NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Context wrote:JayTWill wrote:
The Mavs basically played an 8-man rotation with spot minutes for Powell and some guy I never heard of. Their bench was Dinwiddie, Hardy and Kleiber. The Knicks bench was Payne, McBride and Sims. Dinwiddie and Payne are comparable level players with Payne actually having the better year so far. I would choose Deuce over Hardy who is shooting terribly this year. The difference between Sims and whatever Kleiber has to offer at this stage of his career should not have made a huge difference in yesterday's game. The talent in our starting 5 was far superior than their talent.
I expect the Knicks team to improve as the season goes along but I don't know how you can look at yesterday's game and see some talent gap in favor of the Mavs or some superior chemistry of a group where 3 of 4 guys who scored 20 points just joined the roster this off-season.
The Mavs didnt lose any main player. We lost 3 and brought in two main players. And we brought in several non main players, BIG difference JayT...This isnt about my opinion- its about the fact. That core Mav team is the same. Luka and Gad had a day off. Thats not our situation...
on edit: they lost a main bench player in Derrick but as you can see Naji easily replaces him...
The Mavs were down 2 starters last night, there's no sanitizing this loss. The lineup we played yesterday has played more games together than that rag tag lineup the Mavs were using, that was only the 6th game Naji has started this year, and only the 42nd time he's started in his career.
the short handed new knicks lost to the defending western conference champs. period.




















