3toheadmelo wrote:im jealous
Do we know if we went after him in FA?
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
dakomish23 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:im jealous
Do we know if we went after him in FA?

HerSports85 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:im jealous
Me too. The bulls are clearly the better team

thebuzzardman wrote:HerSports85 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:im jealous
Me too. The bulls are clearly the better team
Good. You two can go root for the Bulls. I'm sure their bandwagon isn't full yet.

3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:HerSports85 wrote:
Me too. The bulls are clearly the better team
Good. You two can go root for the Bulls. I'm sure their bandwagon isn't full yet.
seems like you and rasho having a tough morning since your Mavs sucks

thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Good. You two can go root for the Bulls. I'm sure their bandwagon isn't full yet.
seems like you and rasho having a tough morning since your Mavs sucks
I could give two f*cks about the Mavs either.

3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:seems like you and rasho having a tough morning since your Mavs sucks
I could give two f*cks about the Mavs either.
im kidding. just disappointing to see a team like the Bulls be much better than us. they upgraded their talent while the Knicks went for mediocrity.

thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
I could give two f*cks about the Mavs either.
im kidding. just disappointing to see a team like the Bulls be much better than us. they upgraded their talent while the Knicks went for mediocrity.
The Knicks are trying/tried to split the difference between competing at some kind of level now, while retaining the ability to make a big upgrade.
The Bulls said f*ck it and decided to upgrade to a team they'll have for the next 4 years.
Knicks could have done that and I'm sure by the 70 game mark we'd hear nothing but that they are riding a shiny treadmill.
I'm not sold the Knicks idea will work out. In fact, since it's the Knicks, probably not.
Also helps that the Bulls had a prototypical wing to build around while the Knicks have Wandle and Stiff Robot.

3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:im kidding. just disappointing to see a team like the Bulls be much better than us. they upgraded their talent while the Knicks went for mediocrity.
The Knicks are trying/tried to split the difference between competing at some kind of level now, while retaining the ability to make a big upgrade.
The Bulls said f*ck it and decided to upgrade to a team they'll have for the next 4 years.
Knicks could have done that and I'm sure by the 70 game mark we'd hear nothing but that they are riding a shiny treadmill.
I'm not sold the Knicks idea will work out. In fact, since it's the Knicks, probably not.
Also helps that the Bulls had a prototypical wing to build around while the Knicks have Wandle and Stiff Robot.
here’s the thing though, do we really have the ability to make a big upgrade? if I’m a GM, I don’t exactly see a package of Kemba, Fournier, Burks and trash first round picks being enticing.
I’d even argue that the Bulls can trade Lonzo/Derozan for a true super star with the way they’re playing. I think they’re in a much better position than us. They’re winning and have players living up to their contracts that can be used as trade bait for a real difference maker.

thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
The Knicks are trying/tried to split the difference between competing at some kind of level now, while retaining the ability to make a big upgrade.
The Bulls said f*ck it and decided to upgrade to a team they'll have for the next 4 years.
Knicks could have done that and I'm sure by the 70 game mark we'd hear nothing but that they are riding a shiny treadmill.
I'm not sold the Knicks idea will work out. In fact, since it's the Knicks, probably not.
Also helps that the Bulls had a prototypical wing to build around while the Knicks have Wandle and Stiff Robot.
here’s the thing though, do we really have the ability to make a big upgrade? if I’m a GM, I don’t exactly see a package of Kemba, Fournier, Burks and trash first round picks being enticing.
I’d even argue that the Bulls can trade Lonzo/Derozan for a true super star with the way they’re playing. I think they’re in a much better position than us. They’re winning and have players living up to their contracts that can be used as trade bait for a real difference maker.
This has been covered a lot. Their value is next year as expiring deals.
But, the Knicks would still have to offer players that generate some interest. I'm not sure if Obi, IQ, Grimes do that (if you figure the Knicks are keeping Randle and RJ). I'm not sure the Knicks ability to offer up 3 picks that fall in in the mid 20's helps. Or the 3,492 2nd rounders. But this seems to be the plan.
Maybe they know something via WWW. Other than it's a good thing to sell Dolan on hope for for a few years and get paid big $$$

