Stannis wrote:DaGawd wrote:Fury wrote:
I don't understand the fleecing talk. We got the best player in the deal. Both the best player and the second best player in the deal are due for an extension. OG also fits seamlessly into the starting lineup.
this. we also don’t get og in a straight 1 for 1 of rj without giving up multiple first round picks also
OG is a good fit for sure. But he's still
just a role player.
But is him resigning with the Knicks set in stone? What will his contract be worth? I'm reading that he wants 40 a year.
Respectfully this gets thrown around way too much and just feels lazy. Grimes, DDV, J Hart at least to me are role players. When we played Miami last playoff Caleb Martin was hurting us as a role player. When we just lost to Indiana Nembhard hurt us as a role player. The list is essentially endless as you can identify those kinds of guys on every team in the league.
People get way too caught up in “can player X create off the dribble” and can they easily “get you a bucket when it matters.” If they don’t check those boxes they automatically get filed under “must be a role player.”
Feels like a slight to OG for this reason: How many guys can you find that will pour in 16PPG and 6 Rebounds, while getting 3+ deflections, over 1.5 steals, legitimately guard 1-5 (he spent 25% on PF/SF last year, 20% on PG/SG and 10% on C). Not to mention have a 59% TS the last 3 seasons, hit threes at a 39% clip and blend into an offense by cutting back door as to not take away from our primary ball handlers.
OG is probably one of the better 2 way players the league has to offer he just impacts the game without eye popping, popcorn style creativity.