Around the NBA 2025-26 - Vol 2... Hard Knock Season

NiceLikeChrist · Post #1581 » by **NiceLikeChrist** » Yesterday 2:26 am

3toheadmelo wrote:

Read on Twitter

Spoiler:
wild that he already he has a bigger bag than kat. this guy came into the league as a hustle player with no offensive moves

He looks like he been studying Julius Randle tape religiously

Post #1582 » by **Jeff Van Gully** » Yesterday 2:27 am

HEZI wrote:Rockets are so versatile. If they keep building chemistry they have a chance to be extremely hard to guard because of the matchup problems they can create all over the place

team is a problem already. talented and tough.

TheGreenArrow · Post #1583 » by **TheGreenArrow** » Yesterday 2:42 am

If we were in the west would we even be a play-in team???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hou okc Denver lakers spurs would easily beat us in a 7game series!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Depressing Af!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

aq_ua · Post #1584 » by **aq_ua** » Yesterday 2:45 am

TheGreenArrow wrote:If we were in the west would we even be a play-in team???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hou okc Denver lakers spurs would easily beat us in a 7game series!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Depressing Af!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I read something about parity in the East and West this season. Yeah, definitely don’t see that. Utah could make the playoffs in the East.

Montmorencie · Post #1585 » by **Montmorencie** » Yesterday 6:17 am

TheGreenArrow wrote:If we were in the west would we even be a play-in team???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hou okc Denver lakers spurs would easily beat us in a 7game series!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Depressing Af!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spurs no. But Warriors and Wolves for sure.

spree2kawhi · Post #1586 » by **spree2kawhi** » Yesterday 10:25 am

Montmorencie wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:If we were in the west would we even be a play-in team???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hou okc Denver lakers spurs would easily beat us in a 7game series!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Depressing Af!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Spurs no. But Warriors and Wolves for sure.

Actually, only OKC and Denver are better than us really. I’m not even so sure with Denver (or what do we make of their losses against against Chicago, Portland and the Warriors - double standard, some?). Y’all need to chill.

Iron Mantis · Post #1587 » by **Iron Mantis** » Yesterday 10:56 am

RJ lifting the Raptors to #2 in the east.

Magic and Hawks are trending in the right direction after slow starts.

Sixers, Bulls, and Bucks falling back down to Earth.

Guano · Post #1588 » by **Guano** » Yesterday 1:50 pm

Got dayum the east is putrid this year.

We need to get our sht together. Its too wide open.

Also with the bucks hovering around .500 it might be time to send that "how you doing, I heard things arent going so well" late night text.

Guano · Post #1589 » by **Guano** » Yesterday 2:07 pm

They invented a time machine to pull this guy from the 50s to debunk the 'they played against janitors & mechanics' debate

Read on Twitter

8516knicks · Post #1590 » by **8516knicks** » Yesterday 2:50 pm

Iron Mantis wrote:RJ lifting the Raptors to #2 in the east.

Magic and Hawks are trending in the right direction after slow starts.

Sixers, Bulls, and Bucks falling back down to Earth.

Was just about to post -- SURPRISES -- Knicks and Heat stellar at home; Hawks 2nd best road record but suck at home.

WaltFrazier · Post #1591 » by **WaltFrazier** » Yesterday 2:52 pm

god shammgod wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:

Kerr on the rash of soft tissue injuries across the league

you can really see it. it's a track meet now. you have teams that don't even have much talent but they can be somewhat competitive by just playing fast. if you play a lot of minutes or you're a big guy, it's gonna be increasingly difficult to stay healthy.

Kerr is right, none of the parties will want less revenue in exchange for a shorter season. Silver floated the idea of 10 minute quarters/40 minute games a year or so ago. Like FIBA, NCAA, WNBA play, every high level except the NBA. Not sure if that would help with injuries, and there'd be other arguments against it.

