ImageImageImageImageImage

2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath

Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36

Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,218
And1: 24,526
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1801 » by Pointgod » Wed Dec 23, 2020 5:37 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:Trump just punked Mitch and said he wants $2,000 checks.

Sounds like Donnie wants to line MAGA pockets to get more donations while he can.

Well, I hope it happens regardless of motive.



And Pelosi called him out on it :lol:

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


I'm not a big fan of Schumer, but I feel Pelosi has been far more resilient in the face of sheer madness than she gets credit for.

She pounced immediately. Bluff called.

I don't see how Mitch can get away from this now. Besides, it is from the printing press. Fiscal prudence is not what the GOP practices so I think they'll agree


There are a lot of legitimate criticisms of Schumer and Pelosi but I feel like most people that criticize them have no clue how literally impossible it is to get anything done when one party only lives to obstruct. Remember Republicans have 2 out of 3 branches of Congress. Trump can’t do **** if McConnell won’t bring it to the floor and McConnell can’t pass anything through unless Trump signed it. The advantage is always 2-1 Republicans. However since Trump states he wanted 2000 dollar checks Pelosi smartly took advantage and set a plan in motion to bring it to the floor. That only happens because on that issue because of Trump, now McConnell is outnumbered 2-1. People legitimately want Schumer and Pelosi to magically force McConnell to do something with zero leverage.

This article should be require reading to understand the asymmetrical warfare between the two parties and why Democrats can’t just act like Republicans.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/05/01/why-democrats-govern-and-republicans-obstruct/
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,530
And1: 9,536
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1802 » by Oscirus » Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:00 am

Pointgod wrote:
Oscirus wrote:If this is true, not as mad at the domestic stuff, but still

Read on Twitter


This is why people shouldn’t get their takes from social media and Twitter. Remember the Covid package was attached to a government spending bill so I’m going to assume a lot of this stuff that you see for foreign aid was already part of the normal government bill. Same thing can be said for the wall funding. The domestic stuff I’m not sure if it was part of the covid bill or regular government spending. The media needs to do a better job educating and explaining how this works to people because I see so much misunderstanding of this on Twitter.

Regardless, its a bad look to have a biden backed bill loaded with pork while giving the american public table scraps. Now Trump just out-maneuvered the dems using this info and they seem to be taking the brunt of the anger for this failure. Mind you this talk about more money will likely fail and trump knows this, but on his way out the door, he can say he fought for more money while the dems wouldnt budge. If biden signs this bill cuz trump wouldnt, talk about starting off on the wrong foot
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1803 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Dec 23, 2020 8:56 am

Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:

And Pelosi called him out on it :lol:

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


I'm not a big fan of Schumer, but I feel Pelosi has been far more resilient in the face of sheer madness than she gets credit for.

She pounced immediately. Bluff called.

I don't see how Mitch can get away from this now. Besides, it is from the printing press. Fiscal prudence is not what the GOP practices so I think they'll agree


There are a lot of legitimate criticisms of Schumer and Pelosi but I feel like most people that criticize them have no clue how literally impossible it is to get anything done when one party only lives to obstruct. Remember Republicans have 2 out of 3 branches of Congress. Trump can’t do **** if McConnell won’t bring it to the floor and McConnell can’t pass anything through unless Trump signed it. The advantage is always 2-1 Republicans. However since Trump states he wanted 2000 dollar checks Pelosi smartly took advantage and set a plan in motion to bring it to the floor. That only happens because on that issue because of Trump, now McConnell is outnumbered 2-1. People legitimately want Schumer and Pelosi to magically force McConnell to do something with zero leverage.

