ImageImageImageImageImage

Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

What Should We Do With It?

RJ
145
74%
Cam
3
2%
Garland
9
5%
Culver
3
2%
Other
1
1%
Trade Down
8
4%
Trade Out Of The Draft
20
10%
Give Up and Follow The Warriors
1
1%
STFU Capn'O
6
3%
 
Total votes: 196

User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,824
And1: 109,436
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1941 » by Capn'O » Thu May 23, 2019 6:13 pm

K-DOT wrote:
2010 wrote:
K-DOT wrote:Hmmmm


Spoiler:
Image

Or maybe I go Bol Bol folks, Bol Bol


I know you're being facetious at 5 but if you're in the 10-12 range you basically have to take him if he's there.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,376
And1: 42,500
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1942 » by 2010 » Thu May 23, 2019 6:16 pm

awy wrote:
2010 wrote:
awy wrote:he's like a frank with more hype. :D


Ok, now you buggin. RJ has pitbull in him offensively. Straight dawg.

Frank? This is Frank's response to our concerns about him offensively:

Spoiler:
Image

i mean cam. rj is too much pit bull offensively.

cam lacks aggression and lift, like frank.


Oh ok, I agree with you on that take.
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Wallace
2: White | Smart | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1943 » by Clyde_Style » Thu May 23, 2019 6:16 pm

I want a Tacko Fall Bol Bol ball team
taj2133
General Manager
Posts: 7,504
And1: 2,972
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1944 » by taj2133 » Thu May 23, 2019 6:17 pm

look like kemba staying in charlotte if he gets super max he made all nba third team today
Read on Twitter
BowlRips
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,688
And1: 2,934
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
     

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1945 » by BowlRips » Thu May 23, 2019 6:22 pm

taj2133 wrote:look like kemba staying in charlotte if he gets super max he made all nba third team today
Read on Twitter


Its actually good.
MJ not dumb enough to hand Kemba Walker a $211 million contract, especially after seeing what happened with the Wizards and Wall.
His unwillingness to offer the contract going to create animosity between them and hell look to leave.

Wish Beal got All-NBA, then he wouldv'e qualified for a $191 million contract and the Wizards were not about to have a two $200mil contracts on the books. Would've forced a trade
User avatar
newyorker4ever
RealGM
Posts: 10,412
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
     

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1946 » by newyorker4ever » Thu May 23, 2019 6:23 pm

taj2133 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Would love to be able to get this kid but he's gonna go around the middle of the draft.
taj2133
General Manager
Posts: 7,504
And1: 2,972
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1947 » by taj2133 » Thu May 23, 2019 6:26 pm

newyorker4ever wrote:
taj2133 wrote:
Read on Twitter



Would love to be able to get this kid but he's gonna go around the middle of the draft.

I think the celtics are going to pick him with 14 or the 20 pick.
taj2133
General Manager
Posts: 7,504
And1: 2,972
Joined: Jun 14, 2009

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1948 » by taj2133 » Thu May 23, 2019 6:28 pm

BowlRips wrote:
taj2133 wrote:look like kemba staying in charlotte if he gets super max he made all nba third team today
Read on Twitter


Its actually good.
MJ not dumb enough to hand Kemba Walker a $211 million contract, especially after seeing what happened with the Wizards and Wall.
His unwillingness to offer the contract going to create animosity between them and hell look to leave.

Wish Beal got All-NBA, then he wouldv'e qualified for a $191 million contract and the Wizards were not about to have a two $200mil contracts on the books. Would've forced a trade

Never say never with mj he is hel bent on signing kemba i would not rule it out completely and beal didn't make all nba team today.
User avatar
newyorker4ever
RealGM
Posts: 10,412
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
     

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1949 » by newyorker4ever » Thu May 23, 2019 6:30 pm

2010 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:If he had RJ’s mindset this past season, he’d probably be the #2 pick of the draft. He’s so talented


Well that’s the whole thing though. He doesn’t have RJ’s mindset and people are questioning his “motor” and RJ has dog so I’m taking the dog. We already have Knox as our low motor project but even he’s more aggressive at least


Yeah, I only would have seriously entertained taking the gamble on Cam at pick #5. But 4-Culver | 3-RJ | 2-Morant |1-Zion.



