College/Draft thread. Knicks Currently have Picks 12 and 45

HarthorneWingo · Post #1801 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Sat May 7, 2022 7:11 pm

EMG518 wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
That is what Sacramento isn’t ping to say when they draft him.

I just looked up his height and was surprised to see that he's only 6' 2.5" IN SHOES with just a 6'4" wingspan.

Makes his 8.2 rebounds even more impressive.

Is that what we need, a rebounding undersized PG?

TheGreenArrow · Post #1802 » by **TheGreenArrow** » Sat May 7, 2022 7:31 pm

A potential rotation of……!!!!!!!!

Brunson/IQ
Rj/Grimes
Cam/Fournier
Obi/Sochan
Mitch/sims or Sim’s/Sochan

Would be soooo fun to watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EMG518 · Post #1803 » by **EMG518** » Sat May 7, 2022 9:24 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
EMG518 wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
I just looked up his height and was surprised to see that he's only 6' 2.5" IN SHOES with just a 6'4" wingspan.

Makes his 8.2 rebounds even more impressive.

Is that what we need, a rebounding undersized PG?

1. It was a joke.

2. We need literally everything and should be attached to nobody on this team.

3.He is a shooting guard.

4.We would be lucky to have him at 11.

bleedblue3303 · Post #1804 » by **bleedblue3303** » Sat May 7, 2022 11:43 pm

Who is Leonard Miller? The gambler in me wants this kid in the 2nd round.
6'10" with a 7'3" wingspan!

Watch on YouTube

El Poochio · Post #1805 » by **El Poochio** » Sun May 8, 2022 3:20 pm

bleedblue3303 wrote:Who is Leonard Miller? The gambler in me wants this kid in the 2nd round.
6'10" with a 7'3" wingspan!

Watch on YouTube

Was just checking him out yesterday but decided not to "folks" endorse

Dont think he will be there middle of the 2nd round though

Marty McFly · Post #1806 » by **Marty McFly** » Sun May 8, 2022 3:29 pm

TheGreenArrow wrote:A potential rotation of……!!!!!!!!

Brunson/IQ
Rj/Grimes
Cam/Fournier
Obi/Sochan
Mitch/sims or Sim’s/Sochan

Would be soooo fun to watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lmao.

Fat · Post #1807 » by **Fat** » Sun May 8, 2022 8:13 pm

We got zero chance to get sharpe

WargamesX · Post #1808 » by **WargamesX** » Sun May 8, 2022 8:29 pm

Angryfatboy wrote:We got zero chance to get sharpe

Unless we move up in the lottery :pray:

thebuzzardman · Post #1809 » by **thebuzzardman** » Sun May 8, 2022 9:33 pm

WargamesX wrote:
Angryfatboy wrote:We got zero chance to get sharpe

Unless we move up in the lottery

Knicks are moving back two spots

El Poochio · Post #1810 » by **El Poochio** » Mon May 9, 2022 12:31 am

Read on Twitter

thebuzzardman · Post #1811 » by **thebuzzardman** » Mon May 9, 2022 10:07 am

El Poochio wrote::rofl:

Read on Twitter

They can do some State Farm Insurance commercials together!

VirginiaKnickFan · Post #1812 » by **VirginiaKnickFan** » Mon May 9, 2022 12:18 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
Angryfatboy wrote:We got zero chance to get sharpe

Unless we move up in the lottery

Knicks are moving back two spots

Book it! I just can't wait for whom ever is representing the Knicks at the lottery to give their anguished look of defeat.

WargamesX · Post #1813 » by **WargamesX** » Mon May 9, 2022 1:57 pm

VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
WargamesX wrote:Unless we move up in the lottery

Knicks are moving back two spots

Book it! I just can't wait for whom ever is representing the Knicks at the lottery to give their anguished look of defeat.

If ever there was a year the knicks would move up, its this year that has no sure superstars :dontknow:

thebuzzardman · Post #1814 » by **thebuzzardman** » Mon May 9, 2022 2:03 pm

WargamesX wrote:
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicks are moving back two spots

Book it! I just can't wait for whom ever is representing the Knicks at the lottery to give their anguished look of defeat.

If ever there was a year the knicks would move up, its this year that has no sure superstars

I'm confident that even if the Knicks move up to 4, the players selected at 5-11 will be better.

WargamesX · Post #1815 » by **WargamesX** » Mon May 9, 2022 2:57 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
Book it! I just can't wait for whom ever is representing the Knicks at the lottery to give their anguished look of defeat.

If ever there was a year the knicks would move up, its this year that has no sure superstars

I'm confident that even if the Knicks move up to 4, the players selected at 5-11 will be better.

Sounds about right.... The knickiest of outcomes.

Richard4444 · Post #1816 » by **Richard4444** » Mon May 9, 2022 3:30 pm

Angryfatboy wrote:We got zero chance to get sharpe

That's a sharpe answer...

DrCoach · Post #1817 » by **DrCoach** » Mon May 9, 2022 9:56 pm

bleedblue3303 wrote:Who is Leonard Miller? The gambler in me wants this kid in the 2nd round.
6'10" with a 7'3" wingspan!

Watch on YouTube

Canadian kid

I think he goes 1st rd

HarthorneWingo · Post #1818 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Tue May 10, 2022 7:03 am

I'm loving Shaedon Sharp's entry into the draft. It's like we just got bumped up from 11 to 10. This guarantees us one of the top tier players. After #12, it appears the talent level drops down a bit. I'm hoping that Lord Benedict I (the first) drops down to us as a result. A couple of mocks predict exactly that.

HarthorneWingo · Post #1819 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Tue May 10, 2022 7:05 am

thebuzzardman wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
VirginiaKnickFan wrote:
Book it! I just can't wait for whom ever is representing the Knicks at the lottery to give their anguished look of defeat.

If ever there was a year the knicks would move up, its this year that has no sure superstars

I'm confident that even if the Knicks move up to 4, the players selected at 5-11 will be better.

We're actually fine right where we are. Rule No. 1: Do no harm. If we trade down two spots, then we remove ourselves from the first round's top tier of talent.

thebuzzardman · Post #1820 » by **thebuzzardman** » Tue May 10, 2022 10:04 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
If ever there was a year the knicks would move up, its this year that has no sure superstars

I'm confident that even if the Knicks move up to 4, the players selected at 5-11 will be better.

We're actually fine right where we are. Rule No. 1: Do no harm. If we trade down two spots, then we remove ourselves from the first round's top tier of talent.

The lottery will push down the Knicks one or two spots, as it always does. This is the way.