K-DOT wrote:Capn'O wrote:j4remi wrote:
Great succinct way to put it at the conclusion.
And 100% agree that without some technical acumen, it can be tough to discern between reputable sources, bad sources, factual reporting, and editorializing (especially in this blogger era imo). I've been working at a health sciences library for over a decade and spent the past 6 working on resource selection directly...so I'm spoiled to have access to everything and to have reviewed a lot of sources and publishing processes in that span. I have zero doubt that I'd be susceptible to a lot of the faux-science out there if I didn't have a place adjacent to the research and publishing. I'm still out of my depths when this stuff gets deep enough into the weeds. If I didn't know about concepts like predatory publishers, pre-prints, and how to use certain databases; I'd feel lost in this era of mass information with little to no curation from most sources.
Totally. The papers themselves are Greek to me which is why I go fishing for news summaries.
Searching news for good information is just so frustrating. Just these past few weeks, trying to decide whether my daughter should enter kindergarten (OMG) remote or in person I had a hell of a time finding the critical piece of information of why hospitalizations of children have been up so much with Delta. I finally found a news article published in a paper from Sydney, Australia that summarized Delta data well and clearly presented findings showing that the spike was primarily attributable to increased contagion and not increased virulence with children. So we're giving it a go figuring their risk is low and we're vaccinated. And it sounds like authorization for kids is just around the bend.
But... that's a really, really important piece of information that's just buried. And I don't think most people have the acumen or resources to even ask that question let alone suss out what answers actually make sense from a list of search results.
I think part of it is that our education system just kinda sucks, but another part of it is, it's significantly easier to put out misinformation than it is to disprove it. Like that Mark Twain quote, a lie travels halfway around the world while the truth puts on its shoes or whatever
The big issue is, that for the people spreading misinformation, they don't have to convince anyone they're right, just that there's some doubt. Personally, I don't know many people who say they know for sure the vaccine is bad, just that they don't know if it is or isn't, which is a victory for the anti-vax crowd
Known moon criminal HBomberguy did a video a while back about vaccines and why people are hesitant to take them. It's pretty long and mostly deals with the original "vaccines cause autism" doctor and how f*cked up his study was (like, they would have the parents of autistic kids sign off on procedures which are normally fine for adults, like colonoscopies, but are extremely dangerous for children, especially in some cases toddlers), and how he didn't even find anything, but he ties it in to Covid towards the end.Spoiler:
I'm not even talking about conspiracy theories. Just trying to get a good summary of scientific positions from news sources. Masking was another area where the news/gov was just all over the place. That graphic with the dude peeing >>>>> any media source on explaining the benefit. I think I got it from a post of yours on the CA board.