Build a Franchise Season 4 Offseason- Rule changes vote on page one

Post #1821 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 4:35 am

Why is it that pretty much any year if you get deep enough on the prospect list there's one or two guys with really funny names. They're never at the top of the draft. Always in questionable picking range.

bringbackhoffa · Post #1822 » by **bringbackhoffa** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:03 pm

Context · Post #1823 » by **Context** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:09 pm

bringbackhoffa wrote::thinking:

of?

bringbackhoffa · Post #1824 » by **bringbackhoffa** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:12 pm

Context wrote:
bringbackhoffa wrote::thinking:

of?

Post #1825 » by **King of Canada** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:17 pm

bringbackhoffa wrote:
Context wrote:
bringbackhoffa wrote::thinking:

of?

Spoiler:

Context · Post #1826 » by **Context** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:24 pm

King of Canada wrote:
bringbackhoffa wrote:
Context wrote: of?

Spoiler:

Spoiler:

bringbackhoffa · Post #1827 » by **bringbackhoffa** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:36 pm

King of Canada wrote:
bringbackhoffa wrote:
Context wrote: of?

Spoiler:

Post #1828 » by **Deeeez Knicks** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:41 pm

Capn'O wrote:Why is it that pretty much any year if you get deep enough on the prospect list there's one or two guys with really funny names. They're never at the top of the draft. Always in questionable picking range.

There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

Post #1829 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:42 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:Why is it that pretty much any year if you get deep enough on the prospect list there's one or two guys with really funny names. They're never at the top of the draft. Always in questionable picking range.

There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

bringbackhoffa · Post #1830 » by **bringbackhoffa** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:44 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:Why is it that pretty much any year if you get deep enough on the prospect list there's one or two guys with really funny names. They're never at the top of the draft. Always in questionable picking range.

There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

sounds like the knicks first round pick

Post #1831 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:45 pm

bringbackhoffa wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

sounds like the knicks first round pick

Context · Post #1832 » by **Context** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:46 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:Why is it that pretty much any year if you get deep enough on the prospect list there's one or two guys with really funny names. They're never at the top of the draft. Always in questionable picking range.

There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

- sorry but i would have changed my last name :lol:

Context · Post #1833 » by **Context** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:46 pm

Capn'O wrote:
bringbackhoffa wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

sounds like the knicks first round pick

Post #1834 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:48 pm

Context wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

- sorry but i would have changed my last name

I'm between him, Trevelin Queen, and Tres Tinkle.

Context · Post #1835 » by **Context** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:50 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Context wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

- sorry but i would have changed my last name

I'm between him, Trevelin Queen, and Tres Tinkle.

wait- what cap? :lol:

Post #1836 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:51 pm

Context wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Context wrote: - sorry but i would have changed my last name

I'm between him, Trevelin Queen, and Tres Tinkle.

wait- what cap?

THESE ARE REAL PROSPECTS!!!

http://www.tankathon.com/big_board

Keep scrollin'...

Post #1837 » by **Deeeez Knicks** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:54 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:Why is it that pretty much any year if you get deep enough on the prospect list there's one or two guys with really funny names. They're never at the top of the draft. Always in questionable picking range.

There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

Could end up being a steal just because he probably dropped down 30 spots just for the name. If his name was Jay Superstar he would be a top 5 lock.

Post #1838 » by **Capn'O** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:55 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
There are some guys you just know will be good or bad just based on names. Some teams would probably be better off drafting that way.

There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

Could end up being a steal just because he probably dropped down 30 spots just for the name. If his name was Jay Superstar he would be a top 5 lock.

Jay Topfivelock

The guy apparently has this amazing backstory and just CRUSHED all the JuCo scrubs and now he has to deal with this...

Context · Post #1839 » by **Context** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:58 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Context wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
I'm between him, Trevelin Queen, and Tres Tinkle.

wait- what cap?

THESE ARE REAL PROSPECTS!!!

http://www.tankathon.com/big_board

Keep scrollin'...

you cant make this **** up...i love tinkle-funny as **** :lol:

Post #1840 » by **Manhattan Project** » Fri Jul 17, 2020 4:00 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
There's actually a guy named "Scrubb" who is slated to be drafted in the high 50s or left undrafted. It's cruel, but also perhaps proof that we're living in a simulation.

I might pick him.

Could end up being a steal just because he probably dropped down 30 spots just for the name. If his name was Jay Superstar he would be a top 5 lock.

Jay Topfivelock

The guy apparently has this amazing backstory and just CRUSHED all the JuCo scrubs and now he has to deal with this...

Kofi Cockburn to the Clippers confirmed.