ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Knicks-Thunder

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,466
And1: 116,322
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#161 » by mpharris36 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:53 am

Slicin N Dicin wrote:I cant stand watching Elf, he's in Duhon territory for me...both of em have times where they can contribute but overall just gtfo


duhon actually passed the ball to his teammates.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
Jimmit79
Head Coach
Posts: 7,439
And1: 5,252
Joined: Mar 22, 2016
     

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#162 » by Jimmit79 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:55 am

DaGawd wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:We need to show promise but miss playoffs at the same time

We really could use a top 3 pick big time

Can’t have both
Knicks make playoffs Dallas or Clipper win top 5 pick it's possible it's not 0%

Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,031
And1: 136,418
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#163 » by god shammgod » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:55 am

Read on Twitter


you're wrong, he's ruining the team. rj keeping us in it with his 21 percent from 3. :lol:
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,165
And1: 136,362
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#164 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:55 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

ehhh he was ok. A couple garbage time baskets. He got into early foul trouble and we missed his production. I don't think he was engaged defensively. He looked slow all night (can't blame him) he is playing way to many minutes.

I just wouldn't classify as a "good" game. He was ok.

18/12/7 is good. He would’ve had another triple double if guys could hit their 3’s. Randle wasn’t why we lost. It was our guards.



Randle dominating the ball, and making slashers become shooters is part of why our offense sucks and you know it deep down inside.


Image

Nah you bugging. RJ has been slashing to the rim and he can’t hit **** at the rim. Same for Payton. Missing layups and jumpers. Just awful
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,049
And1: 56,080
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#165 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:55 am

mpharris36 wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

Do you watch the hornets? Devonte Graham cripples the charlotte offense. He shoots 13 times a game and makes 26% of his shots :lol:


The Hornets make 3 more threes per game than us :lol:


And funny enough, the Hornets have a 4 out 1 in team, we have a 3 out 2 in team :lol:


we have a 3 out 2?

more like a 0 out 5 team :lol:


Yes, it's still 3 out and 2 in, regardless of whether or not they can shoot.

You and I will never agree about Mitch, he's an awful rebounder for his size too, but that's never mentioned. If you replaced Randle or Mitch with a floor spacer, our offense would improve, it's that simple.
User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,485
And1: 42,672
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#166 » by 2010 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:56 am

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. I don’t like any lineup with Randle at C. We just lose all rim protection and revert back to being the Knicks of the past 20 years. We need Mitch or another rim protector (Noel or acquire one) in at all times. We are not a good enough shooting team to make up for giving up points with a wide open paint.
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Smart
2: White | Wallace | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,049
And1: 56,080
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#167 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:56 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:18/12/7 is good. He would’ve had another triple double if guys could hit their 3’s. Randle wasn’t why we lost. It was our guards.



Randle dominating the ball, and making slashers become shooters is part of why our offense sucks and you know it deep down inside.


Image

Nah you bugging. RJ has been slashing to the rim and he can’t hit **** at the rim. Same for Payton. Missing layups and jumpers. Just awful



RJ is shooting 58% at the rim.

Randle will always get his numbers, it's just the nature of dominating the ball.
Jimmit79
Head Coach
Posts: 7,439
And1: 5,252
Joined: Mar 22, 2016
     

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#168 » by Jimmit79 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:56 am

god shammgod wrote:
Read on Twitter


you're wrong, he's ruining the team. rj keeping us in it with his 21 percent from 3.
RJ is only 20 so 21 percent is improvement once he turns 50 it will be 51% from 3 point range.

Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
User avatar
KnicksChamps
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,189
And1: 1,313
Joined: Aug 08, 2009
   

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#169 » by KnicksChamps » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:57 am

mpharris36 wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:

ehhh he was ok. A couple garbage time baskets. He got into early foul trouble and we missed his production. I don't think he was engaged defensively. He looked slow all night (can't blame him) he is playing way to many minutes.

I just wouldn't classify as a "good" game. He was ok.

