Grinditout wrote:Random unlikely scenario. The team ends up with #2 and #3. If you can, do you trade both for #1?
Sorry if this has been asked before
I’m staying at those picks and taking the Jalen duo with ease.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Grinditout wrote:Random unlikely scenario. The team ends up with #2 and #3. If you can, do you trade both for #1?
Sorry if this has been asked before
cgf wrote:WargamesX wrote:cgf wrote:Nope. If anything you trade down from one of them if the team at 4 or 5 really wants Mobley.
Or you see if #2 and Mitch is enough for #1 so you can Grab Cade and Mobley
I won't know until the GL gets going. But Mitch & 2 of Suggs/Green/Kuminga, sounds even more tempting than Cade & Mobley.
Grinditout wrote:Random unlikely scenario. The team ends up with #2 and #3. If you can, do you trade both for #1?
Sorry if this has been asked before
WargamesX wrote:cgf wrote:WargamesX wrote:
Or you see if #2 and Mitch is enough for #1 so you can Grab Cade and Mobley
I won't know until the GL gets going. But Mitch & 2 of Suggs/Green/Kuminga, sounds even more tempting than Cade & Mobley.
Yeah but we would need a center. Honestly I hope we have problems deciding on this real soon
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Grinditout wrote:Random unlikely scenario. The team ends up with #2 and #3. If you can, do you trade both for #1?
Sorry if this has been asked before

WargamesX wrote:Polk377 wrote:Praying the Draft Gods will look favorably upon us for improved decision making and play by gifting us Jalen Suggs. He would be the perfect PG for this team and would be a dynamic backcourt partner with RJ.
Honestly it’s Cade. He would fit like a glove
IQ
RJ
Cade
Randle
Mitch
Then you try and draft the most dynamic scorer with the other pick.
Polk377 wrote:WargamesX wrote:Polk377 wrote:Praying the Draft Gods will look favorably upon us for improved decision making and play by gifting us Jalen Suggs. He would be the perfect PG for this team and would be a dynamic backcourt partner with RJ.
Honestly it’s Cade. He would fit like a glove
IQ
RJ
Cade
Randle
Mitch
Then you try and draft the most dynamic scorer with the other pick.
Not that impressed by Cunningham to be honest. Don't see his game translating as well to the NBA when he isn't one of the biggest guys on the court. Handle lacks fluidity and craftiness to really be a guard at the next level. He is a poor man's Ben Simmons with a jumper.
Suggs is a bulldog (no pun intended) on both ends of the floor and has the speed, athleticism, size and IQ to be a top lead guard in the NBA. I see streaks of D Wade and D Rose in him. He makes others around him better.
Suggs
Quickly
Barrett
Randle
Robinson
do you go Mobley and take Green or go Suggs & Green?DowNY wrote:Grinditout wrote:Random unlikely scenario. The team ends up with #2 and #3. If you can, do you trade both for #1?
Sorry if this has been asked before
I’m staying at those picks and taking the Jalen duo with ease.
3toheadmelo wrote:He’s gonna look a lot better in the pros with better spacing. Such a talented scorer
LibertyKnicks00 wrote:do you go Mobley and take Green or go Suggs & Green?DowNY wrote:Grinditout wrote:Random unlikely scenario. The team ends up with #2 and #3. If you can, do you trade both for #1?
Sorry if this has been asked before
I’m staying at those picks and taking the Jalen duo with ease.
I like Quickley as our lead guard. I think I’d take Mobley and trade Robinson for 2022 draft picks and keep building leverage. And hope we have the same problem in 2022
Go with
Immanuel Quickley
Jalen Green
R.J. Barrett
Julius Randle
Evan Mobley
cgf wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Juco24 wrote:
Melo, I remember you and Chanel Bomber being high on Quickley last year... who's your top 10 right now along with a sleeper or two? Just curious...
1. Cade
2. Green
3. Suggs
4. Kuminga
5. Ziarie
6. Mobley
7. Bouknight
8. Jalen Johnson
9.Scottie Barnes
10. Kispert
My top 4 is solidified right now. After that it’s up in the air. But for now that’s what I would have it as.
Not a Moody fan?

3toheadmelo wrote:cgf wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:1. Cade
2. Green
3. Suggs
4. Kuminga
5. Ziarie
6. Mobley
7. Bouknight
8. Jalen Johnson
9.Scottie Barnes
10. Kispert
My top 4 is solidified right now. After that it’s up in the air. But for now that’s what I would have it as.
Not a Moody fan?
He’s ok. I’d take him in late lottery or mid first. Not a big fan of guards with limited handles
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Polk377 wrote:WargamesX wrote:Polk377 wrote:Praying the Draft Gods will look favorably upon us for improved decision making and play by gifting us Jalen Suggs. He would be the perfect PG for this team and would be a dynamic backcourt partner with RJ.
Honestly it’s Cade. He would fit like a glove
IQ
RJ
Cade
Randle
Mitch
Then you try and draft the most dynamic scorer with the other pick.
Not that impressed by Cunningham to be honest. Don't see his game translating as well to the NBA when he isn't one of the biggest guys on the court. Handle lacks fluidity and craftiness to really be a guard at the next level. He is a poor man's Ben Simmons with a jumper.
Suggs is a bulldog (no pun intended) on both ends of the floor and has the speed, athleticism, size and IQ to be a top lead guard in the NBA. I see streaks of D Wade and D Rose in him. He makes others around him better.
Suggs
Quickly
Barrett
Randle
Robinson




2010 wrote:When is the last time Leon Rose actually spoke? Has he ever given the rationale behind the Toppin/Quickley picks?
At this point we still have no idea what the front office's philosophy is when evaluating picks.
2010 wrote:I'm reading some terrible takes in here this morning.
• Cade is only excelling due to his size in college
• Suggs is only succeeding due to being at Gonzaga
• Moody has no handle
• Ziaire is better than Suggs
I guess we've reached that point where cats have said so much about prospects that now they're bored and gotta start reaching with their commentary.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.