PG: Julius "Steph Curry" Randle carries us once again

Clyde_Style · Post #241 » by **Clyde_Style** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 10:27 pm

This video is sponsored by The Republic of Grimestan and I approve this message

3toheadmelo · Post #242 » by **3toheadmelo** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 10:28 pm

Fat Kat wrote:
hundreth wrote:The whole RJ thing is pretty perplexing. He's had stretches of great play, especially his sophomore season. He's regressed. Clearly most of his issues are mental and confidence related.

RJ has had and still does have potential to be a great player, it's just unclear if he'll ever conquer his mind. It isn't looking great. He should work with a sports psychologist and simplify what he's working on. He spent all this time over the summer working on shooting off the dribble when he should be working on just spot up shooting. He needs to be in the gym shooting 3s over and over until its muscle memory, and stop over thinking every movement.

Read on Twitter

we are fked

Clyde_Style · Post #243 » by **Clyde_Style** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 10:44 pm

Watch on YouTube

This guy looks smart now. Like me.

3toheadmelo · Post #244 » by **3toheadmelo** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:18 pm

Watch on YouTube

KnicksNext · Post #245 » by **KnicksNext** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:23 pm

It's funny how this board switches future Knicks stars every week. RJ, Obi, Cam, IQ and Grimes. That's our starting 5 of rotating future stars depending on the week (or game).

This week Grimes is back in the spotlight. Not that I don't love the kid, but we do this over and over again. :lol:

KnicksNext · Post #246 » by **KnicksNext** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:26 pm

I wonder what it would take for a team to take RJ, considering the player he is currently and with the contract he just signed. Would we need to attach a 1st for a team to take a chance with that contract?

3toheadmelo · Post #247 » by **3toheadmelo** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:27 pm

KnicksNext wrote:It's funny how this board switches future Knicks stars every week. RJ, Obi, Cam, IQ and Grimes. That's our starting 5 of rotating future stars depending on the week (or game).

This week Grimes is back in the spotlight. Not that I don't love the kid, but we do this over and over again.

all the switching and randle is still our best player. :lol:

Jimmit79 · Post #248 » by **Jimmit79** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:33 pm

Read on Twitter

?t=DuAaYoIvgZdVAGPA5ZYP3A&s=19

Hard worker lol

ohboy109 · Post #249 » by **ohboy109** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:34 pm

TrueWarrior wrote:
KnixtapeH20 wrote:We could team up, keeps playing like this there's gona be teams that wanna add him, so win-win for team Randle / Randle haters. UNITE!!!

I'm wit it... Randle can't sustain a career in NY we savages so better for him to go to a smaller market

Julius is not being traded playing like this dude. We’re past that now lol. He’s still going to play like a bonehead sometimes, but he’s been balling for the most part.

Obi has been allergic to the paint on offense this season. He’s been soft. Barely even dunks anymore. The way he’s played lately he deserves to get benched, not start.

The Julius vs Obi stuff is over for now. As long as Julius can actually keep this up then I have little issue with keeping him, although Id still sell high before he goes postal again.

He will get traded Randle stan Knicks know they can't build around that loser

Post #250 » by **j4remi** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:34 pm

Read on Twitter

Recap up

KnicksNext · Post #251 » by **KnicksNext** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:34 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
KnicksNext wrote:It's funny how this board switches future Knicks stars every week. RJ, Obi, Cam, IQ and Grimes. That's our starting 5 of rotating future stars depending on the week (or game).

This week Grimes is back in the spotlight. Not that I don't love the kid, but we do this over and over again.

all the switching and randle is still our best player.

right

KnicksNext · Post #252 » by **KnicksNext** » Thu Dec 8, 2022 11:41 pm

TrueWarrior wrote:
KnixtapeH20 wrote:We could team up, keeps playing like this there's gona be teams that wanna add him, so win-win for team Randle / Randle haters. UNITE!!!

I'm wit it... Randle can't sustain a career in NY we savages so better for him to go to a smaller market

Julius is not being traded playing like this dude. We’re past that now lol. He’s still going to play like a bonehead sometimes, but he’s been balling for the most part.

Obi has been allergic to the paint on offense this season. He’s been soft. Barely even dunks anymore. The way he’s played lately he deserves to get benched, not start.

The Julius vs Obi stuff is over for now. As long as Julius can actually keep this up then I have little issue with keeping him, although Id still sell high before he goes postal again.