I have D.Hunter and D.Garland ahead of Culver and Cam. I do like both of them, Culver for his play on both sides of the ball and Cam because that intrigue is there that he can be the guy everyone thought he would be in college but it seems like not many on here are all that high on D.Hunter because i don't see him get talked about much on here but i'm a big fan and i think Garland is gonna be real good and would love to have his shooting from the PG spot.
User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,376
And1: 42,500
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1950 » by 2010 » Thu May 23, 2019 6:42 pm

newyorker4ever wrote:
2010 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Well that’s the whole thing though. He doesn’t have RJ’s mindset and people are questioning his “motor” and RJ has dog so I’m taking the dog. We already have Knox as our low motor project but even he’s more aggressive at least


Yeah, I only would have seriously entertained taking the gamble on Cam at pick #5. But 4-Culver | 3-RJ | 2-Morant |1-Zion.



I have D.Hunter and D.Garland ahead of Culver and Cam. I do like both of them, Culver for his play on both sides of the ball and Cam because that intrigue is there that he can be the guy everyone thought he would be in college but it seems like not many on here are all that high on D.Hunter because i don't see him get talked about much on here but i'm a big fan and i think Garland is gonna be real good and would love to have his shooting from the PG spot.


I like Hunter. But the concern is if he has a high floor but low ceiling.
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Wallace
2: White | Smart | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 31,972
And1: 20,937
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1951 » by stuporman » Thu May 23, 2019 7:55 pm

Wiggle? Isn't this fan base the ones who hate on any player who ISOs? Well, isn't wiggle a term used to describe a facet of the face up game in reference to isolation play? So, why is it a desirable trait now?

In my opinion wiggle is great and all that but it's not the most important trait of a dribble driver. They have to have a great handle for their wiggle to mean anything, if the ball isn't under control it's not going to effectively be put to use no matter how much wiggle one has.

There's also seeing the team defense concept being played and using the dribble to manipulate the defender out of position. Then being able to exploit that positioning either through getting to the basket, finding an open player to pass to or shooting the ball is the point of it.

Taking great angles, body control, using space and screens/picks, change of direction, footwork, finishing the play are all part of how a player uses the dribble to create plays. So, 'wiggle' isn't the be all of it, it may be the flashiest aspect but without the rest it's really nothing.

There have been plenty of players who don't have great wiggle but have the rest of the skills so thrive and there are plenty of guys who have all sorts of wiggle yet don't succeed in the league.

:lol:
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1952 » by Clyde_Style » Thu May 23, 2019 8:25 pm

stuporman wrote:Wiggle? Isn't this fan base the ones who hate on any player who ISOs? Well, isn't wiggle a term used to describe a facet of the face up game in reference to isolation play? So, why is it a desirable trait now?

In my opinion wiggle is great and all that but it's not the most important trait of a dribble driver. They have to have a great handle for their wiggle to mean anything, if the ball isn't under control it's not going to effectively be put to use no matter how much wiggle one has.

There's also seeing the team defense concept being played and using the dribble to manipulate the defender out of position. Then being able to exploit that positioning either through getting to the basket, finding an open player to pass to or shooting the ball is the point of it.

Taking great angles, body control, using space and screens/picks, change of direction, footwork, finishing the play are all part of how a player uses the dribble to create plays. So, 'wiggle' isn't the be all of it, it may be the flashiest aspect but without the rest it's really nothing.

There have been plenty of players who don't have great wiggle but have the rest of the skills so thrive and there are plenty of guys who have all sorts of wiggle yet don't succeed in the league.

:lol:


I always knew you had it in you to write an essay on Wiggle.

Congrats
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,870
And1: 45,478
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1953 » by GONYK » Thu May 23, 2019 8:30 pm

stuporman wrote:Wiggle? Isn't this fan base the ones who hate on any player who ISOs? Well, isn't wiggle a term used to describe a facet of the face up game in reference to isolation play? So, why is it a desirable trait now?

In my opinion wiggle is great and all that but it's not the most important trait of a dribble driver. They have to have a great handle for their wiggle to mean anything, if the ball isn't under control it's not going to effectively be put to use no matter how much wiggle one has.

