robillionaire wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Pointgod wrote:The Hill is far from Liberal. It’s a right wing news site but generally a good source of news, ignoring their opinion columns. Here’s a good graphic that shows media accuracy and political leanings.
As much as I appreciate the sentiment, that chart is deeply flawed
Reuters became suspect as soon as they partnered with Russia's news agency
The bottom left quadrant equates Mensch with Infowars. She's kind of wacky and has gotten some things wrong, but she's got alternative sources and some grey hat hackers who give her data I haven't seen anywhere else and was way ahead of the curve on multiple items like Assange, Prince, Russian connections the media has either ducked or taken years to report on
Putting the Intercept on the same level as the other publications in the complex analysis row belies the completely flawed construction of this graph.
All it does is allocate two criteria: Overall Quality and Partisanship
and the choice of overall quality is SUBJECTIVE and in some cases very questionable IMO
It would be more valuable as a FACT CHECKING graph, otherwise it is just another form of world view positioning (aka someone else's propaganda)
the whole thing is subjective because everybody thinks the news they watch which is usually the ones that align with their previously held beliefs are the true and correct ones
Yes, the rise of social media platforms weaponized the cultivation of reality distortion tunnels that effectively breed political cults impervious to facts
Which is why fact checking is critical, regardless of whether some cults resist any form of objective verification. Ultimately, it is the wishy washy, mealy minded middle of the population that allows fascism to take root and to them you do need some factual basis to point to and say here's the facts Jack, you go GOP now you support x, y and z, you go DEM you support x, y and z
The abundance of false equivalencies are a sign of failing democracies and they are produced by partisans across the political spectrum simply because bias always creeps in and intrudes on the facts
If I say Trump is a Nazi I'm fully prepared to provide specific analogues rooted in historical fact to show why fascism is here and why history is repeating itself
And the reason I let so much abuse bounce off me starting four years ago is because I KNEW well in advance what Trump was and that by dint of his actions during his tenure he would produce the fresh FACTS that match up with historical precedent
IOW, people poo poohing me for saying Trump was a Nazi four years ago was somewhat understandable so I took it in stride, but now that the facts are in there is no excuse for such ignorance. The corrollaries between Trump and Hitler (or any number of other dictators) are there in spades and it isn't really disputable any longer no matter how much some of his supporters will protest about the comparison
The facts are Trump is hell bent on destroying the Constitution (you don't get to cherry pick the right to bear arms for your militia supporters and claim you are pro-Constitution), stealing the election, empowering white supremacists and using whatever means he can get away with to crush his opponents. Those are facts and that is exactly what Hitler did in his rise to establishing the Third Reich. Trump is the Fourth Reich and it is why he is worshipped by Nazis worldwide. That's a fact Jack