3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:here’s the thing though, do we really have the ability to make a big upgrade? if I’m a GM, I don’t exactly see a package of Kemba, Fournier, Burks and trash first round picks being enticing.
I’d even argue that the Bulls can trade Lonzo/Derozan for a true super star with the way they’re playing. I think they’re in a much better position than us. They’re winning and have players living up to their contracts that can be used as trade bait for a real difference maker.
This has been covered a lot. Their value is next year as expiring deals.
But, the Knicks would still have to offer players that generate some interest. I'm not sure if Obi, IQ, Grimes do that (if you figure the Knicks are keeping Randle and RJ). I'm not sure the Knicks ability to offer up 3 picks that fall in in the mid 20's helps. Or the 3,492 2nd rounders. But this seems to be the plan.
Maybe they know something via WWW. Other than it's a good thing to sell Dolan on hope for for a few years and get paid big $$$
We’re basically banking on Wes and Leon to have some secret connections cause our trade assets are ass


robillionaire wrote:if we had chicago's roster people would still be calling it a treadmill since they're locked into it until 2024 or 2025, have traded multiple first round picks and aren't going to win the championship
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
This has been covered a lot. Their value is next year as expiring deals.
But, the Knicks would still have to offer players that generate some interest. I'm not sure if Obi, IQ, Grimes do that (if you figure the Knicks are keeping Randle and RJ). I'm not sure the Knicks ability to offer up 3 picks that fall in in the mid 20's helps. Or the 3,492 2nd rounders. But this seems to be the plan.
Maybe they know something via WWW. Other than it's a good thing to sell Dolan on hope for for a few years and get paid big $$$
We’re basically banking on Wes and Leon to have some secret connections cause our trade assets are ass
The Knicks role players are useful and not untradeable, ESPECIALLY when they'll be expiring. Which, unfortunately is in 1.5 seasons - next season's deadline. But I've always had some doubts that a package of mediocre youth combined with mediocre 1st round picks and a Danny Ainge\Sam Presti sized bundle of 2nd rounders nets anything decent.

dakomish23 wrote:robillionaire wrote:if we had chicago's roster people would still be calling it a treadmill since they're locked into it until 2024 or 2025, have traded multiple first round picks and aren't going to win the championship
There are a lot of Ball & Lavine fans here I thought?
They’re good. We’re good. We’ll see who’s better by year end.



thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
I could give two f*cks about the Mavs either.
im kidding. just disappointing to see a team like the Bulls be much better than us. they upgraded their talent while the Knicks went for mediocrity.
The Knicks are trying/tried to split the difference between competing at some kind of level now, while retaining the ability to make a big upgrade.
The Bulls said f*ck it and decided to upgrade to a team they'll have for the next 4 years.
Knicks could have done that and I'm sure by the 70 game mark we'd hear nothing but that they are riding a shiny treadmill.
I'm not sold the Knicks idea will work out. In fact, since it's the Knicks, probably not.
Also helps that the Bulls had a prototypical wing to build around while the Knicks have Wandle and Stiff Robot.
I like the Caruso pick up too.
I've defended resigning Rose/Burks/Noel and the plan they seem to be following, but now I'm starting to wonder if this is just more Scott Perry bullsh*t, modified by Aller's skills and Leon's desire to make a big splash.
F*ck a Scott Perry. I wish they fired this freckle faced f*ck, but they extended him.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

thebuzzardman wrote:dakomish23 wrote:robillionaire wrote:if we had chicago's roster people would still be calling it a treadmill since they're locked into it until 2024 or 2025, have traded multiple first round picks and aren't going to win the championship
There are a lot of Ball & Lavine fans here I thought?
They’re good. We’re good. We’ll see who’s better by year end.
I thought this team was good. It is most certainly not good.
It might be good after a theoretical trade that happens most likely halfway through next season. We shall see.
As I stated to melo, I'm not sure how mediocre youth, mediocre 1st round picks in the mid 20's, and 9,318 2nd rounders nets anyone great, but hey, maybe WWW has some intel on someone.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
dakomish23 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:im kidding. just disappointing to see a team like the Bulls be much better than us. they upgraded their talent while the Knicks went for mediocrity.
The Knicks are trying/tried to split the difference between competing at some kind of level now, while retaining the ability to make a big upgrade.
The Bulls said f*ck it and decided to upgrade to a team they'll have for the next 4 years.
Knicks could have done that and I'm sure by the 70 game mark we'd hear nothing but that they are riding a shiny treadmill.
I'm not sold the Knicks idea will work out. In fact, since it's the Knicks, probably not.
Also helps that the Bulls had a prototypical wing to build around while the Knicks have Wandle and Stiff Robot.
I like the Caruso pick up too.
I've defended resigning Rose/Burks/Noel and the plan they seem to be following, but now I'm starting to wonder if this is just more Scott Perry bullsh*t, modified by Aller's skills and Leon's desire to make a big splash.
F*ck a Scott Perry. I wish they fired this freckle faced f*ck, but they extended him.
My hope is a good team needs depth so we give them Burks & Noel.
