Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond

2010 · Post #1921 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:16 pm

reub wrote:He shot 35% from the field overall.

Spoiler:

2010 · Post #1922 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:18 pm

robillionaire wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
shtolky wrote:

Reddish looks like he should be a top pick yet his play during the season was consistently meh. Frustrating to watch really because he just looks like he should be a star. His productivity doesn't match how he looks on the court. RJ is the opposite. He doesn't look nearly as fluid or athletic, yet he was insanely productive compared to Reddish. I still think Reddish is going to be a good pro and one mediocre season at Duke probably doesn't mean a whole lot for his career.

If he had RJ’s mindset this past season, he’d probably be the #2 pick of the draft. He’s so talented

Well that’s the whole thing though. He doesn’t have RJ’s mindset and people are questioning his “motor” and RJ has dog so I’m taking the dog. We already have Knox as our low motor project but even he’s more aggressive at least

Yeah, I only would have seriously entertained taking the gamble on Cam at pick #5. But 4-Culver | 3-RJ | 2-Morant |1-Zion.

Fury · Post #1923 » by **Fury** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:24 pm

I don't know about Culver guys. And hell naw on Cam. If RJ is considered inefficient wth is Cam considered?

SelbyCobra · Post #1924 » by **SelbyCobra** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:27 pm

2010 wrote:
reub wrote:He shot 35% from the field overall.

Spoiler:

That's, like, historically bad. I want no part of Cam Reddish anywhere in the top-10, and absolutely not as the top pick of the Knicks 2019 draft, no matter where that first selection happens.

I get the appeal, but at some point the depth of his 2-point FG% is just a complete do-not-draft-with-a-valuable-pick to me.

F N 11 · Post #1925 » by **F N 11** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:33 pm

newyorker4ever wrote:
taj2133 wrote:

Read on Twitter

He has such a smooth and easy looking shooting stroke.

Damnnnnnnn

HEZI · Post #1926 » by **HEZI** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:35 pm

Cam is a good set shoot shooter but I need to see more stuff on the move to be impressed. I mean if he lands in ATL and plays with Young then I guess he will get plenty stand still opportunities but overall he still has ways to go to live up to the pre NCAA hype

Post #1927 » by **DOT** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:36 pm

2010 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:If he had RJ’s mindset this past season, he’d probably be the #2 pick of the draft. He’s so talented

Well that’s the whole thing though. He doesn’t have RJ’s mindset and people are questioning his “motor” and RJ has dog so I’m taking the dog. We already have Knox as our low motor project but even he’s more aggressive at least

Yeah, I only would have seriously entertained taking the gamble on Cam at pick #5. But 4-Culver | 3-RJ | 2-Morant |1-Zion.

Hmmmm

2010 · Post #1928 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:38 pm

K-DOT wrote:
2010 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Well that’s the whole thing though. He doesn’t have RJ’s mindset and people are questioning his “motor” and RJ has dog so I’m taking the dog. We already have Knox as our low motor project but even he’s more aggressive at least

Yeah, I only would have seriously entertained taking the gamble on Cam at pick #5. But 4-Culver | 3-RJ | 2-Morant |1-Zion.

Hmmmm

Spoiler:

F N 11 · Post #1929 » by **F N 11** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:39 pm

For those who think Rj sucks bc he has no wiggle :roll:

I bet you like Cam a ton.

Post #1930 » by **DOT** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:46 pm

2010 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:
2010 wrote:
Yeah, I only would have seriously entertained taking the gamble on Cam at pick #5. But 4-Culver | 3-RJ | 2-Morant |1-Zion.

Hmmmm

Spoiler:

Or maybe I go Bol Bol folks, Bol Bol

2010 · Post #1931 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:54 pm

K-DOT wrote:
2010 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:Hmmmm

Spoiler:

Or maybe I go Bol Bol folks, Bol Bol

#5: Garland or Cam
#17: Little or Keldon or Rui or Horton-Tucker or Porter Jr.

All guys who have high upside yet can possibly make an immediate impact.

awy · Post #1932 » by **awy** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:54 pm

GONYK wrote:
awy wrote:reddish's problem is more than just motor. he has far better motor on defense than rj.

it's the lack of athleticism and ability to make quick decisions on his drives.

RJ is weird defensively. Beyond being too upright, it's like he sticks with the play just fine, but gives up on the first obstacle.

Nothing actually removes him from staying on ball, he just gives up immediately.

yea i don't see rj having a good time getting around screens. a bit stiff and not really fighting over them.

NYKHardKnock · Post #1933 » by **NYKHardKnock** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:55 pm

Cam is that guy that looks good. JR Smith I’m sure would looked like a god in workouts.

Although I do think Cam will make for an excellent NBA career

2010 · Post #1934 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:55 pm

Would you guys take a flyer on Tacko Fall at #55?

awy · Post #1935 » by **awy** » Thu May 23, 2019 5:55 pm

F N 11 wrote:For those who think Rj sucks bc he has no wiggle I bet you like Cam a ton.

he's like a frank with more hype.

DowNY · Post #1936 » by **DowNY** » Thu May 23, 2019 6:00 pm

I don’t like Cam’s follow through

2010 · Post #1937 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 6:01 pm

awy wrote:
F N 11 wrote:For those who think Rj sucks bc he has no wiggle I bet you like Cam a ton.

he's like a frank with more hype.

Ok, now you buggin. RJ has pitbull in him offensively. Straight dawg.

Frank? This is Frank's response to our concerns about him offensively:

Spoiler:

2010 · Post #1938 » by **2010** » Thu May 23, 2019 6:02 pm

DowNY wrote:I don’t like Cam’s follow through

Keldon has an excellent follow-through.

taj2133 · Post #1939 » by **taj2133** » Thu May 23, 2019 6:07 pm

Read on Twitter

brandon clarke from the other day in charlotte a up and down workout showed good range

Read on Twitter

awy · Post #1940 » by **awy** » Thu May 23, 2019 6:07 pm

2010 wrote:
awy wrote:
F N 11 wrote:For those who think Rj sucks bc he has no wiggle I bet you like Cam a ton.

he's like a frank with more hype.

Ok, now you buggin. RJ has pitbull in him offensively. Straight dawg.

Frank? This is Frank's response to our concerns about him offensively:

Spoiler:

i mean cam. rj is too much pit bull offensively.

cam lacks aggression and lift, like frank.

What Should We Do With It?