Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.
He makes 1.8 MM and had a 62% TS% last year
62 **** percent!
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.

Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.
mpharris36 wrote:K-DOT wrote:
I mean, that's better than 20 mil a year at least?
He's not really solving our problems, but he is technically an upgrade over Bullock
So it looks like we're trying to tread water until someone wants to come.
I mean 18 MM isn't crazy. But this out of the gate is confusing unless they already heard from all the big dogs they have no interest in pairing with people.
Like we need to lock up Fournier before we even have the meeting with Kawhi? What if Kawhi wants to try to bring someone else?

mpharris36 wrote:K-DOT wrote:
I mean, that's better than 20 mil a year at least?
He's not really solving our problems, but he is technically an upgrade over Bullock
So it looks like we're trying to tread water until someone wants to come.
I mean 18 MM isn't crazy. But this out of the gate is confusing unless they already heard from all the big dogs they have no interest in pairing with people.
Like we need to lock up Fournier before we even have the meeting with Kawhi? What if Kawhi wants to try to bring someone else?

mpharris36 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.
He makes 1.8 MM and had a 62% TS% last year
62 **** percent!
Doom Demise wrote:HEZI wrote:NotDikembeSayNo wrote:
Your emotions are getting the best of you chief.
If a guy who puts up 17 ppg on 41% from three and 46% from the field is our weakest link then we had a PHENOMENAL offseason.
He is awful and not worth our time or money. This guy is THJ but even worse defense
Just say you don't watch, him and THJ don't have similar games at all
moocow007 wrote:islanders11040 wrote:anyone willing to give Kyle Lowry a 1 yr 39 mil contract? may be what it takes to get him away from the heat.
Why though? Just to keep him away from the Heat?

mpharris36 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.
He makes 1.8 MM and had a 62% TS% last year
62 **** percent!
KnicksGod wrote:DaGawd wrote:Man **** this team I’m out…. Unless I get a wild notification lol
See you in 25 minutes.
mpharris36 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.
He makes 1.8 MM and had a 62% TS% last year
62 **** percent!
thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks wanted a player similar to Fournier last year, Gordon Haywood.
Knicks went from Alt-Right to Left Bank
Kampuchea wrote:I am good with Fournier at $20 or less. Schroeder i say no if he’s getting $25, $20 is acceptable for him. Would prefer cheaper guys like Reggie Jackson and Rose starting.

K-DOT wrote:mpharris36 wrote:K-DOT wrote:
I mean, that's better than 20 mil a year at least?
He's not really solving our problems, but he is technically an upgrade over Bullock
So it looks like we're trying to tread water until someone wants to come.
I mean 18 MM isn't crazy. But this out of the gate is confusing unless they already heard from all the big dogs they have no interest in pairing with people.
Like we need to lock up Fournier before we even have the meeting with Kawhi? What if Kawhi wants to try to bring someone else?
I assume most of the time, you have a good sense of how likely it is one of the big guys signs with you before free agency starts
It's either that, or this was the plan all along.
NotDikembeSayNo wrote:HEZI wrote:NotDikembeSayNo wrote:
Your emotions are getting the best of you chief.
If a guy who puts up 17 ppg on 41% from three and 46% from the field is our weakest link then we had a PHENOMENAL offseason.
He is awful and not worth our time or money. This guy is THJ but even worse defense
I'm not quite sure you know who Evan Fournier is.
mpharris36 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:F N 11 wrote:Now Brunson is trash? I have seen it all.
As a starting PG? He is.
He makes 1.8 MM and had a 62% TS% last year
62 **** percent!
HEZI wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks wanted a player similar to Fournier last year, Gordon Haywood.
Knicks went from Alt-Right to Left Bank
Hayward is way better than Fournier
