Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
stuporman wrote:Isn't it interesting how Trump files lawsuits because he wants to stop the counting of ballots in states he has a lead but not stop the count in ones he's behind....it's almost as if he's trying to meddle in the election so it isn't fair....hmm
Pointgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Pointgod wrote:
Good John James is a disingenuous hack.
do you have something specifically against James or his background or just because all republicans are hacks?
Just as a point of reference Republicans in Congress are all disingenuous hacks. Except for Mitch McConnell, he knows he’s a piece of **** and owns the villain role. John James 2000% kissed Trump’s ass and would have been another Trump acolyte. Also the fact that he was ducking the debate Peters because he’d have to defend his position on healthcare is weak.
mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:Pointgod wrote:
He’s actually filed lawsuits to stop in states where he’s behind as well. Just proves how **** stupid he is
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:Pointgod wrote:
He’s actually filed lawsuits to stop in states where he’s behind as well. Just proves how **** stupid he is
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
?mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:Pointgod wrote:
He’s actually filed lawsuits to stop in states where he’s behind as well. Just proves how **** stupid he is
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
Pointgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
No that makes no sense. Both the Democrats and GOP have Poll watchers who are there to observe the count. Why would Trump’s people need to show up? It’s flinging **** at the wall to please Trump. Hope they got paid up front.
SelbyCobra wrote:Oscirus wrote:Knick4Real wrote:
Good point!
With Trump out of the way, Senators would be able to vote their conscience instead of being fearful of a Trump backlash.
Imagine an unfiltered Trump getting in yo ass. I dont believe for a second that citizen trump will be quiet or that he wont have an influence on what his party does.
This is the realest isht right here. Trump has 38% (or whatever it is) of the country believing and following whatever he says or whatever idea he pushes, without any critical examination or thought. There's zero chance he walks away from all that adulation.
He's going to pardon everyone, maybe even himself somehow, get comfortable somewhere, and then wile out with no checks or a modicum of restraint for the next four years, roiling politics from the outside and invigorating the 38%, before running again in 2024 (or having one of his sons run as his proxy).
? Clyde_Style wrote:mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
This is idiotic. You don't get to stand over poll workers and validate every one of their actions. Seriously man, this is incredibly stupid. The states certify themselves. If you're going to challenge the results you would do it AFTER the tally is made in order to litigate for a recount, but to do it during the count with the presupposition that YOU, the candidate, should have your proxies validate the counting process as it happening is m0r0nic. Even if you did get a recount, it still has to observed by mediating parties, not your partisan stand-ins.
stuporman wrote:AZ update coming within the hour, might even be called I guess.
Knick4Real wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:Oscirus wrote:Imagine an unfiltered Trump getting in yo ass. I dont believe for a second that citizen trump will be quiet or that he wont have an influence on what his party does.
This is the realest isht right here. Trump has 38% (or whatever it is) of the country believing and following whatever he says or whatever idea he pushes, without any critical examination or thought. There's zero chance he walks away from all that adulation.
He's going to pardon everyone, maybe even himself somehow, get comfortable somewhere, and then wile out with no checks or a modicum of restraint for the next four years, roiling politics from the outside and invigorating the 38%, before running again in 2024 (or having one of his sons run as his proxy).
Trump might be able to get a pardon that excuses him from federal charges -- but presidential pardons have ZERO effect on state charges. NY State has been waiting YEARS for him to be a regular citizen again so they can put him behind bars for myriad state crimes. Unless they all accept his collect calls from jail, he won't be able to communicate much with his MAGA fanatics while behind bars.
stuporman wrote:AZ update coming within the hour, might even be called I guess.
stuporman wrote:AZ update coming within the hour, might even be called I guess.
Pointgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
No that makes no sense. Both the Democrats and GOP have Poll watchers who are there to observe the count. Why would Trump’s people need to show up? It’s flinging **** at the wall to please Trump. Hope they got paid up front.
stuporman wrote:mpharris36 wrote:stuporman wrote:
I think he intended to when he was ahead but by morning he wasn't then didn't and instead turned to recount efforts but I'm only going on what I read online so I have no direct source for evidence.
to my understanding I think the lawsuits are for them to temporarily stop the counting until they can have there people verify they are legit. I don't believe he has any leg to stand on and states I don't believe have to comply unless the lawsuit is successful but I don't think the lawsuits are just to stop counting. Just wanted to clear that up.
So it wasn't to stop the counting like was said? I know he probably filed suits all over just to have the process started for whatever challenges he has available but WI and MI finished pretty quickly to short circuit that particular aspect.
?DaGawd wrote:stuporman wrote:AZ update coming within the hour, might even be called I guess.
Isn’t AZ already called?
DaGawd wrote:stuporman wrote:AZ update coming within the hour, might even be called I guess.
Isn’t AZ already called?