Zion is ahead of Klay Thompson. Don’t take anything ESPN seriously.
You mean Everything Stupid Predicted by Numbnutz?
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
F N 11 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Apparently KP became a better player while not playing.
Fascinating
Meanwhile Zion is ahead of Klay Thompson. Don’t take anything ESPN seriously.
Triple C wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:5 days now to camp? Leggo!
god shammgod wrote:Triple C wrote:
even if it was true, would you give max money to the 34th best player in the league ? keep him

god shammgod wrote:Triple C wrote:
even if it was true, would you give max money to the 34th best player in the league ? keep him
Deeeez Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:Triple C wrote:
even if it was true, would you give max money to the 34th best player in the league ? keep him
Yes. His max is not as much as other max's so he is the 33rd highest player for next year with room to get better

god shammgod wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:
even if it was true, would you give max money to the 34th best player in the league ? keep him
Yes. His max is not as much as other max's so he is the 33rd highest player for next year with room to get better
how good do you think he can be ? top 10 ? 15 ? i doubt it. i'm just saying, i don't think you can build around him as your franchise player. in dallas it's better for them since he'll never be the number one option. i've said many times that i would have paid him too. but i see letting him go as actually the safer move. i understood it. the percentage of him both becoming dominant and staying healthy doesn't seem great.

moocow007 wrote:I could argue that Randle is actually a more talented player overall than Porzingis (they're both the same age). Not to discredit Porzingis completely but how much of the "legend of the Unicorn" is because he was a 7 foot guy that could shoot 3's?

?
Gravy wrote:DSJ for Fultz? I'd have to think about that... Whoever's jumper gets fixed.
god shammgod wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:
even if it was true, would you give max money to the 34th best player in the league ? keep him
Yes. His max is not as much as other max's so he is the 33rd highest player for next year with room to get better
how good do you think he can be ? top 10 ? 15 ? i doubt it. i'm just saying, i don't think you can build around him as your franchise player. in dallas it's better for them since he'll never be the number one option. i've said many times that i would have paid him too. but i see letting him go as actually the safer move. i understood it. the percentage of him both becoming dominant and staying healthy doesn't seem great.
Gravy wrote:DSJ for Fultz? I'd have to think about that... Whoever's jumper gets fixed.