Context wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Context wrote:We still need Mitch. He's a part of our team until he's not so for that single reason even if we lose to OKC or win- I don't think we
see our full potential until Mitch is in the mix. I think a good example of a player that is finally a working part in this Knick engine
is Mikal...So thats my opinion
oh and happy new year Knick family!!!!
I mean OKC is missing Chet too though. But OKC is a great test for us. We need to be able to beat those type of teams if we want to win it all. We can't really hide from that imo.
Good point - I forgot about Chet...I agree that we need to beat OKC- I'm just saying that we may need to be at full strength![]()
I think the rotation/bodies is still very limited for us and hopefully somebody is making progress in practice with Thibs
Eh i think it's fair game since they don't have chet who's much more important to their team than mitch is for us. If we can beat a team by 30 that has Gobert and Randle who are pretty physical I think our bigs should be able to take down Hartenstein. Our big test is being able to stop SGA. He seems unguardable now



























