JayTWill wrote:aq_ua wrote:ctorres wrote:
Monica McNutt kept it real. On ESPN today, she explained it from the perspective that the team had outgrown Thibs.
And yet the candidate pool for replacements seem to be a bunch of player development focused coaches. I don’t buy it - we’re hiring an established NBA coach or it was a big mistake.
What's wrong with a developmental coach? We are probably going to need some of the younger guys to contribute and wouldn't mind if KAT learned how to set a screen or if Brunson learned how to run a 2 man game or if OG learned how to dribble and chew gum or if Mikal learned how to fight over a screen again or if Hart or Mitch developed a single reliable skill outside of rebounding

But seriously if we keep this roster together we are going to need them to be better players than they have shown themselves to be this past season. With the limited assets the team has to improve they will need to find a way to squeeze every bit of juice out of the roster from making better use of the players together to individual improvements of the players. Thibs was an established coach and far from a developmental guy.
Our core is anywhere between 28 and 30, in the primes of their career and very much solidified in what they do. I don’t think it’s realistic to expect these guys to suddenly develop a new skill or master à weakness they’ve struggled with their whole career. Player development implies working with and focusing on improving our younger talent, which means playing time and living with the challenges and failings of the youth. That flies in the cave of what is presumably being viewed as a window to compete for a championship and maximizing the core veteran talent we have.
Guys like Bryant and the college coaches might be great at getting our younger guys into the rotation, but it would be foolish to believe that a first year NBA coach would be better than Thibs at getting this closer to a championship.