KnicksGod wrote:I'd rather die in a fire than watch Stephon Marbury wear a Knick uniform ever again.
If there's a bad culture that surrounds the Knicks, it's not from Dolan. It's from New York, the crazy fans, the idiotic media, etc.

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
KnicksGod wrote:I'd rather die in a fire than watch Stephon Marbury wear a Knick uniform ever again.
If there's a bad culture that surrounds the Knicks, it's not from Dolan. It's from New York, the crazy fans, the idiotic media, etc.
BBALLER4FR wrote:Sprewell4Three wrote:BBALLER4FR wrote:What is wrong with some of you guys? Everybody was shouting "Savior!" from the rooftops for Baron Davis. If you can honestly say that right now you'd prefer watching this 32 year old version of Baron Davis starting over this 35 year old version of Stephon Marbury you're nuts. Maybe Jeremy Lin is the future of the Knicks but it's not set in stone with Melo here. And that's nothing to do with Melo's effort but more to do with the night and day production you get from him with vs. with Lin and Amare on the floor. Marbury (if he wanted to come back) would be relatively cheap, is always healthy and he still plays at a very high level. Better than Kidd, Davis, Bibby, Fisher or any other veteran PG around his age. I would take Marbury 100 times right now of Baron Davis.
It doesn't matter what Marbury can do for this team on the court. He brings too much baggage. The team doesn't need this media frenzy right now. I don't understand why some of you guys can't just move on? Nobody in the NBA has signed Marbury since his Celtic days. Yet for some ridiculous reason we still have Knicks fans that think Marbury can be a positive addition lol..
Isiah brought baggage. Larry Brown brought baggage. Mike D'Antoni brought baggage. James Dolan has baggage. They all chose to have Marbury carry it for them. You strip away every one of those guys and Marbury is a success in NY. Getting rid of Marbury didn't fix our problems. Getting rid of coaches/GM's who had baggage is what helped us.
NoLayupRule wrote:this is a hysterical
in truth he'd be perfect
end of career, looking for a ring, just lead his team to a championship in China, a position we are in desperate need for help at, in shape, etc
the funny thing is that with all that stuff we'd still rather play an shadow of Baron Davis, a joke in Douglas and Bibby and a bandaid in Shumpert at point than bring him in and offer him redemption
thats an emotional response though.
It might be a smart move to offer him a chance to fix his legacy and relationship with the NY fans but coming here, playing off the bench, and being a limited role player
if he were a grown up he would do it and he'd be ideal
but hes not
Sprewell4Three wrote:JoseChinga wrote:Marbury is the best shape of his life right now, he's extremely conditioned to an elite level and so is his mind. He would be a more quality option than Baron Davis who looks like a snail on the court...he's close to retirement...I mean even Derek Fisher moves better than this guy. How much you have to be in denial to understand Davis is DONE? A rookie SG has taken over the PG duties because Davis can't deliver. Marbury is actually a good option here.
Oh please, Marbury was a hack on the Knicks. It doesn't take media propaganda to realize that. Marbury and Isiah are tied to the hip. You bring back Marbury might as well bring back Isiah while you're at it. We've basically washed ourselves from the remnants of the Isiah era yet we have idiot fans that want Marbury back? Unbelievable...
Invictus wrote:i'd never want marbury back here. Partially because it would just bring more circus and hoopla to the franchise, but also because the man has found his place in basketball, and maybe life.
Why take that away from him?
waya wrote:I hope he doesn't think you represent the view of all Knick fans. Let that vaseline-eating, intern-banging joke of a franchise player stay in China