Hes_On_Fire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hes_On_Fire wrote:The general rule is that if you feel uneasy or just plain bad about a trade then it likely isn’t a good trade.
This trade has had mixed reactions across the board here, in the general public, in basketball media, etc.
We locked into an absolutely horrible contract for a minimum of the next 3 years - the 4th year will be expiring and possibly more tradeable. The guy is always hurt, plays soft and is paid almost as much as our captain and Bridges combined. He spaces the floor - that’s great - but his mentality on and off the court doesn’t fit with the culture we built. This is square peg in a round hole. This has massive failure potential on it - and if it fails, we destroyed any window of winning a title with Brunson.
Not many people seem to dislike the trade and except yourself and the usual suspects.
Didn't you hate the Brunson trade too?
Melo, you have receipts on this?
So, we should have stayed the course with Randle and Donte? That was a true contender with Brunson? Not sure of that either. And then Randle was due an extension or new contract.
Karl Anthony Towns is not the player you think of when trying to elevate into a title contender.
I wasn’t a Randle fan, but this is a more expensive Randle in some ways, just with a different mentality.
The usual suspects lol. The respected basketball media - not Kendrick Perkins - is lukewarm on the trade. Mixed reactions on this forum and in the media as I said. Didn’t say everyone disliked it. I said mixed reactions. You’re better off sticking to making troll posts if you’re write bull.
And yeah, please Melo bring up the receipts of me wanting Brunson way before anyone even considered wanting him. Let’s see those receipts. They’re there. Now let’s see yours. Probably a lot more bull than mine. A lot more. But yours is under the guise of being ‘positive’, right? Gtfo.
Towns > Randle