NYKAL wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:I'd still prefer Thibs as a defensive coordinator to a different head coach, but oh well.
Other than his Chicago team that was FULL of defensive minded players (young Taj, Butler, Noah, ect), he's been at the bottom of the barrel defensively. This team has bigger vagina's than Towns when it comes to defense and being soft. He will break their spirits before making them good defenders.
The Twolves had a decent defensive rating at some point.
The players on this team who don't play defense and are soft can be sent packing. I'd like to assume that if Rose wants Thibs, he's also prepared to provide him with players that fit him.
There are lots of ways this could be decent and lots of ways it could be bad.
It's not about just the coach. It's about the coach and a competent FO and better yet, a competent FO that's in sync with the coach.
I mean, hey, lets chase a more modern coach like D'Antoni. Knicks never look into guys like that. Oh, they did.
Why is that illustrative? Because the team didn't give him enough talent, so coaching is only going to go so far, and then they didn't provide him with the kinds of players that execute his kind of style anyway.
I mean, D'Antoni looks good in Houston not because he's a genius, but mainly because he has Harden. Then again, D'Antoni at least knows how he wants to play with Harden and the FO supports it. Once he got Westbrook as well, then D'Antoni gets rid of Capella as with Westbrook, outside shooting took a bit of a hit and D'Antoni was committed to shooting existing at least 4 positions. If Westbrook/Capella, it would have been 3.
I don't think Thibs is a savior, but he's been a good defensive coach with a strong attention to detail. 3 point shooting is a concern.
None of it matters, Thibs, Messina, Becky Hammond, Stackhouse, whatever the f*cking flavor of the month is, if the FO can't actually evaluate and assemble talent.