ImageImageImageImageImage

Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,850
And1: 9,504
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#161 » by Zenzibar » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:38 pm

robillionaire wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:

This!.100%.

The new lottery reform does nothing for losers, we know this first hand. Let's get to keeping our picks, drafting wisely, development and signing quality young players to compliment them.


how ? the team with the worst record got pick 2 and the team with the 3rd worst record got the 1st pick. only 1 team in the top 3 moved back. we just didn't tank enough. as usual.


This. Most teams that tanked still got what they wanted.


That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image
Stop All Genocides
User avatar
HerSports85
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 21,757
And1: 35,336
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#162 » by HerSports85 » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:40 pm

I don't know, Vanvleet going to be pretty hard to pass up if he wants to come here.
BAF: Chicago Bulls
23-24 In-season tournament Champs
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,103
And1: 136,500
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#163 » by god shammgod » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:42 pm

say you get van vleet for 25 per. and say you now, with some of mitch & rj's improvement, reach 38 wins. which is a best case scenario. now what ? sign giannis. what if he says no ? what if ad says no and kawhi says no ? sign demarr ? you're not getting any good pick at 38 wins. so what is the plan beyond making a 1 year improvement ? what is the plan to actually become a contender ? the thing to accept is that nobody is coming to save this franchise most likely. and they certainly aren't coming alone. people bring up the nets and that they attracted durant & kyrie but they also had the cap space to do so. fred van vleet at 25 per on a long contract might become hard to move. so you've messed up the cap space. you've messed up our ability to get good picks. we would be in a worse position than now.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,103
And1: 136,500
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#164 » by god shammgod » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:43 pm

Zenzibar wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
how ? the team with the worst record got pick 2 and the team with the 3rd worst record got the 1st pick. only 1 team in the top 3 moved back. we just didn't tank enough. as usual.


This. Most teams that tanked still got what they wanted.


That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image


you're not guaranteed it working out because you did it 1 year. you have to do it for a few.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,954
And1: 57,330
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#165 » by robillionaire » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:51 pm

Zenzibar wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
how ? the team with the worst record got pick 2 and the team with the 3rd worst record got the 1st pick. only 1 team in the top 3 moved back. we just didn't tank enough. as usual.


This. Most teams that tanked still got what they wanted.


That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image


yeah, we got the 3rd pick, would love to have that again in this draft and in the next one. I'm glad we have RJ instead of whoever we would have picked at 8th or 9th.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,933
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#166 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:52 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
This. Most teams that tanked still got what they wanted.


That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image


you're not guaranteed it working out because you did it 1 year. you have to do it for a few.


Tanking is a low value proposition.

You're talking about a 9-15% difference between the Warriors and the Knicks. That's not really significant enough to throw your whole season away over, let alone multiple seasons.

You would win 37 games and still have a pretty decent shot.
Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,850
And1: 9,504
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#167 » by Zenzibar » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:52 pm

god shammgod wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
This. Most teams that tanked still got what they wanted.


That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image


you're not guaranteed it working out because you did it 1 year. you have to do it for a few.


Image
Stop All Genocides
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,103
And1: 136,500
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#168 » by god shammgod » Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:57 pm

GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image


you're not guaranteed it working out because you did it 1 year. you have to do it for a few.


Tanking is a low value proposition.

You're talking about a 9-15% difference between the Warriors and the Knicks. That's not really significant enough to throw your whole season away over, let alone multiple seasons.

You would win 37 games and still have a pretty decent shot.


we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,954
And1: 57,330
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#169 » by robillionaire » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:00 pm

GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
That is so true! Just like we got Zion or Morant last year, that's right. Stupid me,what was I thinking?

Image


you're not guaranteed it working out because you did it 1 year. you have to do it for a few.


Tanking is a low value proposition.

You're talking about a 9-15% difference between the Warriors and the Knicks. That's not really significant enough to throw your whole season away over, let alone multiple seasons.

You would win 37 games and still have a pretty decent shot.


there was a 6 win difference between the warriors and knicks. 2 between us and minnesota who had the 2nd best odds. that's the difference between best odds and 6th best. are those 2-6 wins THAT meaningful and important? because that's usually the difference between top 3 and 8-9
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,933
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#170 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:01 pm

god shammgod wrote:
GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
you're not guaranteed it working out because you did it 1 year. you have to do it for a few.


Tanking is a low value proposition.

You're talking about a 9-15% difference between the Warriors and the Knicks. That's not really significant enough to throw your whole season away over, let alone multiple seasons.

You would win 37 games and still have a pretty decent shot.


we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:


KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja. We'd also have the 3rd or 4th pick now.

I rest my case :lol:
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,954
And1: 57,330
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#171 » by robillionaire » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:02 pm

GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Tanking is a low value proposition.

You're talking about a 9-15% difference between the Warriors and the Knicks. That's not really significant enough to throw your whole season away over, let alone multiple seasons.

You would win 37 games and still have a pretty decent shot.


we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:


KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


Zion is too fat to even walk properly. Yall are disrespecting RJ Barrett just to make the argument
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,933
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#172 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:04 pm

robillionaire wrote:
GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:


KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


Zion is too fat to even walk properly. Yall are disrespecting RJ Barrett just to make the argument


I named 2 players. In reality, I named the #1 and #2 picks. The players are irrelevant.