This article should be require reading to understand the asymmetrical warfare between the two parties and why Democrats can’t just act like Republicans.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/05/01/why-democrats-govern-and-republicans-obstruct/


Trust me, I completely understand and appreciate Republican obstruction. But please explain to me - or refer to an authoritative article on - why (1) the democrats passed up the $1.8 billion offer, and (2) didn't negotiate harder with a desperate Mitch McConnell on the $900 billion package?
User avatar
Thepaintismine
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 107
Joined: Apr 17, 2020
       

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1804 » by Thepaintismine » Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:15 am

Trump or no Trump, give us peeps $2,000 each, not no $600. That is an insult as we watch governors passing these totalitarian unconstitutional lockdowns and can't live free... Yo.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1805 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:29 am

My main man Trump has threatened to veto that POS bill unless congress adds a $2,000 stimulus check. MAGA baby all the way. I can't believe how the democrats and China rigged the voting machines against him. The damn election was RIGGED very bigly!

$2,000.00 baby, living for the citay

Image
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,635
And1: 30,845
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1806 » by Jeff Van Gully » Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:31 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
omerome wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:Trump just punked Mitch and said he wants $2,000 checks.

Sounds like Donnie wants to line MAGA pockets to get more donations while he can.

Well, I hope it happens regardless of motive.

MAGA people are confused about who to hate now.

Do they admit that the GOP clearly didn't give a phuck about them with this insult of a $600 check? Which by the way, it's not even per month. Or do they admit that the resident once again has shown he clearly didn't give a phuck about them and not fight harder to get them a larger amount instead of just via a tweet? They voted for this.

Either way, they should be renamed the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.

Read on Twitter


:lol:

That's the problem with people who spend all of their time consuming conspiracies: everything is so contrived to build up their Us vs. Them fantasies that anyone who dares to deviate from the Us camp is automatically relegated to the Them camp. it is the only way to keep their minds from breaking into irreconcilable pieces.


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/we-no-longer-need-to-engage-with-trumps-die-hard-supporters/617449/
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1807 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Dec 23, 2020 11:49 am

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
omerome wrote:MAGA people are confused about who to hate now.

Do they admit that the GOP clearly didn't give a phuck about them with this insult of a $600 check? Which by the way, it's not even per month. Or do they admit that the resident once again has shown he clearly didn't give a phuck about them and not fight harder to get them a larger amount instead of just via a tweet? They voted for this.

Either way, they should be renamed the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.

Read on Twitter


:lol:

That's the problem with people who spend all of their time consuming conspiracies: everything is so contrived to build up their Us vs. Them fantasies that anyone who dares to deviate from the Us camp is automatically relegated to the Them camp. it is the only way to keep their minds from breaking into irreconcilable pieces.


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/we-no-longer-need-to-engage-with-trumps-die-hard-supporters/617449/


I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,635
And1: 30,845
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1808 » by Jeff Van Gully » Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:17 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
:lol:

That's the problem with people who spend all of their time consuming conspiracies: everything is so contrived to build up their Us vs. Them fantasies that anyone who dares to deviate from the Us camp is automatically relegated to the Them camp. it is the only way to keep their minds from breaking into irreconcilable pieces.


https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/we-no-longer-need-to-engage-with-trumps-die-hard-supporters/617449/


I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:


right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1809 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:47 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:


I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:


right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?


I think we proceed by winning the two Georgia seats and then Biden and a group of - hopefully - bipartisan group of Senators and Congresspersons steps up and goes bold with programs that will reach rural and blue collar working class folks.

I hope I’m addressing your issue.
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,635
And1: 30,845
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1810 » by Jeff Van Gully » Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:59 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:


right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?


I think we proceed by winning the two Georgia seats and then Biden and a group of - hopefully - bipartisan group of Senators and Congresspersons steps up and goes bold with programs that will reach rural and blue collar working class folks.

