So Nash for head coach?
if we are getting Durant for KAT, I need picks back...
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
KnixinSix wrote:AD/KAT/Huk
KAT/AD/OG
OG/MLE (Simmons/Oubre/Trent Jr, Beasley- pick one)/ Dadiet or McCullar
MLE/McBride/ Wright
Brunson/ Wright/ Kolek
sol537 wrote:3-team trade where KD and picks go to the NYK and KAT goes to PHX. You know Booker’s going to to sign that fat extension and then demand to play with his boy KAT if KD is going out in a trade anyway. We should squeeze every last pick out of them since Ishbia is calling the shots.
KnixinSix wrote:sol537 wrote:3-team trade where KD and picks go to the NYK and KAT goes to PHX. You know Booker’s going to to sign that fat extension and then demand to play with his boy KAT if KD is going out in a trade anyway. We should squeeze every last pick out of them since Ishbia is calling the shots.
This is not a team trying to infuse draft picks into a lineup (though I suppose they can be traded). KAT is 3 years,controlled. KD 1 and then you can lose him for nothing. I like it but not for KAT. For Bridges who also has only 1 year left, Mitch with 1 year left and Hart.
Fury wrote:KnixinSix wrote:sol537 wrote:3-team trade where KD and picks go to the NYK and KAT goes to PHX. You know Booker’s going to to sign that fat extension and then demand to play with his boy KAT if KD is going out in a trade anyway. We should squeeze every last pick out of them since Ishbia is calling the shots.
This is not a team trying to infuse draft picks into a lineup (though I suppose they can be traded). KAT is 3 years,controlled. KD 1 and then you can lose him for nothing. I like it but not for KAT. For Bridges who also has only 1 year left, Mitch with 1 year left and Hart.
We cannot afford the depth hit. It’s either KAT or no trade.
god shammgod wrote:Spree2Houston wrote:Durant has averaged 55 games played a season since 2020 season. I’m not even counting the year he sat out because of his achillies injury. He’s going to be 37 in September and not getting any healthier. The only reason to justify trading for KD would be creating Cap Space next offseason to go after Luka
and kat has averaged 57 in that same time frame
ctorres wrote:Fury wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
This is not a team trying to infuse draft picks into a lineup (though I suppose they can be traded). KAT is 3 years,controlled. KD 1 and then you can lose him for nothing. I like it but not for KAT. For Bridges who also has only 1 year left, Mitch with 1 year left and Hart.
We cannot afford the depth hit. It’s either KAT or no trade.
KAT to a 3rd team for depth?
What if KAT goes to San Antonio, Durant to NY, and San Antonio sends a collection of players
Wemby and KAT would be niiiice
sol537 wrote:If you trade for KD you do so with the understanding that he’d extend at a lower yearly amount year to year or at least one additional year. Then those picks that we’d have to get from PHX could be used for depth trades.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:JayTWill wrote:When is the last time a 37 year old led a team to a championship with his scoring as a primary option? Kareem in the mid 80's?
Brunson would still be the number 1 option. He's a more well rounded offensive player than Durant at this stage.
KD has basically become an elite shooter. He rarely gets to the rim anymore.
mpharris36 wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:god shammgod wrote:
you have to ask yourself how confident are you really in this current core winning it all ? does playing it safe accomplish what you really want or just give you a longer window of being pretty good but not good enough ?
We do need to make some moves. It all depends what else is out there. And at least for me, have to think of what the plan is after next year with KDd contract. If there's some flexibility in there then it makes more sense, vs if we are screwed and it's just for a one year window I would pass
KD is an upgrade, but not completely sold he is that big of an upgrade. Still a really good player but also on the decline
He would have to agree to an extension of some sort. Knicks haven't operated with letting someone get to free agency.
Similarly we probably know pretty quickly if Mikal is staying or going. He will get his extension if he doesn't take it he will probably be on the trade block (they didn't trade all those picks to risk that). Similar situation with Mitch
The knicks won't be operating as a team under the cap so losing KD 50 MM the following year we won't be able to get cap space from losing him. It would basically go into the abyss.
JayTWill wrote:mpharris36 wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:
We do need to make some moves. It all depends what else is out there. And at least for me, have to think of what the plan is after next year with KDd contract. If there's some flexibility in there then it makes more sense, vs if we are screwed and it's just for a one year window I would pass
KD is an upgrade, but not completely sold he is that big of an upgrade. Still a really good player but also on the decline
He would have to agree to an extension of some sort. Knicks haven't operated with letting someone get to free agency.
Similarly we probably know pretty quickly if Mikal is staying or going. He will get his extension if he doesn't take it he will probably be on the trade block (they didn't trade all those picks to risk that). Similar situation with Mitch
The knicks won't be operating as a team under the cap so losing KD 50 MM the following year we won't be able to get cap space from losing him. It would basically go into the abyss.
If they did let KD walk and let Mikal and Mitch walk or traded them for an expiring and some draft assets or cheap players I believe the only major contracts they would have on the books are Brunson and OG for around $80M and Hart's expiring for almost $21M. I see the cap at $170 next offseason.
I'm not suggesting that they should do it but would provide an option to make a true pivot from this current core. They could also trade Hart for an expiring this year and keep Mikal while still having a decent amount of money to throw at another player. There are some options if KD walks I believe.
Context wrote:Trading for KD is old Knicks that some of you are afraid of. I think KD looks like bad energy if you ask me.
Barcs wrote:Context wrote:Trading for KD is old Knicks that some of you are afraid of. I think KD looks like bad energy if you ask me.
Yup. Trading for superstars at the very tail end of their career for the decline is same ol' knicks. Terrifying that they are thinking about moving multiple dudes in their prime for 36 year old KD.