knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
Workforce250 wrote:Boy we really do turn quickly on our players,,typical New York fan base. As I recall everyone was hyped over this kid as a rookie and excited about his return year 2, with his improved jumper.
Now he's had a bad start and the entire Knicks misfortunes are his fault. Now he's not even worth an empty can of tuna fish. Dam.
god shammgod wrote:knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
not that woodson shouldn't go but how does that connect ?
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
god shammgod wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Time to be honest?
Shump was way overhyped as a rookie, failed to live up to the superstar expectations right away and now people are disappointed.
He can still be a solid player and the kind of player you want on your team, but everyone looks bad in a poorly coached trade rumor filled toxic environment like this. He's being put in a position to fail.
Its the typical cycle of a young player on the Knicks. Next step is that he will be traded for scraps, he will find a role somewhere else, and people will regret that we gave him away. The same damn things happen with this team over and over and over and over.
that part rarely happens
god shammgod wrote:Workforce250 wrote:Boy we really do turn quickly on our players,,typical New York fan base. As I recall everyone was hyped over this kid as a rookie and excited about his return year 2, with his improved jumper.
Now he's had a bad start and the entire Knicks misfortunes are his fault. Now he's not even worth an empty can of tuna fish. Dam.
not all his fault. and i think we'd live with any mistakes he made on offense, any missed shots. but you're in the league because of defense and energy. that's your skill and you can always do that. but he's not.
GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
bornaknick1 wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Time to be honest?
Shump was way overhyped as a rookie, failed to live up to the superstar expectations right away and now people are disappointed.
He can still be a solid player and the kind of player you want on your team, but everyone looks bad in a poorly coached trade rumor filled toxic environment like this. He's being put in a position to fail.
Its the typical cycle of a young player on the Knicks. Next step is that he will be traded for scraps, he will find a role somewhere else, and people will regret that we gave him away. The same damn things happen with this team over and over and over and over.
Superstar expectations? Dude doesn't even look like an average starter.
knicks85 wrote:GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:hes clearly stressing...this is not a clear reflection of his skills... Woodson must go
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
so the contentious environment of a nonresponding losing team would not directly influence a young player?
bornaknick1 wrote:He's a below average 2 guard and a decent rotation player at best. He has shown little to no improvement since his rookie year and has regressed as a shooter. His ball-handling is terrible and defensively has been as bad as everyone on this team. Going 0'fer on the stat sheet in 20 plus minutes of play is inexcusable for a NBA player, never mind a starter. Trade rumors don't create terrible play on that level.
Fact is he was overhyped by most Knick fans for a) having a cool haircut b) having a cool personality c) being athletic. He showed some flashes in his rookie year but its clear he won't show much more than that. Definitely not untradeable as one of our few viable assets.
GONYK wrote:knicks85 wrote:GONYK wrote:
I'm not seeing what one has to do with the other
so the contentious environment of a nonresponding losing team would not directly influence a young player?
You're assuming the only difference between a winning environment and a losing environment is Woodson.
You're also assuming that Shump's entire reason for being in the NBA, defense, should be affected by anything else but his lack of effort.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.