I hope I’m addressing your issue.


oh, i have no issue. and our goals there are aligned. and i agree that all along everyone needed to be listening to and caring for the blue collar folks. when people are marginalized in any way, of course they will react. some of those reactions will be more virulent than others. and it becomes easy to prey on folks and stoke fear, no matter how irrational.

like... i have been fortunate enough to get the pfizer vaccine because i am a healthcare worker. so far, i am not a crocodile.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
rammagen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,031
And1: 785
Joined: Feb 17, 2003
Location: Atlanta GA

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1811 » by rammagen » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:06 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
rammagen wrote:
Dr Positivity wrote:
Pelosi has been playing games with the covid bill the entire year trying to put stuff into it the Republicans were never going to pass like removing voter ID and illegal immigration changes in addition to them being like 3 trillion bills where like 200 billion is stimulus. She didn't want a smaller covid bill like the one they just agreed to pass earlier because the goal was to hurt Trump to beat him in the election. She basically admitted this



"That was not a mistake, it was a decision"

Do you know what was in that bill exactly and what could have been bargained out? the point is McConnel sat on his fat ass and did nothing to help people that need it. Now more then ever. This crap with partisan politics has been around but has gotten nasty since the 90s this is the pay off. Why the f are you blaming just Nancy and not McConnel for not even voting or reading on it. There needs to be starting point in any negotiations Polosi gave him one and he did not act on it. Whose fault is that again?

Items could have been bargained out changed just to get Americans the help they needed when they needed it. now it is likely to late


Yeah, well it's Schumer's fault too. He's incapable to bringing the heat on McConnell. He's pathetically weak.

Of course, the Republicans are the schnooks once again but that does not absolve Pelosi and Schumer for doing a bad job here. They, just like the rest of us, know what the Republican play is in these situations. It's always the same. A smart and savvy politician would've stuck up their asses in a very public way and made them pay a political price on top of getting a much better deal.

MY point is you can not say anyone other then Mitch is doing a bad job. You can not negotiate with some one who wont talk. SO you can say so and so suck and are doing bad jobs but you cant do you job of trump puppets wont attempt to talk in good faith
Quote from ESPN’s Bill Simmons posted on Twitter “28 FT’s to 5. I don’t watch rigged NBA games, I’m switching to hockey”
rammagen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,031
And1: 785
Joined: Feb 17, 2003
Location: Atlanta GA

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1812 » by rammagen » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:13 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?


I think we proceed by winning the two Georgia seats and then Biden and a group of - hopefully - bipartisan group of Senators and Congresspersons steps up and goes bold with programs that will reach rural and blue collar working class folks.

I hope I’m addressing your issue.


oh, i have no issue. and our goals there are aligned. and i agree that all along everyone needed to be listening to and caring for the blue collar folks. when people are marginalized in any way, of course they will react. some of those reactions will be more virulent than others. and it becomes easy to prey on folks and stoke fear, no matter how irrational.

like... i have been fortunate enough to get the pfizer vaccine because i am a healthcare worker. so far, i am not a crocodile.

I a going to vote early today as a matter o fact
Quote from ESPN’s Bill Simmons posted on Twitter “28 FT’s to 5. I don’t watch rigged NBA games, I’m switching to hockey”
rammagen
Head Coach
Posts: 6,031
And1: 785
Joined: Feb 17, 2003
Location: Atlanta GA

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1813 » by rammagen » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:15 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:


I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:


right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?

That subset needs to form their own party if the reps had balls they would admit there is already a split. There is nothing wrong with being a rep but the new trumpers/ex tea partiers need to go in the white trash where they came from.
Quote from ESPN’s Bill Simmons posted on Twitter “28 FT’s to 5. I don’t watch rigged NBA games, I’m switching to hockey”
User avatar
DOT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,636
And1: 61,663
Joined: Nov 25, 2016
         

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1814 » by DOT » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:31 pm

rammagen wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:


right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?

That subset needs to form their own party if the reps had balls they would admit there is already a split. There is nothing wrong with being a rep but the new trumpers/ex tea partiers need to go in the white trash where they came from.
Why would they?

