dakomish23 wrote:god shammgod wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Don’t defend signing the bench guys we did, to the numbers we did, instead of getting picks (again), and then complain about a rookie max
this is a ridiculous take. tying up the salary cap by paying a guy with injury concerns, and who hasn't even shown he's worth it, a max deal for 4 years is the same as not making a trade for a 1st round pick in the 20s and instead signing a bunch of one year deals ? really ?
No. The ridiculous take is defending all the bad choices just because those are the ones we ended up with.
You were saying he’s not worth the max before he was traded?
3 options
Give a young stud coming off an injury a 5 year rookie max
Use your extra cap space (wouldn’t prevent you from getting Randle or Morris) to get two firsts (not one don’t change the context) by taking on expiring deals of good vets who could come off the bench (Iggy Harkless)
Signing the bench vets we did on on one year deals
It’s clear which is the worst of the 3 options. I know I’m not alone on this.
You aren't. Even worse ... the negative equity from Timmy was created by the same azzhat who approved the trade. We should have just ridden out Noah and Timmy until we had a real free agent with two functional legs who wanted to come here. Instead they jumped the shark twice to begin the starr fellating.





















Time to start making excuses for KP's poor start. Maybe it's just rust. Maybe he'll start scoring when they get another big next to him. Maybe he'll start playing up to potential in a couple of months.










