Jeff Van Gully wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:
just want to see the kid continue to develop.
i'm not on some tanking, but i would love to see some coagulation with our young nucleus.
DSJ, RJ, frank, knox, randle, mitch all securely in the rotation and growing together should be what we see. vets to fortify them, not take away.
play to win, but not at their expense. they could all be keepers.
+Trier, + Iggy
not counting them or dot out. i was just thinking of the core rotation players to a winner. they might not quite be my focus. but i do want them to play and continue to develop. trier can be a bucket when he isn't jr smithing.
Probably a bit of semantics here, but I don't rule Trier out anymore than I'd rule Frank or Knox or Mitch or DSJr in, with a "bye" on RJ and Iggy, as they haven't played an NBA game yet, though obviously there is the strong assumption that a guy drafted #3 is being looked at carefully to be part of the core in the future.
I don't see Knox or Frank, especially, as any more "winning" players than Trier, in that all are flawed, and all are not exactly who they'll be in the future. Trier with the highest floor, lowest ceiling (maybe) of the 3, coming into the situation a bit older and with 3 years of college etc.
I do know that outside of KP, Trier was the first Knick rookie in a while to come in and just not be denied, in terms of getting to play and contributing.
Anyway, still agree with your overall point.
Again, like last year, though another step in the process, the Knicks are auditioning their role players and bench, if you will, hoping maybe RJ or Randle or anyone else steps up as a #1 or #2 type at some point, though I'd guess the Knicks figure that individual will come along in a lucky draft, or free agency, unless they feel it's RJ, but he'll need a couple of years.
Still, I like the approach of having a enough young guys to be a part of something for the next 5 years, while not capping the team out, and having some decent vets around the young guys.