Clyde_Style wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hyperbole aside, what is the most realistic player KD is after a year of rehabbing?
I'll throw out guesses
Tobias Harris
Faded Melo
Cadillac Ryan Anderson
End of the Road Pete Maravich
Post surgery Kobe
Fancy Mirotic
Old Dirk
Anyone?
Old Dirk with a dash of faded Melo most likely
I cannot for the life of me believe so many here are rationalizing away the truth that there is NO HISTORICAL BASIS for saying KD will be anything like the player he was before
It is completely irrational. Post-achilles players are never the same and it does not mean saying 70% of old KD is better than the rest of the league. That's nonsensical.
Once a player loses their mobility and ability to push off with a first step and has to depend mostly on craft and guile, then that is a lot less than 70% of who they were in a league full of super human specimens.
He is not just going to shoot over people. This is ridiculous. He is going to still have to rely on his handle which should largely be intact and make sudden cuts or pull-ups on his jumper, the very thing that will put more stress on the injured achilles.
You won't have him crashing the boards, you won't have him making big defensive plays at the rim and even his passing ability will be lessened because that still requires lower body push-off strength, otherwise you're trying to arm strength everything which leads to muscular imbalances and more injuries.
People need to stop kidding themselves because the history of these injuries does not have a 30 something player coming back to close to whom they were before.
And that my friends is why those who pound the table for KD are just gamblers, but not professional gamblers. The risk that you are tying up max money into at best a complementary player when they come back is an exceedingly high probability.
Probably what you said.
KD would have to be a pretty big outlier.
Hey, here's a couple of "non huge athlete guys"
Larry Bird was a legendary player who got reduced by a bad back injury. His stats, after the year he was limited to 6 games, looked good for a season, but he was hobbled. Then I'd say he got about 80% of his former output for 2 more years and just had to quit.
That "statistically roughly the same" season was Larry putting in a Herculean effort to try to be the same. The stats were there, but Bird wasn't "the same". But probably 90%. In the following two seasons he was just clearly hurting. And then he hung it up year 3, even though he averaged 20 ppg. It was too painful.
Don Mattingly in baseball had a bad back. He could still play. He went from HOF, Micky Mantle like numbers, to good field, decent average nearly no power.
These were back injuries - apples to oranges - but "skilled\smart" guys don't necessarily fare well after major injury either.