OT: Derrick Rose accused of rape.

BBALLER4FR · Post #21 » by **BBALLER4FR** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:49 am

Methinks this is going to turn into the "Bizzaro Cosby thread" where everyone rips the accuser and defends the accused. Should be fun.

kej718 · Post #22 » by **kej718** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:05 am

They about to ruin this guys career for something his accuser did not press charges for when it happened? :nonono:

She dated him 2-3 years and did all of that stuff? :nonono:

Even if he didn't do it this will stay with him for the rest of his career and all of those endorsements will be gone too. That being said if the Bulls were some how able to release him, I'm just saying we do have cap space :nod:

Could anyone actually be this stupid? I think they have to check their phone records to see if anything was mentioned by either person around the time it was alleged to happen.

DrCoach · Post #23 » by **DrCoach** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:06 am

I don't buy any of this, I think Rose is Gay personally

kej718 · Post #24 » by **kej718** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:08 am

BBALLER4FR wrote:Methinks this is going to turn into the "Bizzaro Cosby thread" where everyone rips the accuser and defends the accused. Should be fun.

I don't see the comparison. She says they dated for a couple of years right? Now if some other women come out then :banghead:

.

AmazingJason · Post #25 » by **AmazingJason** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:23 am

If they were dating, it can't be rape, right?

I kid, I kid.

knicks lurker · Post #26 » by **knicks lurker** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:40 am

SelbyCobra wrote:
kane wrote:whoa wait a second... rose drugged her and she escaped and then rose and friends broke into her house and "gang raped her" ahhh that seems a bitch far fetched

Agreed. The same night? Clearly made up. Everyone knows it takes Rose much longer than that to come back.

Juggynaut · Post #27 » by **Juggynaut** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:45 am

Sounds so bull but Rose is stupid and looks like a freaky kind of guy so anything is possible.

Zooropa · Post #28 » by **Zooropa** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:50 am

SelbyCobra wrote:
kane wrote:whoa wait a second... rose drugged her and she escaped and then rose and friends broke into her house and "gang raped her" ahhh that seems a bitch far fetched

Agreed. The same night? Clearly made up. Everyone knows it takes Rose much longer than that to come back.

EchelonNYK · Post #29 » by **EchelonNYK** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:50 am

Being famous sucks.

Vash · Post #30 » by **Vash** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:51 am

It shows, when you have money be careful. She's lying, straight off the bat. This is what these hoes...do. You must look at ROse's character. So many things are considered rape that shouldn't. I read stories about feminists trying to pass laws about, if a man lies about name, again, income, job, living life...ect or you have regrets about sleeping with a man, you can claim it is rape.

Rape laws change all the time, so maybe 10 years from now, looking at a woman, and thinking of having sex will be rape.

Anyhow, be careful men, keep it in your pants if you even think, B!tch maybe craaaazZY! All it takes is some saved sperm or a false accusation and you will be in jail, no proof.

HarthorneWingo · Post #31 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:02 am

Brooklyn_Yards wrote:Op, You must work for TMZ. I changed that headline, Rose has not been charged with rape but is being accused. BIG difference.

Right. She filed a civil suit. There have been no criminal charges.

Iron Mantis · Post #32 » by **Iron Mantis** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:44 am

this convoluted story is painting this man as beyond thirsty but....really just sounds like a concocted extortion attempt.

BBALLER4FR · Post #33 » by **BBALLER4FR** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:48 am

kej718 wrote:
BBALLER4FR wrote:Methinks this is going to turn into the "Bizzaro Cosby thread" where everyone rips the accuser and defends the accused. Should be fun.

I don't see the comparison. She says they dated for a couple of years right? Now if some other women come out then .

So now you get to make the rules of hypocrisy? So only if MORE women come out, not the fact that a woman has accused a high profile celebrity of drugging them and raping them, is it worthy of scrutiny? Got it! We have to wait for more women to make the claim before it's plausable! :nonono:

More women = credibility
1 woman = shennanigans

No relation = credibility
Close relation = shennanigans

So, to recap:

After going backstage in the late 70's, women claim they were drugged and raped decades later and that is unexpected and undeniable!!!

After a few years dating a woman claims she was raped within the last 3 years and you consider it a farce.

Fair enough.

2010 · Post #34 » by **2010** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:01 am

It always kills me when females accuse someone of rape yet file a civil suit bypassing criminal charges.

NyKnicks1714 · Post #35 » by **NyKnicks1714** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 7:24 am

BBALLER4FR wrote:
kej718 wrote:
BBALLER4FR wrote:Methinks this is going to turn into the "Bizzaro Cosby thread" where everyone rips the accuser and defends the accused. Should be fun.

I don't see the comparison. She says they dated for a couple of years right? Now if some other women come out then .

So now you get to make the rules of hypocrisy? So only if MORE women come out, not the fact that a woman has accused a high profile celebrity of drugging them and raping them, is it worthy of scrutiny? Got it! We have to wait for more women to make the claim before it's plausable!

