Build a Team 17.0 Discussion Thread #2

Post #21 » by **j4remi** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:32 am

There's actually a PG available that I'd really like for her team that I think would make a perfect fit.

AmazingJason · Post #22 » by **AmazingJason** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:33 am

ctorres wrote:I love having a co-gm, 3toheadmelo making this fun! We're taking care of our boy KD

Yeah, I might try that next time around. Does sound fun

Mecca · Post #23 » by **Mecca** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:33 am

j4remi wrote:There's actually a PG available that I'd really like for her team that I think would make a perfect fit.

Can you suspend someone greenie off pettiness?

Post #24 » by **mpharris36** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:37 am

ctorres wrote:I love having a co-gm, 3toheadmelo making this fun! We're taking care of our boy KD

i've liked almost all your picks and Tyler Johnson is good I just don't love him as a starting 2 because of his size with teague.

Surprised you passed on Hood, he would of been perfect 2 guard next to teague.

Post #25 » by **Manhattan Project** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:39 am

Man someone is really gonna have to explain where all of this love is coming from for Hood. He's a decent player, but man some people are talking him up like he's a can't miss pick.

El Poochio · Post #26 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:40 am

mpharris36 wrote:
ctorres wrote:I love having a co-gm, 3toheadmelo making this fun! We're taking care of our boy KD

i've liked almost all your picks and Tyler Johnson is good I just don't love him as a starting 2 because of his size with teague.

Surprised you passed on Hood, he would of been perfect 2 guard next to teague.

Surprised you are not against Teague knowing your hard stance with Rose :lol:

Post #27 » by **mpharris36** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:41 am

El Poochio wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
ctorres wrote:I love having a co-gm, 3toheadmelo making this fun! We're taking care of our boy KD

i've liked almost all your picks and Tyler Johnson is good I just don't love him as a starting 2 because of his size with teague.

Surprised you passed on Hood, he would of been perfect 2 guard next to teague.

Surprised you are not against Teague knowing your hard stance with Rose

teague avgs 8 assists a game...he's like prime steve nash with his vision compared to Rose.

El Poochio · Post #28 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:42 am

BowlRips you here?

I WANT TO FCKING PICK MAN UGH

El Poochio · Post #29 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:42 am

mpharris36 wrote:
El Poochio wrote:
mpharris36 wrote:
i've liked almost all your picks and Tyler Johnson is good I just don't love him as a starting 2 because of his size with teague.

Surprised you passed on Hood, he would of been perfect 2 guard next to teague.

Surprised you are not against Teague knowing your hard stance with Rose

teague avgs 8 assists a game...he's like prime steve nash with his vision compared to Rose.

Haha I disagree

El Poochio · Post #30 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:44 am

AmazingJason wrote:
El Poochio wrote:
Greenie wrote:97 is on the block.

No trading on the clock come on you already did this once

LOL, damn I can't imagine not having picked in 5 days.

It'd be pretty crazy if you couldn't get your pick in tonight. 6 days of no picks

My sickness still hasnt perfectly cured, maybe its related :eek2:

AmazingJason · Post #31 » by **AmazingJason** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:46 am

El Poochio wrote:BowlRips you here?

I WANT TO FCKING PICK MAN UGH

I hope to get in #120 tomorrow. Seems like there's a chance we can run through the rest of the 90s and the early 100s after Greenie deals #97.

Greenie · Post #32 » by **Greenie** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:47 am

I'm not even negotiating...
Jeez

I'm going to pick
Relax

Greenie · Post #33 » by **Greenie** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:48 am

swisscheeseD wrote:Greenie got too cute in her trade downs and has missed out on some opportunities to land some real quality contributors. I think she realized at #91, that there wasn't really anyone truly putting her over the top in a 2nd option role. She's made some quality moves, but after taking on Adams (not a scoring option) as her 2nd player, she really needed to make a splash with some of that depth. She should be targeting particular players already selected, offering up some of that depth that she has already acquired.

I only move down when my guy gets taken.

El Poochio · Post #34 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:49 am

Greenie wrote:I'm not even negotiating...
Jeez

I'm going to pick
Relax

Tank you babe

El Poochio · Post #35 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:50 am

BOWLRIPS GET YO FAT AZZ IN HERE

LJ4pointplay · Post #36 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:52 am

sig check

AmazingJason · Post #37 » by **AmazingJason** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:52 am

El Poochio wrote:BOWLRIPS GET YO FAT AZZ IN HERE

5 days of your guy narrowly being taken...it would suck if he got taken at #99 :eek2:

swisscheeseD · Post #38 » by **swisscheeseD** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:52 am

Greenie wrote:
swisscheeseD wrote:Greenie got too cute in her trade downs and has missed out on some opportunities to land some real quality contributors. I think she realized at #91, that there wasn't really anyone truly putting her over the top in a 2nd option role. She's made some quality moves, but after taking on Adams (not a scoring option) as her 2nd player, she really needed to make a splash with some of that depth. She should be targeting particular players already selected, offering up some of that depth that she has already acquired.

I only move down when my guy gets taken.

If the guy was worth taking to begin with, theres no reason with your depth that you can't get something done.

NewEra · Post #39 » by **NewEra** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:55 am

AmazingJason wrote:
El Poochio wrote:
Greenie wrote:97 is on the block.

No trading on the clock come on you already did this once

LOL, damn I can't imagine not having picked in 5 days.

It'd be pretty crazy if you couldn't get your pick in tonight. 6 days of no picks

Dag 6 days? Gotta be a record

El Poochio · Post #40 » by **El Poochio** » Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:00 am

NewEra wrote:
AmazingJason wrote:
El Poochio wrote:
No trading on the clock come on you already did this once

LOL, damn I can't imagine not having picked in 5 days.

It'd be pretty crazy if you couldn't get your pick in tonight. 6 days of no picks

Dag 6 days? Gotta be a record

Time is relative