Marcus wrote:Wiretap says you guys are considering WCS at #4......how yall feel about that?
you spend so much time here, i thought you were "one of us."
what team do you root for?
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Marcus wrote:Wiretap says you guys are considering WCS at #4......how yall feel about that?

Marcus wrote:Workforce250 wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:
I don't hate WCS as a prospect but, I'm not a fan of losing 65 games for him... He's not a superstar, at least in my view, and it would piss me off beyond no end if we pick him at 4, especially, since we can most likely trade down to pick him and get an extra asset in the process if he is who we really want.
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.
so say Mudiay, Russell, Winslow are all available and you guys draft WCS that's ok with you?
Workforce250 wrote:The team in a crux is Orlando who want WCS. Knowing we can grab him may lead them to deal one spot with us so they can get their guy and we still get Mudiay. The last thing the Magic wants is another guard.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles
Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
EMG518 wrote:Workforce250 wrote:The team in a crux is Orlando who want WCS. Knowing we can grab him may lead them to deal one spot with us so they can get their guy and we still get Mudiay. The last thing the Magic wants is another guard.
They would want this guard although I dont think he is there at 4.
Marcus wrote:Workforce250 wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:
I don't hate WCS as a prospect but, I'm not a fan of losing 65 games for him... He's not a superstar, at least in my view, and it would piss me off beyond no end if we pick him at 4, especially, since we can most likely trade down to pick him and get an extra asset in the process if he is who we really want.
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.
so say Mudiay, Russell, Winslow are all available and you guys draft WCS that's ok with you?
Workforce250 wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Marcus wrote:Wiretap says you guys are considering WCS at #4......how yall feel about that?
I don't hate WCS as a prospect but, I'm not a fan of losing 65 games for him... He's not a superstar, at least in my view, and it would piss me off beyond no end if we pick him at 4, especially, since we can most likely trade down to pick him and get an extra asset in the process if he is who we really want.
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.

Workforce250 wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Marcus wrote:Wiretap says you guys are considering WCS at #4......how yall feel about that?
I don't hate WCS as a prospect but, I'm not a fan of losing 65 games for him... He's not a superstar, at least in my view, and it would piss me off beyond no end if we pick him at 4, especially, since we can most likely trade down to pick him and get an extra asset in the process if he is who we really want.
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.
92Knicksfan93 wrote:Workforce250 wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:
I don't hate WCS as a prospect but, I'm not a fan of losing 65 games for him... He's not a superstar, at least in my view, and it would piss me off beyond no end if we pick him at 4, especially, since we can most likely trade down to pick him and get an extra asset in the process if he is who we really want.
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.
He's definitely worth consideration. Would you rather pay DeAndre Jordan close to or on a max deal or would rather have WCS who can provide rebounding, shot blocking, and ability to defend several positions on a rookie deal?
greenhughes wrote:92Knicksfan93 wrote:Workforce250 wrote:
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.
He's definitely worth consideration. Would you rather pay DeAndre Jordan close to or on a max deal or would rather have WCS who can provide rebounding, shot blocking, and ability to defend several positions on a rookie deal?
Exactly.

IAmTheBest wrote:do you guys not realize that wcs is already 22 years old and got lit up by kaminsky?
wcs also has sickle cell trait, meaning he cant play in denver, utah, etc

greenhughes wrote:92Knicksfan93 wrote:Workforce250 wrote:
Would a future contender for DPOY not be worthy of a #4 pick? That's my question.
He's definitely worth consideration. Would you rather pay DeAndre Jordan close to or on a max deal or would rather have WCS who can provide rebounding, shot blocking, and ability to defend several positions on a rookie deal?
Exactly.

GONYK wrote:
He's worth considering...then passing over for a better player

