Rasho Brezec wrote:http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073
This was just cruel

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Rasho Brezec wrote:http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073
gavran wrote:Rasho Brezec wrote:http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073
This was just cruel
can o peas wrote:gavran wrote:Rasho Brezec wrote:http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073
This was just cruel
you two are probably originally romanian anyway
MaseInYourFace wrote:He doesn't have that lean athletic build most b-ball players and this particular build is very hard to put weight on (although doable with NBA facilities, staff, etc). He has more of a baseball/football build. Weight gain if necessary should not be a problem at all for him.
TrueWarrior wrote:Just to get an idea of how weird Josh's body is: His standing reach is the same as Chuck Hayes who is 3 inches shorter with 1 inch shorter arms. Scalabrine has a 1 inch standing reach advantage at the same height and vert. Size wise Josh looks more like a PF than a C to me. Im sure he can get away at C at times if he really battles and learns to stay out of foul trouble, but its just going to be really hard with that length disadvantage. Josh has heart, but my expectations are pretty low for the guy. I just dont know anybody with his lack of physical tools making it in the league who cant shoot threes. Hes just really going to have to get jacked as hell and become a dominant post defender. The odds are very against him, but Im rooting our new friend Jorts.
TrueWarrior wrote:Just to get an idea of how weird Josh's body is: His standing reach is the same as Chuck Hayes who is 3 inches shorter with 1 inch shorter arms. Scalabrine has a 1 inch standing reach advantage at the same height and vert. Size wise Josh looks more like a PF than a C to me. Im sure he can get away at C at times if he really battles and learns to stay out of foul trouble, but its just going to be really hard with that length disadvantage. Josh has heart, but my expectations are pretty low for the guy. I just dont know anybody with his lack of physical tools making it in the league who cant shoot threes. Hes just really going to have to get jacked as hell and become a dominant post defender. The odds are very against him, but Im rooting our new friend Jorts.
That's an interesting parallel. What impresses me the most about Perkins is his grasp of defense. Listening to his post game interviews on how the team planned its defensive strategies is really impressive. I have no idea on Jorts' BBIQ, but if he is at that Perkins level, he can definitely establish a long productive career despite the limited athleticism.moocow007 wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:Just to get an idea of how weird Josh's body is: His standing reach is the same as Chuck Hayes who is 3 inches shorter with 1 inch shorter arms. Scalabrine has a 1 inch standing reach advantage at the same height and vert. Size wise Josh looks more like a PF than a C to me. Im sure he can get away at C at times if he really battles and learns to stay out of foul trouble, but its just going to be really hard with that length disadvantage. Josh has heart, but my expectations are pretty low for the guy. I just dont know anybody with his lack of physical tools making it in the league who cant shoot threes. Hes just really going to have to get jacked as hell and become a dominant post defender. The odds are very against him, but Im rooting our new friend Jorts.
Yep, same sentiments all the way around.
Some potential positives? Kendrick Perkins really didn't rank highly in terms of athleticism, toolset or center height either coming out of HS (he wasn't anywhere near being "Baby Shaq") and yet he's made a great career for himself by basically just doing one thing well...being a bruiser of a post defender. Perkins did work hard on his conditioning (something that Harrellson and the Knicks really need to focus on majorly) and really got himself physically prepared to go up against the big boys (he was dough boyish coming into the NBA and in his rookie season). Not saying that Harrellson will ever become Perkins but there is hope he can be a serviceable role player. Just needs to work hard (real hard likely) to realize it. Long shot? Yeah I'd say so. But a shot never the less.
TheToothFairy wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:Just to get an idea of how weird Josh's body is: His standing reach is the same as Chuck Hayes who is 3 inches shorter with 1 inch shorter arms. Scalabrine has a 1 inch standing reach advantage at the same height and vert. Size wise Josh looks more like a PF than a C to me. Im sure he can get away at C at times if he really battles and learns to stay out of foul trouble, but its just going to be really hard with that length disadvantage. Josh has heart, but my expectations are pretty low for the guy. I just dont know anybody with his lack of physical tools making it in the league who cant shoot threes. Hes just really going to have to get jacked as hell and become a dominant post defender. The odds are very against him, but Im rooting our new friend Jorts.
You just mentioned Hayes:) Perkins, Kris Humphries, Tyler Hansbrough, Carl Landry, Haslem, al Jeff, Big Baby, Dejuan Blair
Falstaffxx wrote:I'm sure you're right that those guys have advantages over Harrellson, but isn't Harrellson a lot more bulky than them? He's undersized in terms of reach as a center, but he should be more than strong enough.
TrueWarrior wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:I'm sure you're right that those guys have advantages over Harrellson, but isn't Harrellson a lot more bulky than them? He's undersized in terms of reach as a center, but he should be more than strong enough.
Jorts isnt stronger than Hayes, Perkins, Humphries, Haslem, Al Jeff, Big Baby, and Blair. Maybe Landry and Hansbrough, but those guys play tough too. The others are all bigger, longer, and more athletic than Jorts.
Being strong can only do so much. This isnt football. Many undersized and bulky players have failed miserably in the NBA. Luke Harangody is strong as sh*t with a bigger reach than Jorts, but you wont catch him playing center. Jorts' best chance is to drop weight, get stronger, get a nasty jumper and become a hustle PF like Luke.
Im done knocking Jorts though. Lets see what he can do.
aq_ua wrote:moocow007 wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:Just to get an idea of how weird Josh's body is: His standing reach is the same as Chuck Hayes who is 3 inches shorter with 1 inch shorter arms. Scalabrine has a 1 inch standing reach advantage at the same height and vert. Size wise Josh looks more like a PF than a C to me. Im sure he can get away at C at times if he really battles and learns to stay out of foul trouble, but its just going to be really hard with that length disadvantage. Josh has heart, but my expectations are pretty low for the guy. I just dont know anybody with his lack of physical tools making it in the league who cant shoot threes. Hes just really going to have to get jacked as hell and become a dominant post defender. The odds are very against him, but Im rooting our new friend Jorts.
Yep, same sentiments all the way around.
Some potential positives? Kendrick Perkins really didn't rank highly in terms of athleticism, toolset or center height either coming out of HS (he wasn't anywhere near being "Baby Shaq") and yet he's made a great career for himself by basically just doing one thing well...being a bruiser of a post defender. Perkins did work hard on his conditioning (something that Harrellson and the Knicks really need to focus on majorly) and really got himself physically prepared to go up against the big boys (he was dough boyish coming into the NBA and in his rookie season). Not saying that Harrellson will ever become Perkins but there is hope he can be a serviceable role player. Just needs to work hard (real hard likely) to realize it. Long shot? Yeah I'd say so. But a shot never the less.
That's an interesting parallel. What impresses me the most about Perkins is his grasp of defense. Listening to his post game interviews on how the team planned its defensive strategies is really impressive. I have no idea on Jorts' BBIQ, but if he is at that Perkins level, he can definitely establish a long productive career despite the limited athleticism.
TheToothFairy wrote:I think Jorts has a good chance to start if we don't sign FA big
Falstaffxx wrote:TheToothFairy wrote:I think Jorts has a good chance to start if we don't sign FA big
Better chance than Jordan?
Falstaffxx wrote:TheToothFairy wrote:I think Jorts has a good chance to start if we don't sign FA big
Better chance than Jordan?
Falstaffxx wrote:TheToothFairy wrote:I think Jorts has a good chance to start if we don't sign FA big
Better chance than Jordan?