ImageImageImageImageImage

PG Knicks/Pistons

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,571
And1: 61,529
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#181 » by DOT » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:34 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:Not having KAT and Mitch play enough minutes together concerns me

KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,200
And1: 7,416
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#182 » by prophet_of_rage » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:37 pm

nedleeds wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:
HEZI wrote:
When is the last time an undersized backcourt like that worked? The roster will will leave you fixing one issue and creating another no matter how much you try
The last time? Maybe the 89-90 Pistons? But Dumars was 6'4 not 6'1.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Joe Dumars was all nba 1st team defense 5 times, finals mvp and walked into the hall of fame. Zeke wasc5 time all nba, 12 time all star, finals mvp. It worked because both walked into the hall of fame. We are so moribund and deranged we have deuce McBride in the same conversation as Dumars.
How so? I'm not advocating Deuce start. I know he is too small. That's what I've been saying.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,200
And1: 7,416
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#183 » by prophet_of_rage » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:39 pm

Wildcat wrote:Not nearly enough people are talking about how disappointing of a season Deuce is having. He's playing more minutes and his shooting numbers are down across the board.
Because they pinned the Boston loss on not having Deuce on the floor. It has been obvious all year Deuce isn't shooting well. He showed yesterday he cannot defend a guard under 6'3 whocxan score. So we have to not talk about him.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 77,489
And1: 54,351
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#184 » by MrDollarBills » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:42 pm

DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:Not having KAT and Mitch play enough minutes together concerns me

KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
louisorr
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,509
And1: 1,592
Joined: May 09, 2009

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#185 » by louisorr » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:44 pm

Wildcat wrote:Not nearly enough people are talking about how disappointing of a season Deuce is having. He's playing more minutes and his shooting numbers are down across the board.

Deuce started the season highly confident. Showed leadership, talking to rookies about playing hard for Thibs in garbage minutes. Then how was he rewarded? No consistency or trust from the coach. Guy got his chain yanked. It makes total sense that he’s having a rough season.
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,727
And1: 1,789
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#186 » by JayTWill » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:49 pm

prophet_of_rage wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:Your back court would be 6 feet tall. You saw Cade and them post up every Knicks perimeter defender because they are too small.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


But Thibs wouldn't put Hart on Cade. Mikal guarded Cade most of the time this year. Hart spent most of the last Pistons game guarding a limited offensive threat in Ausur Thompson and other off-ball players. Thibs tries to hide Hart off the ball defensively as much as possible. He could have attempted the same thing with Deuce this game but he chose not to.

Every time Cade got off the bench, Deuce got off the bench. That is the role Mikal has had much of the year. Thibs would never put Hart in that position. Cade would have had a length and also a quickness advantage over Hart too.
You can't hide Deuce and Brunson. Cade was cooking evwrybody down low. And then whoever was left had to deal with Harris 6'8 and Thomson 6'6. With 6'6 Beasley coming in.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


Cade went to work on McBride last night. Tatum went to work on Mikal the game before. Booker went to work on OG the game before that. What you won't see is a player going to work on Hart or Brunson very often because Thibs tries to hide them as much as possible off ball although it does feel like he has taken some of the defensive responsibility off of Mikal in the last month or so which may be part of the reason we saw Deuce on Cade all game instead of Mikal. If Thibs did put Hart on Cade, Tatum or Booker I have a strong feeling they would have went to work on him too.

I'm not a fan of undersized backcourts and was one of the few people that thought Grimes should have been placed back in the starting lineup in last January in place of DDV since I thought Grimes was a much better defensive backcourt pairing with Brunson and DDV offense and experience could have been used on the bench. I still wanted a bigger, stronger more versatile defender to pair with Brunson. Deuce is far from my ideal backcourt pairing with Brunson but Hart isn't either. He has plenty of his own defensive issues this year.

https://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612752&Season=2024-25&SeasonType=Regular%2BSeason&PlayerIds=1628404&OnlyCommonGames=true

https://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612752&Season=2024-25&SeasonType=Regular%2BSeason&PlayerIds=1628973,1630540,1628404&OnlyCommonGames=true

There is no indication that Hart is better defensively for the team especially when paired with Brunson. Hart is stronger but incredibly undersized also with other defensive limitations.
User avatar
rajajackal
General Manager
Posts: 7,687
And1: 9,844
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#187 » by rajajackal » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:51 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:Not having KAT and Mitch play enough minutes together concerns me

KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

also, kat was doing things like blocking out for mitch. he may suck at defense, but he puts in a more consistent effort than randle. having those two 7 footers down low is a totally different presence than mitch/randle gave us. i hoped kat at c would suffice, but i'm all in on the twin towers at this point
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,571
And1: 61,529
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#188 » by DOT » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:51 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
DOT wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:Not having KAT and Mitch play enough minutes together concerns me

KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

Like I said

You might as well have just kept Randle at that point.
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 11,776
And1: 12,609
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#189 » by Reign23 » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:56 pm

don't care tbh. 3 players out, 3rd seed basically locked... game meant nothing.
formerly known as knickst4pe
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 11,776
And1: 12,609
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#190 » by Reign23 » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:58 pm

damn just saw that the pacers are one game behind us. we HAVE to lose out here. 4th seed would be insane.
formerly known as knickst4pe
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,997
And1: 137,702
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#191 » by 3toheadmelo » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:03 pm

rajajackal wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
DOT wrote:KAT and Mitch together defeats the purpose of having KAT

Might as well have just kept Randle at that point.


KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

also, kat was doing things like blocking out for mitch. he may suck at defense, but he puts in a more consistent effort than randle. having those two 7 footers down low is a totally different presence than mitch/randle gave us. i hoped kat at c would suffice, but i'm all in on the twin towers at this point

Yeah idk about KAT giving effort. Too many times he is ball watching and does the laziest close outs ever. Thats why he’s literally graded at the bottom of centers on defense on metrics. We never had that problem before.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,813
And1: 43,388
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#192 » by TheGreenArrow » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:05 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,086
And1: 9,551
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#193 » by Gravy » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:10 pm

They said Deuce in the starting lineup would fix the shooting. If Deuce is going to shoot as bad as Hart then you may as well leave Hart in the sl to get you a triple double.
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,798
And1: 6,041
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#194 » by ctorres » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:23 pm

Reign23 wrote:damn just saw that the pacers are one game behind us. we HAVE to lose out here. 4th seed would be insane.


4th seed might be fine. We would face the Cavs in the Semis. Honestly, I don't know if that would be better or worse than the Celtics. Even though we beat the Cavs two years ago, they're a much better team now and they're going to be out for blood against us.

Could be a scenario where we beat Cavs in the semis, but face the Pacers in the ECF and the Pacers would have homecourt advantage. We might somehow lose to the Pacers and they go on to the Finals. They beat us last year in the Semis and the Knicks have homecourt advantage.

I'll be happy if we end up with a better regular season record than any of the Western teams other than the Thunder and Rockets.

If we miraculously make the Finals, we are going to need homecourt to have a chance at beating the Lakers, Nuggets, Clippers, Warriors, Grizzlies, or Timberwolves. So I think we should still win our remaining games to ensure we have homecourt against most of the Western Conference.
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,936
And1: 4,723
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#195 » by Wildcat » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:26 pm

louisorr wrote:
Wildcat wrote:Not nearly enough people are talking about how disappointing of a season Deuce is having. He's playing more minutes and his shooting numbers are down across the board.

Deuce started the season highly confident. Showed leadership, talking to rookies about playing hard for Thibs in garbage minutes. Then how was he rewarded? No consistency or trust from the coach. Guy got his chain yanked. It makes total sense that he’s having a rough season.


Not sure what season you're watching. He's the first guard off the bench to the point of awkwardness when he's coming in for JB. He got the starting PG nod when JB went down, and looked terrible at running the offense. This has nothing to do with Thibs and everything to do with Deuce.
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 8,092
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#196 » by nedleeds » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:31 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
<Brunson being a Chucker>

Fire thibs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Trade Brunson, OG, fire Thibs, tank every other year while the Nets harvest our organs. This team is roasted chicken for better, hungrier, harder, more well coached teams. Capped out, no picks, Thibs being an orc with no counter moves. Dolan needs to come down like an avenging angel and take the sword of wrath to CAA, Leon and Sammy Rose and burn the plague of CAA from this franchise.

ON THE ROAD TO BEING THE 2014 BOBCATS!!!!!!!!!!

starring

KAT as Al Jefferson (no defense playing parking cone offense only center)
Brunson as Kemba Walker (small guard who can't defend and chucks)
Josh Hart as MKG (the dullest utility knife in the drawer)
Five Pick Mik as Gerald Henderson (devourer of the lottery bound)
Mitch as Big Mac Biyombo (scorching the free throw line for 40%)

Coach Thibs as Steve Clifford (totally vanilla orc fossil coach who gets lapped every playoffs by anyone with internet access)
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,516
And1: 66,849
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#197 » by Guano » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:31 pm

Knicksfan1992 wrote:The Knicks tanked this game..

Brunson's ankle will be "sore" tomorrow.

KAT will have injury management.

We're trying to get to Cleveland's side of the bracket.

Wonder if Indiana recognizes and tanks themselves?


This is weak af and embarrassing if true.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,046
And1: 8,092
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#198 » by nedleeds » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:32 pm

Gravy wrote:They said Deuce in the starting lineup would fix the shooting. If Deuce is going to shoot as bad as Hart then you may as well leave Hart in the sl to get you a triple double.

They said Deuce was Joe Dumars.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,516
And1: 66,849
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#199 » by Guano » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:34 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

This is our captain and no runs in to defend him or push schroder out of the way???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Smfh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What the hell happened to the knicks we loved.


This sums up this season and our teams new culture perfectly.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,086
And1: 9,551
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: PG Knicks/Pistons 

Post#200 » by Gravy » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:39 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
rajajackal wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
KAT is defensively is a PF to me, Mitch is the guy who anchors and works better at the 5 in Tom's scheme.

Mitch/KAT/OG/Bridges/Brunson should be the play. If I'm gonna have a non shooter out there, let it be Mitch who defends and is a threat to finish.

also, kat was doing things like blocking out for mitch. he may suck at defense, but he puts in a more consistent effort than randle. having those two 7 footers down low is a totally different presence than mitch/randle gave us. i hoped kat at c would suffice, but i'm all in on the twin towers at this point

Yeah idk about KAT giving effort. Too many times he is ball watching and does the laziest close outs ever. Thats why he’s literally graded at the bottom of centers on defense on metrics. We never had that problem before.

KAT is Evan Fournier on defense at center, we were trying to figure out different ways to use Evan so he would be a net positive but he always limited the team's ceiling. Once Thibs benched him the headache was over. KAT is much better offensively but still gives the team too many problems to overcome and everybody else has to work harder.

Return to New York Knicks