newyorker4ever wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:
Right, for Kyrie, but now we have D.Fox or D.Mitchell so why sign Kyrie to a max? I guess D.Mitchell can play either guard spot so him and Kyrie would actually be a pretty damn nice back court.
Those other teams didn't want KP. Or they did without the dumpster fire that were the combined contracts of THJr and CLee. Thanks Phil-Mills.
Yeah i get that but that wasn't the point i was trying to make. What my point was was if the Knicks supposedly had inside info that Kyrie was gonna sign with us in the offseason then why would they try to trade KP for a PG when they could of tried for a SF or a SG or any other position? A lot of people were saying that the Knicks never would of traded KP if they didn't already have a commitment from KD and or Kyrie or from any of the max guys and i never believed that and think they made the trade without any commitments from any players. I think their thinking is if they strike out in free agency then keep building with young players through the draft and make sure any money you spend will be off the books for the following offseason and try for two max players again. The problem is we might not ever see a free agency with this many star/super star players in it like we'll have this offseason.
True. Maybe they are more sure about Durant (if that's true) and DSJr was a hedge against Kyrie, who is less of a known thing.





























