3toheadmelo wrote:Really nasty people trying to discredit Randle’s contributions to winning this game. I can’t wait till we get rid of Obi so y’all can leave with him!
Clutch 3 and clutch rebound agreed but…Brunson carried late.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
3toheadmelo wrote:Really nasty people trying to discredit Randle’s contributions to winning this game. I can’t wait till we get rid of Obi so y’all can leave with him!
F N 11 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Really nasty people trying to discredit Randle’s contributions to winning this game. I can’t wait till we get rid of Obi so y’all can leave with him!
Clutch 3 and clutch rebound agreed but…Brunson carried late.

RHODEY wrote:He doesn't play him at the 3 because even though Obi is a great straight line athlete he lacks the lateral movement to guard 3s effectively.HighRyzer83 wrote:RHODEY wrote:Hes not soft , he's a tweener,told to go stand in the corner, playing in a system not suited to his strengths... backing up an all-star that takes away his opportunity to play substantial minutes. Im not not mad at Obi, we've seen what he can do, I'm mad at the front office.
Not sure why thibs absolutely refuses to play Obi at the 3 like the life of his kids depends on it. We need a 3, Obi is a dynamic athlete that can shoot, but completely sacrilegious to even try it for any significant amount of time for some reason. I think this is another one of those moves thibs will take a lifetime to figure out and then gets credit for finally figuring out.
3toheadmelo wrote:F N 11 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Really nasty people trying to discredit Randle’s contributions to winning this game. I can’t wait till we get rid of Obi so y’all can leave with him!
Clutch 3 and clutch rebound agreed but…Brunson carried late.
yes brunson was great as well. it’s just nice to see Randle starting to make clutch plays as of recent since he’s been pretty bad in that area