There's also seeing the team defense concept being played and using the dribble to manipulate the defender out of position. Then being able to exploit that positioning either through getting to the basket, finding an open player to pass to or shooting the ball is the point of it.

Taking great angles, body control, using space and screens/picks, change of direction, footwork, finishing the play are all part of how a player uses the dribble to create plays. So, 'wiggle' isn't the be all of it, it may be the flashiest aspect but without the rest it's really nothing.

There have been plenty of players who don't have great wiggle but have the rest of the skills so thrive and there are plenty of guys who have all sorts of wiggle yet don't succeed in the league.

:lol:


Well, it speaks to a couple of things. It is a combo of fluidity of movement, body control, point to point burst, as well as the handle. So it's not something that relates to ISO's as much as it is something that is looked at for people who are deemed ballhandlers/playmakers.

In RJ's case, his athleticism is very good, but it's not fluid. His movements are sorta choppy bursts, and he plays upright, which makes his bursts more straight line than edging around corners.

On top of that, his handle is pretty loose and his right hand is borderline atrocious for a top player in the draft, so he's not manipulating defenders through ballhandling skill. He spent most of his time going through people rather than around them.

Some of this is correctable, some will probably persist. It's not a fatal flaw, but it is worth noting.
User avatar
2010
RealGM
Posts: 37,376
And1: 42,500
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
       

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1954 » by 2010 » Thu May 23, 2019 8:43 pm

I get where stuperman is going with this though. Most guys with wiggle are ball-dominant guys who iso and need to be in rhythm to be effective. A straight-line driver like RJ may be ball-dominant but he does make quick decisions with the ball. His movements have effort, decisiveness, and conviction. Sure he has looked off guys before. But he is not the type to stand at the top of the key dancing with the dribble, lulling guys to sleep like Melo, CP3, Harden, Crawford, Trier, to the detriment of ball movement. I get it. It's a nice take. And it is a stance that can make RJ's perceived weakness almost become a positive in the concept of team play and quick-decisions.

Which takes me to this comp. RJ is a straight-line driver, an attacker, who excels in the open floor. Dude has a motor and some dog in him. He has some concerns about advanced ballhandling and legit long range 3pt consistency. Sounds to me like he is a 2-inch bigger Latrell Sprewell. Another guy who was a straight-line driver, an attacker, excelled in the open floor, who had motor offensively and some dog in him. Another guy who was criticized for not having advanced ballhandling and took a while to develop a consistent 3pt shot. He ended up being a great pull-up midrange shooter though. I see no reason RJ can't become a bigger, left-handed Spree.
Image

2024 Bubble Champs

1: Thompson | Nembhard | Wallace
2: White | Smart | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
Huey Freeman
General Manager
Posts: 7,571
And1: 879
Joined: Nov 13, 2003
Location: Everywhere

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1955 » by Huey Freeman » Thu May 23, 2019 8:45 pm

Does Kawhi have “wiggle”?
Revolution starts in the mind...
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,870
And1: 45,478
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1956 » by GONYK » Thu May 23, 2019 8:48 pm

2010 wrote:I get where stuperman is going with this though. Most guys with wiggle are ball-dominant guys who iso and need to be in rhythm to be effective. A straight-line driver like RJ may be ball-dominant but he does make quick decisions with the ball. His movements have effort, decisiveness, and conviction. Sure he has looked off guys before. But he is not the type to stand at the top of the key dancing with the dribble, lulling guys to sleep like Melo, CP3, Harden, Crawford, to the detriment of ball movement. I get it. It's a nice take. And it is a stance that can make RJ's perceived weakness almost become a positive in the concept of team play and quick-decisions.

Which takes me to this comp. RJ is a straight-line driver, an attacker, who excels in the open floor. Dude has a motor and some dog in him. He has some concerns about advanced ballhandling and legit long range 3pt consistency. Sounds to me like he is a 2-inch bigger Latrell Sprewell. Another guy who was a straight-line driver, an attacker, excelled in the open floor, who had motor offensively and some dog in him. Another guy who was criticized for not having advanced ballhandling and took a while to develop a consistent 3pt shot. He ended up being a great pull-up midrange shooter though. I see no reason RJ can't become a bigger, left-handed Spree.


