Pointgod wrote:
NYP barking up the wrong tree if opinion thought Trump cares how he is remembered. It drives me insane how often people try to use human logic on him.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Pointgod wrote:
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Dr Positivity wrote:A question for people here... do you think it's possible to be an illiberal progressive?
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Dr Positivity wrote:A question for people here... do you think it's possible to be an illiberal progressive?
spree2kawhi wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:A question for people here... do you think it's possible to be an illiberal progressive?
If you go by the words it's very much possible. Liberalism isn't necessarily only a good thing. If you give freedom to corporations, you might pay a steep price regarding working conditions. Wherever you deregulate, someone will abuse freedoms. Elsewhere in the world, liberalism is by and large interpreted as mostly corporate thinking.
Btw, elsewhere in the world, where the reality is a high living and social security standard - think northern Europe (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany) - you find progressive politics, but dogmatic or simply put stupid US conservatives prefer calling that socialist.
Dr Positivity wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:A question for people here... do you think it's possible to be an illiberal progressive?
If you go by the words it's very much possible. Liberalism isn't necessarily only a good thing. If you give freedom to corporations, you might pay a steep price regarding working conditions. Wherever you deregulate, someone will abuse freedoms. Elsewhere in the world, liberalism is by and large interpreted as mostly corporate thinking.
Btw, elsewhere in the world, where the reality is a high living and social security standard - think northern Europe (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany) - you find progressive politics, but dogmatic or simply put stupid US conservatives prefer calling that socialist.
I would argue the cancel culture people are illiberal progressives. Censorship is illiberal but they also desire change.
I feel using the words liberals and conservatives as opposites is now outdated, it's really progressive vs conservative that are opposites. You could argue MAGA is a liberal conservative movement.
HarthorneWingo wrote:K-DOT wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:It's real Orwellian stuff when they do that, just talking crap completely devoid of context, historical context. I actually find it frightening, when it's not pissing me off.
It's all based on the assumption that "I'm a good person," which I think all or nearly all people have
Like, most everyone agrees racism is bad. Therefore, if you are a racist or support racists, you're a bad person. But since you know you're a good person, that means you can't be racist, or you can't support racism
It's the same way flat-earthers or any other cult-like belief works. Start with the conclusion (the earth is flat, I'm a good person therefore not racist), and then find evidence that supports that while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. Instead of the scientific method which would be asking, is the earth flat or am I actually being racist, and look at all the evidence before coming to a conclusion
There's a saying in Germany, that if you walk into a room with 11 people sitting at a table all conversing together, and one of them is a Nazi, there are 11 Nazis at the table. For those who don't understand the point, it's that when you allow those who are intolerant (Nazis, white supremacists, etc) into your group and allow them to participate, you're giving tacit approval of their ideas. Paradox of tolerance, if you want to read more
Not all racists are Republicans, I'm sure there are some racist Dems. In fact, I know that to be so. But only one party actively invites racists and neo-Nazis into their ranks with open arms while knowing exactly who they are, and burying your head in the sand and voting for that party regardless makes one complicit.
This is how racism rears its ugly head in an everyday context. Check out the fallout in this case. Good for her or was it over the top?
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/26/us/mimi-groves-jimmy-galligan-racial-slurs.html?action=click&module=Well&pgtype=Homepage§ion=US%20NewsA Racial Slur, a Viral Video, and a Reckoning
A white high school student withdrew from her chosen college after a three-second video caused an uproar online. The classmate who shared it publicly has no regrets.
By Dan Levin
Dec. 26, 2020
LEESBURG, Va. — Jimmy Galligan was in history class last school year when his phone buzzed with a message. Once he clicked on it, he found a three-second video of a white classmate looking into the camera and uttering an anti-Black racial slur.
The slur, he said, was regularly hurled in classrooms and hallways throughout his years in the Loudoun County school district. He had brought the issue up to teachers and administrators but, much to his anger and frustration, his complaints had gone nowhere.
So he held on to the video, which was sent to him by a friend, and made a decision that would ricochet across Leesburg, Va., a town named for an ancestor of the Confederate general Robert E. Lee and whose school system had fought an order to desegregate for more than a decade after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling.
-more-
fleet wrote:Pointgod wrote:
NYP barking up the wrong tree if opinion thought Trump cares how he is remembered. It drives me insane how often people try to use human logic on him.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Pointgod wrote:
Louie Gohmert the dumbest member of Congress had signed onto this lawsuit. It’s destined to fail.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Dr Positivity wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:Dr Positivity wrote:A question for people here... do you think it's possible to be an illiberal progressive?
If you go by the words it's very much possible. Liberalism isn't necessarily only a good thing. If you give freedom to corporations, you might pay a steep price regarding working conditions. Wherever you deregulate, someone will abuse freedoms. Elsewhere in the world, liberalism is by and large interpreted as mostly corporate thinking.
Btw, elsewhere in the world, where the reality is a high living and social security standard - think northern Europe (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany) - you find progressive politics, but dogmatic or simply put stupid US conservatives prefer calling that socialist.
I would argue the cancel culture people are illiberal progressives. Censorship is illiberal but they also desire change.
I feel using the words liberals and conservatives as opposites is now outdated, it's really progressive vs conservative that are opposites. You could argue MAGA is a liberal conservative movement.
dakomish23 wrote:They call Dems communists but quote Stalin?
FYI
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
dakomish23 wrote:They call Dems communists but quote Stalin?
FYI
Pointgod wrote:dakomish23 wrote:They call Dems communists but quote Stalin?
FYI
I wonder if polling aggregators like 538 will ever include Rasmussen and Trafalgar Group in their polls moving forward. It’s hard to position yourself as a serious operation when you’ve shown a disgusting amount of bias (Trafalger) and you’re supporting the actual subversion of Democracy (Rasmussen)
Clyde_Style wrote:Pointgod wrote:dakomish23 wrote:They call Dems communists but quote Stalin?
FYI
I wonder if polling aggregators like 538 will ever include Rasmussen and Trafalgar Group in their polls moving forward. It’s hard to position yourself as a serious operation when you’ve shown a disgusting amount of bias (Trafalger) and you’re supporting the actual subversion of Democracy (Rasmussen)
Good question. The whole giving equal time to fascist aholes rule did not work out so well for publications like the NY Times and it should have no role in polling reports like 538.
Rassmussen was not credible before, but quoting Stalin and partaking in sedition does more than discredit them. It's disgusting.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor