ImageImageImageImageImage

[Camelo Thread Part 19] - Nyets won't be used pg 52

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,592
And1: 137,429
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Bluff Me? Bluff You! 

Post#21 » by god shammgod » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:32 am

johnnywishbone wrote:
NYsportsfan6230 wrote:Woooo #19.

I still say 23 will be the one.


If it's thread 23 and he goes to the Bulls I'm going to give up on God.


like it's my fault, some people
User avatar
NYsportsfan6230
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 24, 2011

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Bluff Me? Bluff You! 

Post#22 » by NYsportsfan6230 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:32 am

AggO wrote:
johnnywishbone wrote:
NYsportsfan6230 wrote:Woooo #19.

I still say 23 will be the one.


If it's thread 23 and he goes to the Bulls I'm going to give up on God.


i'd seriously consider suicide if this was the case


I wouldn't, I'd have too much fun watching Melo suffer in NJ.
User avatar
BBALLER4FR
RealGM
Posts: 19,539
And1: 8,480
Joined: May 05, 2004
Location: Not sure anymore.
   

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#23 » by BBALLER4FR » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:35 am

Starksfor3 wrote:Did anyone from the Nets organization confirm them re-entering the talks? This could be another BS leak by the Nuggets.


I thought earlier I read Nets management say the only move they'd make would involve Murphy. What changed that?
Karl Anthony-Towms

There goes my hero. He's ordinary.
AllanHoustonFan
RealGM
Posts: 28,947
And1: 6,966
Joined: Jun 27, 2010
Location: NBA Lottery Dais
     

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#24 » by AllanHoustonFan » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:35 am

BBALLER4FR wrote:
Starksfor3 wrote:Did anyone from the Nets organization confirm them re-entering the talks? This could be another BS leak by the Nuggets.


I thought earlier I read Nets management say the only move they'd make would involve Murphy. What changed that?


It's called trying to get leverage
#MKGA
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,248
And1: 25,705
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#25 » by moocow007 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:36 am

Starksfor3 wrote:Did anyone from the Nets organization confirm them re-entering the talks? This could be another BS leak by the Nuggets.


I doubt that even if it was just another amateur hour attempt by Ujiri that the Nets would come out and discredit it. I do believe that Prokhorov is smart enough to realize that Melo doesn't want his team but he's also smart enough to realize that the next best thing is for his biggest rival to lose as much as possible in a Melo deal. So I'm sure he's fine with playing along.

EDIT: The Nets next game after tonight isn't until AFTER the trade deadline so playing along isn't going to throw his team for a loop (why he "officially" pulled out last time).
User avatar
Knick Swisher
Head Coach
Posts: 7,151
And1: 334
Joined: Jun 08, 2009
Location: Brooklyn
     

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#26 » by Knick Swisher » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:36 am

Let's see...we're on thread 19 with 8 days to go. We went through a whole thread in roughly a day...factor in the sudden wave of BS rumors.. I say we end this on 26.
User avatar
Li'l Penny
Veteran
Posts: 2,730
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 11, 2004

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#27 » by Li'l Penny » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:37 am

Image
User avatar
Starksfor3
RealGM
Posts: 14,170
And1: 907
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Perpetual Knick hell
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#28 » by Starksfor3 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:37 am

moocow007 wrote:
Starksfor3 wrote:Did anyone from the Nets organization confirm them re-entering the talks? This could be another BS leak by the Nuggets.


I doubt that even if it was just another amateur hour attempt by Ujiri that the Nets would come out and discredit it. I do believe that Prokhorov is smart enough to realize that Melo doesn't want his team but he's also smart enough to realize that the next best thing is for his biggest rival to lose as much as possible in a Melo deal. So I'm sure he's fine with playing along.



Good point.
User avatar
Knick Swisher
Head Coach
Posts: 7,151
And1: 334
Joined: Jun 08, 2009
Location: Brooklyn
     

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#29 » by Knick Swisher » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:38 am

louieOrr wrote:Melo is playing like he wants to prove to the Knicks he is worth whatever Denver asks

He could crack 3 bills, I still ain't giving more than is necessary.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,995
And1: 45,764
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#30 » by GONYK » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:39 am

thatdude wrote:
louieOrr wrote:Melo is playing like he wants to prove to the Knicks he is worth whatever Denver asks

He could crack 3 bills, I still ain't giving more than is necessary.

FACT
User avatar
louieOrr
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 474
Joined: Jun 20, 2010
         

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#31 » by louieOrr » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:39 am

thatdude wrote:
louieOrr wrote:Melo is playing like he wants to prove to the Knicks he is worth whatever Denver asks

He could crack 3 bills, I still ain't giving more than is necessary.


Dam straight!
Image
BowlRips
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,691
And1: 2,934
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
     

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#32 » by BowlRips » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:39 am

Were on a thread every 36 hour pace. So I expect a deal by Wednesday. Figure were by thread 23 for the deal.
User avatar
NYsportsfan6230
Sophomore
Posts: 190
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 24, 2011

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#33 » by NYsportsfan6230 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:39 am

The more I think about it, I actually kinda agree with BSPN for a change.

I really don't think that Amare and Melo's game can mesh well. I wonder if STAT would be the type to complain about not getting enough touches. I mean Melo has taken like 35 shots this game, that's a crazy amount.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#34 » by Fury » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:40 am

NYsportsfan6230 wrote:The more I think about it, I actually kinda agree with BSPN for a change.

I really don't think that Amare and Melo's game can mesh well. I wonder if STAT would be the type to complain about not getting enough touches. I mean Melo has taken like 35 shots this game, that's a crazy amount.


This is true. When I play NBA 2K11 I can't resist and take 30 shots a game with Melo. But Amare is pretty efficient so it doesn't matter.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,248
And1: 25,705
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#35 » by moocow007 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:40 am

NYsportsfan6230 wrote:The more I think about it, I actually kinda agree with BSPN for a change.

I really don't think that Amare and Melo's game can mesh well. I wonder if STAT would be the type to complain about not getting enough touches. I mean Melo has taken like 35 shots this game, that's a crazy amount.


Him trying to play his way off the team (which even his coach has apparently admitted) might have something to do with that.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,592
And1: 137,429
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#36 » by god shammgod » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:42 am

moocow007 wrote:
NYsportsfan6230 wrote:The more I think about it, I actually kinda agree with BSPN for a change.

I really don't think that Amare and Melo's game can mesh well. I wonder if STAT would be the type to complain about not getting enough touches. I mean Melo has taken like 35 shots this game, that's a crazy amount.


Him trying to play his way off the team (which even his coach has apparently admitted) might have something to do with that.


yeah, i think those 2 guys will share with each other. everybody else, not so much.
NJ_YANKEE_45
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,835
And1: 111
Joined: Feb 12, 2011
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#37 » by NJ_YANKEE_45 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:42 am

Lol at Bucks fan holding up a Got Melo sign with a Knicks jersey on it.
Image

Sky_Knicks wrote:
markdeez33 wrote:Bargnani is strokin it!!! I'm going nuts in here! Prove them haters wrong, kid

:o
NYman15
Veteran
Posts: 2,742
And1: 25
Joined: Oct 09, 2009
Location: Florida

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#38 » by NYman15 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:42 am

Ok I gotta ask the question now that the Nets are in it, would you do the deal that was reported with Felton, Curry, Gallo, anther starter( Fields, Chandler, Moz) and a 1st pick for billups and melo? Would you do that tonight if it is offered?
User avatar
Starksfor3
RealGM
Posts: 14,170
And1: 907
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Perpetual Knick hell
       

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#39 » by Starksfor3 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:43 am

god shammgod wrote:
moocow007 wrote:
NYsportsfan6230 wrote:The more I think about it, I actually kinda agree with BSPN for a change.

I really don't think that Amare and Melo's game can mesh well. I wonder if STAT would be the type to complain about not getting enough touches. I mean Melo has taken like 35 shots this game, that's a crazy amount.


Him trying to play his way off the team (which even his coach has apparently admitted) might have something to do with that.


yeah, i think those 2 guys will share with each other. everybody else, not so much.


And you think that's conducive to winning basketball?
User avatar
Gregory151
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,858
And1: 281
Joined: May 11, 2010
Location: New York City
     

Re: [Camelo Thread Part 19] - Walsh: Bluff Me? Bluff You!!! 

Post#40 » by Gregory151 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:43 am

For years, All-Star weekend has been mostly about what happens off the court, with the parade of parties, marketing gimmicks, and of course, the time-honored tradition of predicting which unhappy All-Star is going to be traded first.

A year ago, it was Amar'e Stoudemire. Go back into the archives, and it was Jason Kidd. This year's guest on the NBA's annual version of "Most Eligible Superstar" is, of course, Carmelo Anthony. Next up in Orlando in February 2012 will be Chris Paul, Deron Williams, and hometown hero Dwight Howard.
......

"This league is getting dangerous," Hornets point guard Chris Paul told CBSSports.com. "There's a lot of really good teams at the top, and you just want to put yourself in a good situation to give yourself longevity and things like that. Guys want to win multiple championships, if at all possible."

As with any other attempt to play negotiating hardball, the owners' stance comes with a "careful what you wish for" disclaimer. A decade removed from the only work stoppage in league history, NBA owners coincidentally have been victimized by their own strategy of limiting the salaries of top players and incentivizing star free agents to stay with their current teams. After a dramatic escalation of salaries in the 1990s, the league instituted a maximum salary and gave teams a tool to keep their own free agents -- Larry Bird rights, which have mostly prevented superstars from abandoning their teams. Then, James, Wade and Bosh obliterated conventional wisdom by turning down more money to join forces in Miami.

"With all the speculation about LeBron, everyone kept saying, 'No one turns down the money. Everyone always takes the money,'" one team executive said. "None of us gave much thought to [Miami] getting three guys, even five days out. There was a lot of money at stake. And they gave up a fair amount.

.......


"I'm not sure a year's worth of talk is good for our game, whether it's Melo, Chris Paul, or Dwight Howard," a team executive said. "If this is just the new game, that might not be good. ... You get not only the silliness Denver is dealing with now, but you get the silliness of the last few years in Cleveland before [James] left, where you had one bad signing after another trying to please him or maximize him before he could walk."

.......

"If Melo can force his way to New York on the cheap, then I think that's going to shake a lot of owners in Memphis, San Antonio, Utah, and Sacramento," one of the team executives said. "You're going to say, 'Even if I draft one of these guys, I won't even be able to keep him because the power dynamic is such that you can just run to desirable location.'"

And if you happen to own a team in an undesirable location? Or you're a GM who works for such a team?

"If the game just becomes who can live in the sun on the East Coast or the West Coast," the executive said, "then I'm up a creek."

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/story/1469 ... f-its-kind
"We’ll find a way to either make him a very useful player in our organization, or whatever"

Return to New York Knicks