3toheadmelo wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:jokic is having the same type of season he had last season but this time denver worse than last year (3rd seed). i don't really see an argument for jokic over brunson
Denver have a better record than the Knicks, while playing in a tougher conference. So I really don't see how seeding is a factor when they're playing in two different conferences and one has a better team record. Denver's the 2 seed in the West anyway.
jokic is also playing on a loaded team and his stats are pretty much identical to last year. brunson has been carrying the team with all the injuries we had and still led us to a 2nd seed. what brunson has done to this knicks team has been way more impressive than jokic has done to the nuggets this season imo.
i also feel like the mvp race should be between brunson and sga
The Nuggets aren't that loaded. They have some good role players and Murray but Murray missed about a third of the regular season again and he's not a superstar either. They have great chemistry and Jokic is at the very center of it.
Jokic had one of the best RS ever last year and all the stats showed he should have won MVP over Embiid, so I don't see how having a similar season should be held against him.
You're just used to the Nuggets and Jokic being this good but consistency shouldn't be held against them in favor of novelty if they're better, which they are.
Jokic is the most impactful player in the NBA and the only players in the conversation with him this season are SGA (higher than Jokic in EPM for instance) and a healthy Embiid (who's not eligible).
Brunson has had a fantastic season but he is just not in the same stratosphere as them in terms of impact, and his team has a worse record than both Denver and OKC.
He should however be in the running for All-NBA first team. Come back to your senses bro