18/12/7 is good. He would’ve had another triple double if guys could hit their 3’s. Randle wasn’t why we lost. It was our guards.


I never said he was the reason we lost. I just wouldn't classify it as a good game. He has played games where he was 5-16 from the floor which I thought he was more effective. He was ISO'ing a bit more tonight and like I said he wasn't really engaged defensively.

He was far down the list of players to blame tonight though.


Agreed. I know we've been spoiled by his insane production so far, and that may slightly skew our perception of his performance tonight, but that's exactly it - we've seen his capability to REALLY run the offense - and that was missing tonight due to several things. The only thing I would fault him for is the increased ISO ball today (shots fell in the 3rd...) but I didn't quite feel that sense of pride/confidence when he had the ball today.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,031
And1: 136,418
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#170 » by god shammgod » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:58 am

Jimmit79 wrote:
god shammgod wrote:
Read on Twitter


you're wrong, he's ruining the team. rj keeping us in it with his 21 percent from 3.
RJ is only 20 so 21 percent is improvement once he turns 50 it will be 51% from 3 point range.

Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk


that only it works if you go up though. he was at 32 percent last year.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,165
And1: 136,362
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#171 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:58 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

Randle dominating the ball, and making slashers become shooters is part of why our offense sucks and you know it deep down inside.


Image

Nah you bugging. RJ has been slashing to the rim and he can’t hit **** at the rim. Same for Payton. Missing layups and jumpers. Just awful



RJ is shooting 58% at the rim.

Randle will always get his numbers, it's just the nature of dominating the ball.

RJ sure didn’t shoot 58% at the rim tonight :lol:
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
KnicksChamps
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,189
And1: 1,313
Joined: Aug 08, 2009
   

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#172 » by KnicksChamps » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:59 am

2010 wrote:I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. I don’t like any lineup with Randle at C. We just lose all rim protection and revert back to being the Knicks of the past 20 years. We need Mitch or another rim protector (Noel or acquire one) in at all times. We are not a good enough shooting team to make up for giving up points with a wide open paint.


Yup. Entire 4th quarter was a prime example. Sure, he can guard a 5 in the post and do what he's assigned to do, but at what cost? Bums driving through the center of the paint for an uncontested dunk?

There was no excuse for not having Mitch/Noel in the game for all 48 minutes tonight. I hope Thibs realized this strategy simply will not work with our current lineup, and never tries it again.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,466
And1: 116,322
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#173 » by mpharris36 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:59 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
The Hornets make 3 more threes per game than us :lol:


And funny enough, the Hornets have a 4 out 1 in team, we have a 3 out 2 in team :lol:


we have a 3 out 2?

more like a 0 out 5 team :lol:


Yes, it's still 3 out and 2 in, regardless of whether or not they can shoot.

You and I will never agree about Mitch, he's an awful rebounder for his size too, but that's never mentioned. If you replaced Randle or Mitch with a floor spacer, our offense would improve, it's that simple.


Mitch is actually boxing out this year. It is planned he is sacrificing for the team. Do you see how many easy defensive rebound/payton/RJ get right under the hoop. I have been very critical of Mitch's rebounding in the past. This year he is blocking out much better. The rebound numbers don't both me. He is going his job on the glass and his guys aren't getting OFF rebounds.

It matter though that our guys can't shoot...because the paint is protected. Mitch isn't going to create his own offense, we know that. Most center don't. We have the worst shooting starting lineup in the NBA...that is the reason our offense stinks
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,049
And1: 56,080
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#174 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:01 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Nah you bugging. RJ has been slashing to the rim and he can’t hit **** at the rim. Same for Payton. Missing layups and jumpers. Just awful



RJ is shooting 58% at the rim.

Randle will always get his numbers, it's just the nature of dominating the ball.

RJ sure didn’t shoot 58% at the rim tonight :lol:



Guess who else is shooting 58% at the rim this year though, Julius Deion Randle 8-)
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,165
And1: 136,362
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#175 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:05 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

RJ is shooting 58% at the rim.