Offensively speaking, that can be a development path for RJ.

I don't think the lack of wiggle is all that detrimental to RJ, but I do think it takes the Harden type comps that have been floating around off the table.
nykinoz
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,959
And1: 1,203
Joined: Jun 19, 2001
Location: Australia
     

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1957 » by nykinoz » Thu May 23, 2019 8:54 pm

In your eyes, whats on the Lakers to pair with #4 for our #3 that would satisfy you?
Knicks fan since 1991
User avatar
Tron Carter
RealGM
Posts: 17,534
And1: 20,138
Joined: Jul 20, 2012
Location: NBA Purgatory

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1958 » by Tron Carter » Thu May 23, 2019 9:06 pm

BowlRips wrote:
taj2133 wrote:look like kemba staying in charlotte if he gets super max he made all nba third team today
Read on Twitter


Its actually good.
MJ not dumb enough to hand Kemba Walker a $211 million contract, especially after seeing what happened with the Wizards and Wall.
His unwillingness to offer the contract going to create animosity between them and hell look to leave.

Wish Beal got All-NBA, then he wouldv'e qualified for a $191 million contract and the Wizards were not about to have a two $200mil contracts on the books. Would've forced a trade


you’re giving mj waaay too much credit.
Image
R.I.P Black Mamba
User avatar
stuporman
RealGM
Posts: 31,972
And1: 20,937
Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Location: optimistic skeptical realist

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1959 » by stuporman » Thu May 23, 2019 9:08 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
stuporman wrote:Wiggle? Isn't this fan base the ones who hate on any player who ISOs? Well, isn't wiggle a term used to describe a facet of the face up game in reference to isolation play? So, why is it a desirable trait now?

In my opinion wiggle is great and all that but it's not the most important trait of a dribble driver. They have to have a great handle for their wiggle to mean anything, if the ball isn't under control it's not going to effectively be put to use no matter how much wiggle one has.

There's also seeing the team defense concept being played and using the dribble to manipulate the defender out of position. Then being able to exploit that positioning either through getting to the basket, finding an open player to pass to or shooting the ball is the point of it.

Taking great angles, body control, using space and screens/picks, change of direction, footwork, finishing the play are all part of how a player uses the dribble to create plays. So, 'wiggle' isn't the be all of it, it may be the flashiest aspect but without the rest it's really nothing.

There have been plenty of players who don't have great wiggle but have the rest of the skills so thrive and there are plenty of guys who have all sorts of wiggle yet don't succeed in the league.

:lol:


I always knew you had it in you to write an essay on Wiggle.

Congrats


Well, I got a couple more of them about wiggle but not on basketball..... :P
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
Image?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Draft Thread: Knicks got #3 - Combine and Beyond 

Post#1960 » by Clyde_Style » Thu May 23, 2019 9:37 pm

stuporman wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
stuporman wrote:Wiggle? Isn't this fan base the ones who hate on any player who ISOs? Well, isn't wiggle a term used to describe a facet of the face up game in reference to isolation play? So, why is it a desirable trait now?

In my opinion wiggle is great and all that but it's not the most important trait of a dribble driver. They have to have a great handle for their wiggle to mean anything, if the ball isn't under control it's not going to effectively be put to use no matter how much wiggle one has.

There's also seeing the team defense concept being played and using the dribble to manipulate the defender out of position. Then being able to exploit that positioning either through getting to the basket, finding an open player to pass to or shooting the ball is the point of it.

Taking great angles, body control, using space and screens/picks, change of direction, footwork, finishing the play are all part of how a player uses the dribble to create plays. So, 'wiggle' isn't the be all of it, it may be the flashiest aspect but without the rest it's really nothing.

There have been plenty of players who don't have great wiggle but have the rest of the skills so thrive and there are plenty of guys who have all sorts of wiggle yet don't succeed in the league.

:lol:


I always knew you had it in you to write an essay on Wiggle.

Congrats


Well, I got a couple more of them about wiggle but not on basketball..... :P


In that case:

Get a wiggle room!

Return to New York Knicks