xNewYorkMadex wrote:I'll say this, id rather have Luke Kennard than Malik Monk.
Luke can ball, hes comfortable putting the ball on the floor, good instincts and IQ. I like his versatility more than Monk. If Monk is struggling, he may not be able to help in other facets of the game. Luke can grab some boards, and might be better at finding the open man more often.
Wouldnt be mad if we draft him at all. Not sure if he has all-star potential, but he can get there if he keeps working on his handle and attacking/finishing around the rim. Maybe its a lazy comparison because they are both lefties, but he reminds me of Manu a bit.
His defense is trash though. Rather pick him in the teens with the 8th because of his defense. Hopefully we can acquire another 1st and select him.
No argument with your closing statement. I just don't really see him as an 8th pick. I mean yeah, it is great to have offense but at the NBA level he is going to either need a PG to create shots for him (which we don't have and haven't had) or he needs some athleticism, which he doesn't have.
That said, I trust in Phil (rather Gaines) and if he is picked, I would still look forward to what he becomes.
Monk is an elite scorer, he doesn't have the discipline of Kennard. That often happens when one has extreme athleticism like Monk. Monk might be able to defend quite well, though he has shorter arms and isn't exactly tall, but against 1's, if the coaches really get on him, he can do a good job (but no one can guard elite guards.)