It's funny to think about how much talk there was about Obi being a better player than Randle. Obi is a career bench big role player, and the Randle is a legitimate starter in the league who has the ability to take over games.

I'm not a big fan of Juluis the person, but skill-wise there's no doubt now he's twice the player Obi will ever be. It's not fair to Randle to compare him to a part time role player like Obi.

PeteW · Post #253 » by **PeteW** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 1:56 am

Jimmit79 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?t=DuAaYoIvgZdVAGPA5ZYP3A&s=19

Hard worker lol

He aint care anymore cuz he got the bag already.

HighRyzer83 · Post #254 » by **HighRyzer83** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 3:11 am

Besart19 wrote:
HighRyzer83 wrote:Signing Rose to that contract was a bad idea. He can always score but just trash on defense. Same for Fournier. Too many games we lost just by leaving the 3 open.

With Deuce and Grimes, that void is essentially filled. Now you're starting to see why Grimes was a deal breaker in that Mitchell proposal and RJ wasn't.

I'll give credit to thibs for sitting his boys Rose and Fournier in exchange for deuce and Grimes but I'm pretty sure it's because his job was on the line and someone else got involved. Otherwise why the fck took him so long to see the obvious.

Rose, Fournier and Reddish for Westbrook and two picks

I'd do that in a heartbeat but why would they?

Ghetto Gospel · Post #255 » by **Ghetto Gospel** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 3:33 am

Jimmit79 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?t=DuAaYoIvgZdVAGPA5ZYP3A&s=19

Hard worker lol

they all said first one in, last one out the gym

but then again they say that for all the kids which doesn't really make sense cause only one of em can do that

Jimmit79 · Post #256 » by **Jimmit79** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 4:21 am

PeteW wrote:
Jimmit79 wrote:

Read on Twitter
?t=DuAaYoIvgZdVAGPA5ZYP3A&s=19

Hard worker lol

He aint care anymore cuz he got the bag already.

Yea I'm just going to enjoy fans target him now this is NY you don't get away playing trash while making 30mil per year.

Woodsanity · Post #257 » by **Woodsanity** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 6:35 am

KnicksNext wrote:It's funny how this board switches future Knicks stars every week. RJ, Obi, Cam, IQ and Grimes. That's our starting 5 of rotating future stars depending on the week (or game).

This week Grimes is back in the spotlight. Not that I don't love the kid, but we do this over and over again.

I ain't even gonna lie I have thought all those guys are bums for a while now.

Tired of fellow Knicks fans overhyping every bum that we draft just because we drafted them.

None of them really look promising to me especially RJ who I always hoped would prove me wrong but nope. He is what I thought he would be. :noway:

Only bright point is Brunson. Neutral on Randle for now, he is ok. Compared to RJ Brickrett he is a superstar.

HarthorneWingo · Post #258 » by **HarthorneWingo** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 6:45 am

KnicksNext wrote:I wonder what it would take for a team to take RJ, considering the player he is currently and with the contract he just signed. Would we need to attach a 1st for a team to take a chance with that contract?

What other RJ is there to consider?

I know what you mean, of course. I think it depends on what we’re taking back. I’m sure there are many different ways to use RJ in a trade if we were inclined to go in that direction. Would we looking to move him to create cap space? Maybe we attach him to Fournier for Westbrook and a number 1?

ohboy109 · Post #259 » by **ohboy109** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 12:25 pm

sol537 wrote:1) Rose to CHI
2) Fournier to LAL or MIL
3) Cam for a late 1st (or two 2nds) and an expiring

Clean it up...

Cleaning up us shipping Randle out if here too no one can play with his low iq self

KNICKFAN374 · Post #260 » by **KNICKFAN374** » Fri Dec 9, 2022 4:24 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
KnicksNext wrote:I wonder what it would take for a team to take RJ, considering the player he is currently and with the contract he just signed. Would we need to attach a 1st for a team to take a chance with that contract?

What other RJ is there to consider?

I know what you mean, of course. I think it depends on what we’re taking back. I’m sure there are many different ways to use RJ in a trade if we were inclined to go in that direction. Would we looking to move him to create cap space? Maybe we attach him to Fournier for Westbrook and a number 1?

RJ straight up for Duarte, Duarte has more upside & we get rid of RJ's ridiculous contract.