They have complete control of the Republican party right now

No matter what they do, almost all of the "moderate" Republicans will still follow them

At this point, we just have to accept that 75 million Americans identify themselves as Republicans and will vote as such no matter what even when an illiterate, racist man-baby is on the ticket

But don't tell the "moderates" I called him racist or you'll get flooded with articles from rich white guys saying he isn't, and dozens of snide comments about how the Dems founded the KKK and Republicans are the party of Lincoln, so they can't be racist, Dems are the real racists, pay no attention to the Confederate flags being flown at Republican events, those have nothing to do with racism, just heritage.

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
BaF Lakers:

Nikola Topic/Kasparas Jakucionis
VJ Edgecombe/Jrue Holiday
Shaedon Sharpe/Cedric Coward
Kyle Filipowski/Collin Murray-Boyles
Alex Sarr/Clint Capela

Bench: Malcolm Brogdon/Hansen Yang/Rocco Zikarsky/RJ Luis Jr.
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,767
And1: 12,716
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1815 » by Phish Tank » Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:42 pm

Repugs will go along with the $2,000, but then ask to limit the Fed, repeal Section 230, and all the other pork that was out of the agreed upon bill.
Image
User avatar
omerome
RealGM
Posts: 16,579
And1: 8,844
Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Location: Maryland (via Brooklyn)

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1816 » by omerome » Wed Dec 23, 2020 3:09 pm

Phish Tank wrote:Repugs will go along with the $2,000, but then ask to limit the Fed, repeal Section 230, and all the other pork that was out of the agreed upon bill.

You know it.

Mitch will likely require his corporate liability protections to be added with the $2000 check increase as well.

But what really pisses me off with Mitch is, he purposely screws over the American people when he himself is only alive today because of the contributions of the American people when he was dealing with his fight with Polio as a young boy. He's a selfish, self-centered scumbag who started off claiming to be a pro-choice, pro-civil right, and pro-labor representative, only to do a quick about-face when he was elected.



This video really explains everything.

And somehow, people like him keep getting elected. It really boggles my mind.
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,218
And1: 24,526
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1817 » by Pointgod » Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:16 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
I'm not a big fan of Schumer, but I feel Pelosi has been far more resilient in the face of sheer madness than she gets credit for.

She pounced immediately. Bluff called.

I don't see how Mitch can get away from this now. Besides, it is from the printing press. Fiscal prudence is not what the GOP practices so I think they'll agree


There are a lot of legitimate criticisms of Schumer and Pelosi but I feel like most people that criticize them have no clue how literally impossible it is to get anything done when one party only lives to obstruct. Remember Republicans have 2 out of 3 branches of Congress. Trump can’t do **** if McConnell won’t bring it to the floor and McConnell can’t pass anything through unless Trump signed it. The advantage is always 2-1 Republicans. However since Trump states he wanted 2000 dollar checks Pelosi smartly took advantage and set a plan in motion to bring it to the floor. That only happens because on that issue because of Trump, now McConnell is outnumbered 2-1. People legitimately want Schumer and Pelosi to magically force McConnell to do something with zero leverage.

This article should be require reading to understand the asymmetrical warfare between the two parties and why Democrats can’t just act like Republicans.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/05/01/why-democrats-govern-and-republicans-obstruct/


Trust me, I completely understand and appreciate Republican obstruction. But please explain to me - or refer to an authoritative article on - why (1) the democrats passed up the $1.8 billion offer, and (2) didn't negotiate harder with a desperate Mitch McConnell on the $900 billion package?


To answer your first question you can’t just react to things without understanding context. That 1.8 billion was 3 weeks before the election, but do you even know what was included in the bill?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/09/trump-raises-coronavirus-stimulus-offer-to-1point8-trillion-sources-say.html

To find a deal, Republicans and Democrats would have to quickly resolve several issues that have seemed intractable throughout months of fruitless talks. Pelosi has insisted on at least $436 billion in relief for cash-crunched state and local governments, while Trump has resisted sending them more than the $150 billion they received earlier this year.


