TerrenceClarke wrote:mpharris36 wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:Also bringing up welker and smith is pointless cause 5'8 dudes have been proven to ball. But none have been taken with such a high second rounder at that point it becomes did we get the best value for robinson and I have to say no, as much as I want him to pan out. Smith was drafted in the third. Welker was undrafted. Tyreeke was drafted in the 5th.
So with Robinson it comes down to value of where he was taken.
but the game has also changed. What the league values is different then when those guys were drafted
Smallish QB's would never be taken high years ago. Now height is rarely a factor for QB's. With offensive spreading out and going more horizontal than vertical. Its about getting your playmakers the ball in space and getting it out fast.
still doesn't mean much to me as that does not mean you start drafting them so high. Its basically the same thing with Barkley. We draft hi way to high. Is Barkley good player to have sure, but not where he was picked at.
The Odds of 5'8 WR's being successful is RARE in the NFL which is why people cant name to many people so that means 99% of them are nothing in the League. That to me holds more weight than anything. Again the dude can be drafted but no way can you slice it his value was there.
And regards to whom or what heigh is still a factor for QB, the smaller ones are rarely desirable over the taller ones. Thats a bad point. There is no trend of Tiny WRs being drafted so high my dude.
I mean thats a totally different scenario. A RB should never be picked in the top half of the 1st round (let alone the #2 overall pick). RB have zero positional value. WR are getting paid more and more where you do want cheap productive WR's in your WR room.
Just like centers shouldn't be picked high and safeties shouldn't be picked high either. Especially when you don't have a foundation set.
Top tier positional value are
QB
OT
Edge
CB
and WR is making its way into that group now with what these WR's are getting paid in FA.
The draft is no over so whether he is small or not it all depends if he is productive or not. Schoen at least deserves a year or two until he proves he is not a good drafter. I will give him the benefit of the doubt until he proves otherwise.



































