omerome wrote:Im Coming Home wrote:omerome wrote:Ugh. What a horrible use of assets.
What's next? IQ for a top 20 protected first-round pick?
Whats great is, when all these picks convey, we'll just trade them for future picks again. Keep kicking that can!

Yeah, it really doesn't make sense.
Any smart GM/POBO would see that after you drafted a guy you hoped would take Randle's place after his disappointing season the season prior, and then seeing Randle having the best year of his career, would be to sell high on Obi and trade him for a future first or something. But wasting a top-ten pick just to come off the bench and watch as his value continually decreases is just bad asset management.
Why draft a guy if you don't even use him? Or why draft a guy who wasn't even the best fit for the team at the time? No one can even say that this is a hindsight statement because we all know guys who fit better were available to us than Obi prior to the draft.
I am quickly losing faith in our management because I just don't see what they're trying to do. We have a flawed team and it doesn't look like they're going to address our weaknesses (a solid wing who can play defense and shoot, and a backup PG).
The Obi mistake was 3 years ago. If anything we should be happy they finally cut losses now that there's zero place for him and that they took this L instead of continuing to prolong it.
Overall this front office has barely missed. Cam Reddish, Obi, and the last year on the Fournier contract are the only mistakes I can say from the last 4 years that I saw coming a mile away.