Think how if every player in the league was healthy today how different things would be

thebuzzardman · Post #1592 » by **thebuzzardman** » Yesterday 3:03 pm

Guano wrote:They invented a time machine to pull this guy from the 50s to debunk the 'they played against janitors & mechanics' debate

Read on Twitter

HE EVEN LOOKS LIKE MICHAEL J FOX!!! (Famous 1950s time traveler)

thebuzzardman · Post #1593 » by **thebuzzardman** » Yesterday 3:04 pm

WaltFrazier wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:

Kerr on the rash of soft tissue injuries across the league

you can really see it. it's a track meet now. you have teams that don't even have much talent but they can be somewhat competitive by just playing fast. if you play a lot of minutes or you're a big guy, it's gonna be increasingly difficult to stay healthy.

Kerr is right, none of the parties will want less revenue in exchange for a shorter season. Silver floated the idea of 10 minute quarters/40 minute games a year or so ago. Like FIBA, NCAA, WNBA play, every high level except the NBA. Not sure if that would help with injuries, and there'd be other arguments against it.

Think how if every player in the league was healthy today how different things would be

So, Warriors and Kerr won by implementing this style and now that the Warriors are aging out of the ability to play it he wants to pull the ladder up after him/them?

GTFO

NoDopeOnSundays · Post #1594 » by **NoDopeOnSundays** » Yesterday 3:19 pm

Guano wrote:They invented a time machine to pull this guy from the 50s to debunk the 'they played against janitors & mechanics' debate

Read on Twitter

He's already the Hornets best player.

Guano · Post #1595 » by **Guano** » Yesterday 3:48 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Guano wrote:They invented a time machine to pull this guy from the 50s to debunk the 'they played against janitors & mechanics' debate

Read on Twitter

He's already the Hornets best player.

Not so fast...

Read on Twitter

sorry greenie :oops:

spree2kawhi · Post #1596 » by **spree2kawhi** » Yesterday 4:37 pm

Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Guano wrote:They invented a time machine to pull this guy from the 50s to debunk the 'they played against janitors & mechanics' debate

Read on Twitter

He's already the Hornets best player.

Not so fast...

Read on Twitter

sorry greenie

I knew he’d be a losing player way before he entered the league.

TheGreenArrow · Post #1597 » by **TheGreenArrow** » Yesterday 4:55 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
Guano wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

He's already the Hornets best player.

Not so fast...

Read on Twitter

sorry greenie

I knew he’d be a losing player way before he entered the league.

That’s not fair tbh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The hornets are one of the worst organizations in sports!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Put Lamelo on that pacers team last year and they sweep the thunder pretty easily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NoDopeOnSundays · Post #1598 » by **NoDopeOnSundays** » Yesterday 5:02 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
Guano wrote:
Not so fast...

Read on Twitter

sorry greenie

I knew he’d be a losing player way before he entered the league.

That’s not fair tbh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The hornets are one of the worst organizations in sports!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Put Lamelo on that pacers team last year and they sweep the thunder pretty easily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your lies and tricks wont work Greenie, we see that the Pacers are 2-13 without Haliburton, he's a winner. The Hornets are 4-11, because their highest paid player is a loser.

TheGreenArrow · Post #1599 » by **TheGreenArrow** » Yesterday 5:20 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:I knew he’d be a losing player way before he entered the league.

That’s not fair tbh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The hornets are one of the worst organizations in sports!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Put Lamelo on that pacers team last year and they sweep the thunder pretty easily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your lies and tricks wont work Greenie, we see that the Pacers are 2-13 without Haliburton, he's a winner. The Hornets are 4-11, because their highest paid player is a loser.

When Hes repping the Orange&Blue you will change your tune!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NoDopeOnSundays · Post #1600 » by **NoDopeOnSundays** » Yesterday 5:23 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
That’s not fair tbh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The hornets are one of the worst organizations in sports!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Put Lamelo on that pacers team last year and they sweep the thunder pretty easily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your lies and tricks wont work Greenie, we see that the Pacers are 2-13 without Haliburton, he's a winner. The Hornets are 4-11, because their highest paid player is a loser.

When Hes repping the Orange&Blue you will change your tune!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Only orange & blue he'll be wearing are the Sichuan Blue Whales.