Knicksfan1992 wrote:K-DOT wrote:god shammgod wrote:the problem with 3-5 year projects is that you have to pay them after 4 years, and you really need to decide if you want to after only 3 years or lose them for nothing. you're basically paying to train someone, and you have to guesstimate if it's gonna be worth investing even more money in them before they even produce for you.
NBA should work out a way for teams to have guys in the G League for a couple years after being drafted and not take time off their NBA contracts. Like how in the MLB, you can draft a kid at 17, but if he's not ready to play until he's 23 or 24, you still get 7 years of team control on him
Obviously not to that extent, but especially if we're gonna start drafting kids out of high school, being up for a new contract at like 21 in some cases seems too early to make a call, which is why you get scenarios where guys like Wiggins get massively overpaid based off projected value because it's either that or lose them completely at age 23
Thing is is, most guys coming out at the top of the draft don't need that, so it's not really a huge deal, and I can't see the player's union liking giving more control to the owners though.
Honestly though, that's a pretty good compromise as long as the player still gets paid, but it doesn't count on the cap. I don't get this war with the owners that the media and players are trying to wage. NBA is pretty much the gold standard for Salary Cap sports and how players are treated/paid and Owners are profiting.
I would think the player availability would have to work like the season IR in football though.
If you draft a project, and after TC and preseason think he's not going to be a contributor for the year, you can send him to the G-League but lose the ability to call him up if you want to not lose a year of his rights.