knicks85 wrote:can we do that when the other party doesn't have a very popular candidate..CharlesOakley wrote:BKlutch wrote:I know your vote didn't do this because you live in NY, but votes for Nader gave us President George W. Bush because of Florida. We really went through 8 years of horrible leadership and many died for his wars. They are still dying. Our economy tanked.
We don't have any perfect candidates. But helping to elect a bad one is frightening.
I understand your point. Hillary >>>> Trump, but at some point, we need to stop voting for the lesser of two evils. In most states, a vote for a 3rd party candidate will do nothing to effect the outcome of a general election, thanks to the electoral college. People shouldn't be made to feel wrong for voting for a candidate that represents their values. It needs to happen if a 3rd party is ever going to take off. I can't foresee the current GOP ever putting up a candidate that isn't dangerous to our future. I'm not going to vote for every Democrat patsy just because the GOP is 10x more dangerous. I don't see how progress will ever be made that way. Hopefully, people on the other side of the isle start voting 3rd (or 4th) party too.
I'll be voting for Jill Stein.
A very popular, crazy, fascist, fear mongering candidate..
Seriously guys, any other election, that's fine. But not this one.
Unless you're in a state that's not close at all then do whatever you want.














