Context wrote:HighRyzer83 wrote:
Kat is all NY sports right now
Kat is linked to the Knicks as a child -just like Brunson...
Bro I just teared up over that story about KAT's dad
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Context wrote:HighRyzer83 wrote:
Kat is all NY sports right now
Kat is linked to the Knicks as a child -just like Brunson...
stuporman wrote:Scary part, the team isn't firing on all cylinders but they are so talented they don't need to have everybody going to beat most teams. Just get it all together by the playoffs because they need nearly everyone on point by then because against the best teams playing as inconsistent as they have won't win a series.


stuporman wrote:Not only have the Knicks won 8 games in a row, they have an 8 game road winning streak, the second longest streak in franchise history.

jvsimonetti0514 wrote:I swear right after Josh signed that contract knives were out and I felt like the only one defending him. Had to fight off lots of people calling him overpaid and now everybody loves him. Glad everyone learned ball finally

Capn'O wrote:Guano wrote:stuporman wrote:Not only have the Knicks won 8 games in a row, they have an 8 game road winning streak, the second longest streak in franchise history.
11 of the 15 games in january are at home
1 road game in brooklyn so pretty much 12.
should be another great month
Most of the east coast are home games tbh.

Knick4Real wrote:TheDavinciCHODE wrote:yes baby, let's pad the wins against really bad teams and make us look better than we really are. End of January is when the schedule starts to get really tough, so I'll wait til then to pass judgement.
I'm happy we are winning, but can't get hyped about beating Washington twice.
Wins are wins, but let's just keep it chill. This is the worst team in the league.
No, let's NOT keep it chill!
Wins don't only count against the best in the league. ALL wins count, against both good AND bad teams. And home court advantage matters when teams win the most of their 82 games -- again, against both good AND bad teams.
After decades of dysfunction, we finally have a competent front office, a consistent coach, a team loaded with (possibly) multiple all-stars and (maybe) an MVP. We're a top 3 team in the east and finally an elite and respectable team in all of the NBA. That's worth celebrating.
Sure, we're beating teams we're supposed to beat. However, that's all part of the process. Don't discount it.


Jalen Bluntson wrote:
That game was an abomination. We were just not ready yet. We were also shorthanded. Hopefully we see them at full strength in February. I want revenge!


NowWHYcee7 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:NowWHYcee7 wrote:We will find out what we really are against OKC.
I’m ready to go full homer if we beat them
Likewise. If we beat them, let alone decisively, I'm all in for the Knicks to take it all

stuporman wrote:After the 11th game of the season...the Knicks were 5-6 and the Cavs were 11-0
Since then the Cavs are 17-4 and the Knicks are 18-4

Context wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:
That game was an abomination. We were just not ready yet. We were also shorthanded. Hopefully we see them at full strength in February. I want revenge!
I'll be honest JB...I doubt that the Celtics looked at a Knick team with 10 new players and said to themselves "is this the knick team yall think will challenge/beat us" they've been playing this game their entire lives...they knew we had no chemistry...the real test will
be when Mitch has 10 games under his belt and we play them...
ctorres wrote:Context wrote:HighRyzer83 wrote:
Kat is all NY sports right now
Kat is linked to the Knicks as a child -just like Brunson...
Bro I just teared up over that story about KAT's dad

Context wrote:stuporman wrote:Not only have the Knicks won 8 games in a row, they have an 8 game road winning streak, the second longest streak in franchise history.
yeah...I heard about that and will make sure to mention it in the Utah game thread...
?
blueNorange wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
That's probably the better move
I get that Stewart is a bit better than Precious as a C but at 6'8 he's no bigger. Is he enough of a rim protector?
no, he’s actually trash on defense too
i don’t want players from losing organizations
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.


mpharris36 wrote:blueNorange wrote:WaltFrazier wrote:I get that Stewart is a bit better than Precious as a C but at 6'8 he's no bigger. Is he enough of a rim protector?
no, he’s actually trash on defense too
i don’t want players from losing organizations
He is absolutely not trash on defense. You should check your information again.
?t=aGp_LRCVNaJ1J0AFt9rK0A&s=19