Why would Democrats agree to that bill before the election when they were poised to take the Senate and Presidency? There’s no point giving Trump a political win unless you’re getting significant concessions that’s closer to the bill that was already passed through the House. And we all know that 1.8 trillion was never really serious because.....

Earlier Friday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said another stimulus package is "unlikely in the next three weeks." He has focused on confirming Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett before the election, and the Senate has set a confirmation hearing for Monday.


It was never going to get through the Senate. So that 1.8 trillion is a talking point that was never realistic. If you want to blame someone, blame Trump and McConnell for not getting the 1.8 billion bill through the Senate which would have helped Trump get re-election. Once again proving that both of them have terrible political instincts because passing a bill would have helped them retain power. And the last thing I’ll say is this:

The last time the GOP put a narrow bill (which included just $300 billion in new spending) on the floor of the Senate, Democrats used the filibuster to block it because they thought it was far too small.


Yeah so you should thank God Pelosi is still speaker because if McConnell and Trump were still in power this is what you’d be getting.

2. To answer your second point yes they should have put more pressure on McConnell, I personally think they should have pushed for 150 billion for states and local governments pointing out that Trump had previously supported that. But McConnell only showed his hand late last week and there’s only a short time to pass the government spending bill (again Congress’ fault) and we don’t know what else could have been negotiated without blowing up the whole deal. Remember Republicans don’t actually care if the government shuts down or if people die and go homeless. I’m sure they’d just as well throw a grenade and leave Biden to clean up the mess
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1818 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:17 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
I agree, it's easy to ignore them for the time being but over 70 million people still voted for him and we're still dealing with severely gerrymandered state voting districts which is why so many states are run by republicans. This is why I firmly believe that Democrats need to come out swinging for the fences from the opening pitch on January 20. Hopefully, we'll have the Senate with us this time. :pray:


right. i'm in no way suggeting cutting off 74 million americans with myriad political differences. that wasn't quite the point of this. it is the notion of accepting that there will be a subset that you can't reach. to what extent do you accept that and how do you proceed?


I think we proceed by winning the two Georgia seats and then Biden and a group of - hopefully - bipartisan group of Senators and Congresspersons steps up and goes bold with programs that will reach rural and blue collar working class folks.

I hope I’m addressing your issue.


I agree. I said this a little over a week ago and you were in a bad mood and snapped, but it was over the same point, so at least you do see that point that the Dems do need to reach out to the blue collar public and connect with them. Not only are their needs not being met by the GOP, their hearts and souls were abducted by the false patriotism of the GOP which has gone completely rogue and now is solely about party over country.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1819 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:20 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:like... i have been fortunate enough to get the pfizer vaccine because i am a healthcare worker. so far, i am not a crocodile.


Glad to hear you're well

Any symptoms like this so far?

Image
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,767
And1: 12,716
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: 2020 Presidential Election Thread presents: The Aftermath 

Post#1820 » by Phish Tank » Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:22 pm

omerome wrote:
Phish Tank wrote:Repugs will go along with the $2,000, but then ask to limit the Fed, repeal Section 230, and all the other pork that was out of the agreed upon bill.

You know it.

Mitch will likely require his corporate liability protections to be added with the $2000 check increase as well.

But what really pisses me off with Mitch is, he purposely screws over the American people when he himself is only alive today because of the contributions of the American people when he was dealing with his fight with Polio as a young boy. He's a selfish, self-centered scumbag who started off claiming to be a pro-choice, pro-civil right, and pro-labor representative, only to do a quick about-face when he was elected.



This video really explains everything.

And somehow, people like him keep getting elected. It really boggles my mind.


Maxine Waters was right in 2018 when she encouraged people to harass the Trump administration and their enablers. The national media and pro-civility Dems were mad, but that was the right approach.
Image

Return to New York Knicks