god shammgod wrote:not to be that guy but i'm confused....he had 4 points on 2-7 shots. he was 0-5 from 3. so he played good defense ? didn't we already know he could do that ?
probably what matters is he was shooting in the upper 40s from 3 with actual shooting volume thus a strong sample size. That he had some games after that where he was cold doesn't negate that he is a good three point shooter overall. If you can get him those shots in the flow of the offense he should be fairly efficient in the 3 & D role