Kampuchea wrote:KnicksGod wrote:HopelessKnick wrote:I remember last year....we were up 2-0 but OG got hurt in game 2. We almost beat them in game 3 despite having no Mitch, no Randle and no OG. They needed a miracle shot by Nemphard to win that game. Now we have lost Hartenstein and DD from that team that played the Pacers but we have now Mitch + KAT + OG + Mikal in there. If our top 7 stay healthy we'll win this series.
Knicks top 7 >>>> Pacers top 7
If the Knicks don't win this series then it is because Thibs got severely outcoached.
Brunson >>>>> Haliburton
Hart >>>> Nemphard
Mikal >>> Nesmith
OG < Siakam
KAT >>> Turner
We have 5 out of the best 7 players on both teams and we have the best player on the court as well. This series shouldn't even be that close. If we stay healthy, we should really win.
I'd say Turner is even with KAT or better and Brunson and Hali are not comparable.
Turner even with KAT? Or better?
I didn’t think they were that close at all, with KAT being obviously better. Turner can’t rebound
It's hard to play the PvP battle because in all honesty it doesn't matter. Pacers all play the same tempo/pace on offense. They are 11 deep with guys who can be a problem and they know/trust all of them.
Obi Toppin might be < Precious in certain context, but Toppin is going to score 12 points in 20 minutes on 7 shots. 2-4 from 3, 3-3 dunks.
Celtics game plan was OG vs Tatum. There really is no singular assignment this series. They are predictably un-predictable.
We really have not struggled with them at any time when we have been healthy, so I am really not worried, but it's a completely different animal compared to Pisons (Cade and Co) and Celtics (Tatum's team)