More women = credibility
1 woman = shennanigans

No relation = credibility
Close relation = shennanigans

So, to recap:

After going backstage in the late 70's, women claim they were drugged and raped decades later and that is unexpected and undeniable!!!

After a few years dating a woman claims she was raped within the last 3 years and you consider it a farce.

Fair enough.

Bill Cosby is a serial rapist. Just admit you're cool with rape already and move on.

TraSoul82 · Post #36 » by **TraSoul82** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:14 am

SelbyCobra wrote:
kane wrote:whoa wait a second... rose drugged her and she escaped and then rose and friends broke into her house and "gang raped her" ahhh that seems a bitch far fetched

Agreed. The same night? Clearly made up. Everyone knows it takes Rose much longer than that to come back.

BBALLER4FR · Post #37 » by **BBALLER4FR** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:27 am

NyKnicks1714 wrote:
BBALLER4FR wrote:
kej718 wrote:
I don't see the comparison. She says they dated for a couple of years right? Now if some other women come out then .

So now you get to make the rules of hypocrisy? So only if MORE women come out, not the fact that a woman has accused a high profile celebrity of drugging them and raping them, is it worthy of scrutiny? Got it! We have to wait for more women to make the claim before it's plausable!

More women = credibility
1 woman = shennanigans

No relation = credibility
Close relation = shennanigans

So, to recap:

After going backstage in the late 70's, women claim they were drugged and raped decades later and that is unexpected and undeniable!!!

After a few years dating a woman claims she was raped within the last 3 years and you consider it a farce.

Fair enough.

Bill Cosby is a serial rapist. Just admit you're cool with rape already and move on.

Derrick Rose is accused of the very thing Bill Cosby is and yet we have people immediately coming to his defense where Cosby was never given the benefit of the doubt. When you can admit you intentionally glossed over that fact to support adolescent group think while injecting smarmy nonsense then I will "admit" that I am cool with rape.

Moose · Post #38 » by **Moose** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 10:37 am

BBALLER4FR wrote:
NyKnicks1714 wrote:
BBALLER4FR wrote:
So now you get to make the rules of hypocrisy? So only if MORE women come out, not the fact that a woman has accused a high profile celebrity of drugging them and raping them, is it worthy of scrutiny? Got it! We have to wait for more women to make the claim before it's plausable!

More women = credibility
1 woman = shennanigans

No relation = credibility
Close relation = shennanigans

So, to recap:

After going backstage in the late 70's, women claim they were drugged and raped decades later and that is unexpected and undeniable!!!

After a few years dating a woman claims she was raped within the last 3 years and you consider it a farce.

Fair enough.

Bill Cosby is a serial rapist. Just admit you're cool with rape already and move on.

Derrick Rose is accused of the very thing Bill Cosby is and yet we have people immediately coming to his defense where Cosby was never given the benefit of the doubt. When you can admit you intentionally glossed over that fact to support adolescent group think while injecting smarmy nonsense then I will "admit" that I am cool with rape.

What in the hell are you talking about?

emo · Post #39 » by **emo** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:16 am

Bitches ain't shyt.

BBALLER4FR · Post #40 » by **BBALLER4FR** » Thu Aug 27, 2015 11:30 am

Moose wrote:
BBALLER4FR wrote:
NyKnicks1714 wrote:
Bill Cosby is a serial rapist. Just admit you're cool with rape already and move on.

Derrick Rose is accused of the very thing Bill Cosby is and yet we have people immediately coming to his defense where Cosby was never given the benefit of the doubt. When you can admit you intentionally glossed over that fact to support adolescent group think while injecting smarmy nonsense then I will "admit" that I am cool with rape.

What in the hell are you talking about?

DrCoach wrote:Don't fabricate posts

kej718 wrote:They about to ruin this guys career for something his accuser did not press charges for when it happened?
She dated him 2-3 years and did all of that stuff?

Even if he didn't do it this will stay with him for the rest of his career and all of those endorsements will be gone too. That being said if the Bulls were some how able to release him, I'm just saying we do have cap space

Could anyone actually be this stupid? I think they have to check their phone records to see if anything was mentioned by either person around the time it was alleged to happen.

Vash wrote:It shows, when you have money be careful. She's lying, straight off the bat. This is what these hoes...do. You must look at ROse's character. So many things are considered rape that shouldn't. I read stories about feminists trying to pass laws about, if a man lies about name, again, income, job, living life...ect or you have regrets about sleeping with a man, you can claim it is rape.

Rape laws change all the time, so maybe 10 years from now, looking at a woman, and thinking of having sex will be rape.

Anyhow, be careful men, keep it in your pants if you even think, B!tch maybe craaaazZY! All it takes is some saved sperm or a false accusation and you will be in jail, no proof.

Iron Mantis wrote:this convoluted story is painting this man as beyond thirsty but....really just sounds like a concocted extortion attempt.