You are ignoring the larger argument to prop up RJ (which I respect, but is disingenuous :lol: )
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,954
And1: 57,330
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#173 » by robillionaire » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:05 pm

GONYK wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
GONYK wrote:
KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


Zion is too fat to even walk properly. Yall are disrespecting RJ Barrett just to make the argument


I named 2 players. In reality, I named the #1 and #2 picks. The players are irrelevant.

You are ignoring the larger argument to prop up RJ (which I respect, but is disingenuous :lol: )


I'm actually not. But okay, the players are irrelevant. The 3rd pick is better than 8-9. in every draft. the end
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,103
And1: 136,500
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#174 » by god shammgod » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:06 pm

GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Tanking is a low value proposition.

You're talking about a 9-15% difference between the Warriors and the Knicks. That's not really significant enough to throw your whole season away over, let alone multiple seasons.

You would win 37 games and still have a pretty decent shot.


we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:


KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


just give me 1 more year god damn it. :lol: start trying to win in 2021. there might not even be crowds or a full season next year. it's perfect to tank and it's supposed to be a great class. we're throwing that away to come close to maxing fred van vleet ? is he even a top 10 point in this league ? exactly, so f*ck him.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,954
And1: 57,330
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#175 » by robillionaire » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:07 pm

god shammgod wrote:
GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:


KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


just give me 1 more year god damn it. :lol: start trying to win in 2021. there might not even be crowds or a full season next year. it's perfect to tank and it's supposed to be a great class. we're throwing that away to come close to maxing fred van vleet ? is he even a top 10 point in this league ? exactly, so f*ck him.


he's a system pg in a great system with a great coach. we have no business even trying to bring this guy in for max money
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,933
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#176 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:07 pm

robillionaire wrote:
GONYK wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Zion is too fat to even walk properly. Yall are disrespecting RJ Barrett just to make the argument


I named 2 players. In reality, I named the #1 and #2 picks. The players are irrelevant.

You are ignoring the larger argument to prop up RJ (which I respect, but is disingenuous :lol: )


I'm actually not. But okay, the players are irrelevant. The 3rd pick is better than 8-9. in every draft. the end


I'm sure the Pelicans and the Grizzlies agree, since they jumped into the #1 and #2 from the 7-9 slots
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,933
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#177 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:11 pm

god shammgod wrote:
GONYK wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
we did throw the whole season away though. we have for years now. we got kp and rj when we tanked enough. we got frank & knox when we didn't. i rest my case. :lol:


KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


just give me 1 more year god damn it. :lol: start trying to win in 2021. there might not even be crowds or a full season next year. it's perfect to tank and it's supposed to be a great class. we're throwing that away to come close to maxing fred van vleet ? is he even a top 10 point in this league ? exactly, so f*ck him.


You're going to get a ~33 win team, and there's nothing you can do about it :lol:
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,954
And1: 57,330
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#178 » by robillionaire » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:11 pm

GONYK wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
GONYK wrote:
I named 2 players. In reality, I named the #1 and #2 picks. The players are irrelevant.

You are ignoring the larger argument to prop up RJ (which I respect, but is disingenuous :lol: )


I'm actually not. But okay, the players are irrelevant. The 3rd pick is better than 8-9. in every draft. the end


I'm sure the Pelicans and the Grizzlies agree, since they jumped into the #1 and #2 from the 7-9 slots


Yeah, they got lucky. You are wanting to rely on luck instead of math. The Knicks have had great luck, let's keep trying.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,103
And1: 136,500
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#179 » by god shammgod » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:12 pm

robillionaire wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
GONYK wrote:
KP was under the old system. It made sense back then. Not so much now.

If we won more games, we'd have Zion or Ja.

I rest my case :lol:


just give me 1 more year god damn it. :lol: start trying to win in 2021. there might not even be crowds or a full season next year. it's perfect to tank and it's supposed to be a great class. we're throwing that away to come close to maxing fred van vleet ? is he even a top 10 point in this league ? exactly, so f*ck him.


he's a system pg in a great system with a great coach. we have no business even trying to bring this guy in for max money


i like him. he's a good player. plays great defense, hits 3s. not a 1st or 2nd scoring option. not the main play maker on that team. not near a max contract guy on a contender.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,933
And1: 45,604
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Thoughts on aggressive pursuit of Fred Van Vleet & Joe Harris/Davis Bertans 

Post#180 » by GONYK » Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:13 pm

robillionaire wrote:
GONYK wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
I'm actually not. But okay, the players are irrelevant. The 3rd pick is better than 8-9. in every draft. the end


I'm sure the Pelicans and the Grizzlies agree, since they jumped into the #1 and #2 from the 7-9 slots


Yeah, they got lucky. You are wanting to rely on luck instead of math. The Knicks have had great luck, let's keep trying.


The math involved in the current lottery system isn't any more reliable than luck. That's my point.

You are trying to maximize sh*tty odds, no matter what you do. So you might as well actually build a team. You have way more control over that.

Return to New York Knicks