Randle will always get his numbers, it's just the nature of dominating the ball.

RJ sure didn’t shoot 58% at the rim tonight :lol:



Guess who else is shooting 58% at the rim this year though, Julius Deion Randle 8-)

I’m talking about tonight though. RJ was just flat out horrible. Layups, jumpers and tunnel vision. You really can’t blame Randle for that.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,049
And1: 56,080
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#176 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:10 am

mpharris36 wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
we have a 3 out 2?

more like a 0 out 5 team :lol:


Yes, it's still 3 out and 2 in, regardless of whether or not they can shoot.

You and I will never agree about Mitch, he's an awful rebounder for his size too, but that's never mentioned. If you replaced Randle or Mitch with a floor spacer, our offense would improve, it's that simple.


Mitch is actually boxing out this year. It is planned he is sacrificing for the team. Do you see how many easy defensive rebound/payton/RJ get right under the hoop. I have been very critical of Mitch's rebounding in the past. This year he is blocking out much better. The rebound numbers don't both me. He is going his job on the glass and his guys aren't getting OFF rebounds.

It matter though that our guys can't shoot...because the paint is protected. Mitch isn't going to create his own offense, we know that. Most center don't. We have the worst shooting starting lineup in the NBA...that is the reason our offense stinks



He's not a good rebounder, you can try and make excuses for it but that is just a fact. There are plenty of times he gets shoved under the rim by a big.


He's a defensive player sure, but he does hurt us on offense, the guards aren't good shooters but they also can't drive to the hoop nearly as often as other players because there's almost always a help defender rotating to contest the shot. Whether that's Randles man or Mitch, as a frontcourt they are both interior bound playing with guys who are predominantly slashers. You can't recognize that they aren't good shooters, then be upset at them for missing when they're constantly put in a position to catch and shoot.
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,014
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#177 » by Chanel Bomber » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:11 am

I (re)watched Aliens tonight and it filled me with more joy and positivity than a Knicks loss.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,049
And1: 56,080
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#178 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:14 am

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:RJ sure didn’t shoot 58% at the rim tonight :lol:



Guess who else is shooting 58% at the rim this year though, Julius Deion Randle 8-)

I’m talking about tonight though. RJ was just flat out horrible. Layups, jumpers and tunnel vision. You really can’t blame Randle for that.


Yes I can, Randle has the ball entirely too much, he's now 4th in the league in touches per game :lol:

This really is no different than Westbrook at this point, he gets his numbers and the team is just bad on offense. We're one of the slowest teams in the league, one of the worst offensive teams in the league, near the bottom in APG.....So, keep giving it to him?
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,165
And1: 136,362
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#179 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:18 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:

Guess who else is shooting 58% at the rim this year though, Julius Deion Randle 8-)

I’m talking about tonight though. RJ was just flat out horrible. Layups, jumpers and tunnel vision. You really can’t blame Randle for that.


Yes I can, Randle has the ball entirely too much, he's now 4th in the league in touches per game :lol:

This really is no different than Westbrook at this point, he gets his numbers and the team is just bad on offense. We're one of the slowest teams in the league, one of the worst offensive teams in the league, near the bottom in APG.....So, keep giving it to him?

RJ missing layups, jump shots and having tunnel vision isn’t a Randle problem. It’s funny when RJ plays well you aren’t saying anything about Randle but once RJ plays like schit it’s Randle’s fault again :lol:

Payton had one assist tonight. When he’s your starting point guard of course our APG is gonna be low. He never looks to pass.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,132
And1: 22,679
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: PG: Knicks-Thunder 

Post#180 » by RHODEY » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:19 am

mpharris36 wrote:
Slicin N Dicin wrote:I cant stand watching Elf, he's in Duhon territory for me...both of em have times where they can contribute but overall just gtfo


duhon actually passed the ball to his teammates.



Image

Return to New York Knicks