RHODEY wrote:8516knicks wrote:Interesting you bring up that Clipper team. They seem a pretty good comp to our current Knicks.
Their best player was a top point guard (Paul vs. Brunson), they had a pretty good all-star forward (Blake Griffin vs Randle), a pretty good “garbageman center” (DeAndre Jordan vs. Mitch), another good player (Billups vs. RJ) and a decent bench/starter Villanovan (Foye vs. Hart). Also a WHO? guy (Who? vs. Grimes).![]()
They got close but never could make that final leap. (but like with Brunson, DeAndre pissed off Mark Cuban on almost signing again)![]()
![]()
But still that Clips team was better than their current All Star NAMES team. So be careful what u wish for – adding a NAME or two isn’t always the answer. Toronto Kawhi was/is not Clippers Kawhi. And for that matter wasn’t Spurs Kawhi either .
But sure would be nice to have a two-way center even if he were slightly (not majorly) less impactful on D.
But that probably also goes nowhere without a new Coach. I’m still happy about playoffs after a 2 decade drought.
On the surface we might be similar to that Clippers team, but we have an RJ.... and Mitch IMO is way more impactful defensively than Jordan, while receiving way less lob opportunities.
How impactful was his defense against Kristaps? First game against them he was in foul trouble, second game against them he was on the perimeter and his rim protection was null and void as a result. Kristaps is 8-16 on shots being guarded by him and his team has scored 79 pts as a result of that matchup, their highest total on the season. The next closest matchup has resulted in 45 team pts, he and his team feasts against Mitch but but defense!!
It's absurd to me that some of you can't see this simple thing, negate his defense with shooting and then make him a negative on offense because of his lack of skill. This is how rim runners have been sent to die for the last 10 years.