GONYK wrote:
Ah, this is the real concern. I admit, that is a legitimate one, though I think it applies more to the LP folks than it does Kasich.
All politics are transactional, so I have no doubts that everyone is jockeying for position in whatever the new world order of Republican politics will be. I also agree that the Dems may be giving them the cover of credibility here as well.
I can respect that apprehension. At the end of the day, you're right about me. I think 4 more years of Trump is basically the death of the American experiment. I can't plan the next 4 years and beyond, politically speaking, when the house is burning down around me. So I'm willing to work with whoever.
Will that cost us down the line? Perhaps. But I'd rather have a "down the line" than not.
Yeah, I definitely agree that the LP heads are the ones that have me on edge. Kasich, I chuckled about because I think he's a legitimate principled guy who I just don't agree with. He's pretty much harmless.
The credibility cover legitimately concerns me and I'll fully admit that prior to Trump, I wouldn't have batted an eye. But then Trump gets in and suddenly we have players from the Iran Contra scandal managing to snake back into the upper echelons of influence...and I'm still reeling from it.
While I agree on us absolutely needing to stop Trump, my main pause comes at not believing we need to win. I get that there's a "why risk it though" element behind accepting their support though. That's why my main conceit is "I get this is unique and won't push back on taking the help...but we need to make damn sure not to elevate these cats or forget who they are" because I've seen how short this country's memory span is. Basically, I think it comes down to how much material benefit LP will offer in this election. I surmise that their impact is already being overrated...hell, Trump was threatening to sue his old campaign manager over the poll numbers before the LP fired attack ads or took any victory laps on the day time news shows.




















